{"title":"阿多诺五十岁时的美学理论:导言","authors":"P. E. Gordon","doi":"10.1215/0094033x-8989190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Great works wait. While their metaphysical meaning dissolves, something of their truth content, however little it can be pinned down, does not.” This hopeful remark appears in Theodor W. Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory, a work that was first published in 1970, just a year after the author’s death. Fifty years later we can still hear in this remark a double entendre. In both art and personal life, we must surrender any hope for metaphysical eternity, but we can nonetheless affirm the survival of what we might call the “truth content” that is preserved in either an artwork or any “work” that survives long after its creator has passed. It is no less true for great works of philosophy, which are born with an aura at a particular time and place. No doubt this aura, too, is vulnerable to decay, but the work continues to awaken new thoughts well after the aura has dissolved. Wewill never be done reading Aesthetic Theory. It is admittedly the case for any work of philosophical importance that the task of its interpretation is ongoing and potentially infinite. But for a work such as Aesthetic Theory this truismmaycarry an enhanced truth. Because the author left it unfinished, all of us in the community of readers are burdened with the task of completing the work itself, as if each critical encounter were not only an interpretation but also","PeriodicalId":46595,"journal":{"name":"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory at Fifty: Introductory Remarks\",\"authors\":\"P. E. Gordon\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/0094033x-8989190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Great works wait. While their metaphysical meaning dissolves, something of their truth content, however little it can be pinned down, does not.” This hopeful remark appears in Theodor W. Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory, a work that was first published in 1970, just a year after the author’s death. Fifty years later we can still hear in this remark a double entendre. In both art and personal life, we must surrender any hope for metaphysical eternity, but we can nonetheless affirm the survival of what we might call the “truth content” that is preserved in either an artwork or any “work” that survives long after its creator has passed. It is no less true for great works of philosophy, which are born with an aura at a particular time and place. No doubt this aura, too, is vulnerable to decay, but the work continues to awaken new thoughts well after the aura has dissolved. Wewill never be done reading Aesthetic Theory. It is admittedly the case for any work of philosophical importance that the task of its interpretation is ongoing and potentially infinite. But for a work such as Aesthetic Theory this truismmaycarry an enhanced truth. Because the author left it unfinished, all of us in the community of readers are burdened with the task of completing the work itself, as if each critical encounter were not only an interpretation but also\",\"PeriodicalId\":46595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-8989190\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-8989190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
“伟大的作品等待着。虽然它们的形而上学意义消失了,但它们的某些真理内容,无论多么难以确定,都不会消失"这句充满希望的话出现在西奥多·w·阿多诺(Theodor W. Adorno)的《美学理论》(Aesthetic Theory)一书中,该书于1970年首次出版,就在阿多诺去世一年后。五十年后的今天,我们仍然可以从这句话中听到双关语。在艺术和个人生活中,我们必须放弃对形而上学永恒的任何希望,但我们仍然可以肯定,我们可以称之为“真理内容”的存在,它保存在艺术品或任何“作品”中,在其创作者去世后很长一段时间里。伟大的哲学著作也是如此,它们在特定的时间和地点产生了一种光环。毫无疑问,这种光环也很容易腐烂,但在光环消散后,这项工作继续唤醒新的思想。我们永远读不完《美学理论》。不可否认,对于任何具有哲学意义的工作来说,解释它的任务都是持续的,而且可能是无限的。但对于像《美学理论》这样的作品来说,这一真理可能带有增强的真实性。因为作者没有完成它,所以我们读者群体中的所有人都肩负着完成作品本身的任务,好像每一次批判性的遭遇不仅是一种解释,而且也是一种解释
Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory at Fifty: Introductory Remarks
“Great works wait. While their metaphysical meaning dissolves, something of their truth content, however little it can be pinned down, does not.” This hopeful remark appears in Theodor W. Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory, a work that was first published in 1970, just a year after the author’s death. Fifty years later we can still hear in this remark a double entendre. In both art and personal life, we must surrender any hope for metaphysical eternity, but we can nonetheless affirm the survival of what we might call the “truth content” that is preserved in either an artwork or any “work” that survives long after its creator has passed. It is no less true for great works of philosophy, which are born with an aura at a particular time and place. No doubt this aura, too, is vulnerable to decay, but the work continues to awaken new thoughts well after the aura has dissolved. Wewill never be done reading Aesthetic Theory. It is admittedly the case for any work of philosophical importance that the task of its interpretation is ongoing and potentially infinite. But for a work such as Aesthetic Theory this truismmaycarry an enhanced truth. Because the author left it unfinished, all of us in the community of readers are burdened with the task of completing the work itself, as if each critical encounter were not only an interpretation but also
期刊介绍:
Widely considered the top journal in its field, New German Critique is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on twentieth- and twenty-first-century German studies and publishes on a wide array of subjects, including literature, film, and media; literary theory and cultural studies; Holocaust studies; art and architecture; political and social theory; and philosophy. Established in the early 1970s, the journal has played a significant role in introducing U.S. readers to Frankfurt School thinkers and remains an important forum for debate in the humanities.