共同决策对决策冲突和妊娠早期筛查试验吸收的影响

Q3 Nursing
Z. Moudi, Raheleh Jam, H. Ansari, M. Montazer Zohour
{"title":"共同决策对决策冲突和妊娠早期筛查试验吸收的影响","authors":"Z. Moudi, Raheleh Jam, H. Ansari, M. Montazer Zohour","doi":"10.32598/jhnm.32.1.2114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several factors influence women’s decision to take First Trimester Screening (FTS) tests. These factors are associated with the ambivalence of women toward undergoing screening tests. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) about undergoing FTS on Decisional Conflict (DC) immediately after consultation and uptake of FTS. Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 200 pregnant women (100 women in the intervention and 100 in the control groups) referred to health centers for prenatal care in 2019. They were selected by the block randomization sampling method. The control group received the routine care and the intervention group, in addition to routine care, attended a 90-min long consultation session based on SDM. The women were contacted via phone at 14 weeks of pregnancy to collect data on their undertaking prenatal screening tests. The demographic characteristics form and O’Conner’s decisional conflict scale were filled out immediately after the consultation session for the intervention group. The obtained data were analyzed by the Chi-square, Fisher exact-test, Mann-Whitney U, and linear regression tests. The P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding women’s demographic characteristics, except for education level, job, and insurance coverage. The Mean±SD DC score was significantly lower in the intervention group (7.35±8.55) compared to the control group (27.32±13.81) (95%CI; 16.80-24.19, P=0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of undergoing the offered FTS (P=0.04). The DC scores ≥25 were associated with a decreased chance of undergoing FTS (P=0.02). Women were less likely to undergo FTS when they were self-employed (OR=0.15, 95%CI; 0.03-0.71, P=0.01). Conclusion: The SDM consultation can help women experience significantly lower levels of DC. Furthermore, factors such as self-employment can prevent women from undergoing FTS despite lower levels of DC.","PeriodicalId":36020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Shared Decision-making on Decisional Conflict and Uptake of First-trimester Screening Tests\",\"authors\":\"Z. Moudi, Raheleh Jam, H. Ansari, M. Montazer Zohour\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/jhnm.32.1.2114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Several factors influence women’s decision to take First Trimester Screening (FTS) tests. These factors are associated with the ambivalence of women toward undergoing screening tests. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) about undergoing FTS on Decisional Conflict (DC) immediately after consultation and uptake of FTS. Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 200 pregnant women (100 women in the intervention and 100 in the control groups) referred to health centers for prenatal care in 2019. They were selected by the block randomization sampling method. The control group received the routine care and the intervention group, in addition to routine care, attended a 90-min long consultation session based on SDM. The women were contacted via phone at 14 weeks of pregnancy to collect data on their undertaking prenatal screening tests. The demographic characteristics form and O’Conner’s decisional conflict scale were filled out immediately after the consultation session for the intervention group. The obtained data were analyzed by the Chi-square, Fisher exact-test, Mann-Whitney U, and linear regression tests. The P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding women’s demographic characteristics, except for education level, job, and insurance coverage. The Mean±SD DC score was significantly lower in the intervention group (7.35±8.55) compared to the control group (27.32±13.81) (95%CI; 16.80-24.19, P=0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of undergoing the offered FTS (P=0.04). The DC scores ≥25 were associated with a decreased chance of undergoing FTS (P=0.02). Women were less likely to undergo FTS when they were self-employed (OR=0.15, 95%CI; 0.03-0.71, P=0.01). Conclusion: The SDM consultation can help women experience significantly lower levels of DC. Furthermore, factors such as self-employment can prevent women from undergoing FTS despite lower levels of DC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.32.1.2114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.32.1.2114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几个因素影响妇女决定采取早期妊娠筛查(FTS)测试。这些因素与妇女对接受筛查试验的矛盾心理有关。目的:本研究旨在探讨共同决策(SDM)对接受FTS后即刻决策冲突(DC)的影响。材料与方法:对2019年到保健中心进行产前护理的200名孕妇(干预组100名,对照组100名)进行准实验研究。采用分块随机抽样方法选取。对照组接受常规护理,干预组在常规护理的基础上,根据SDM进行90分钟的问诊。这些妇女在怀孕14周时通过电话联系,收集她们进行产前筛查测试的数据。干预组在咨询结束后立即填写人口统计学特征表和O 'Conner决策冲突量表。所得数据采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和线性回归检验进行分析。P值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:两组妇女除受教育程度、工作、参保情况外,人口统计学特征无显著差异。干预组的Mean±SD DC评分(7.35±8.55)明显低于对照组(27.32±13.81)(95%CI;16.80 - -24.19, P = 0.001)。此外,两组在接受提供的FTS方面差异有统计学意义(P=0.04)。DC评分≥25分与FTS发生几率降低相关(P=0.02)。自雇妇女发生FTS的可能性较低(OR=0.15, 95%CI;0.03 - -0.71, P = 0.01)。结论:SDM咨询可以帮助女性显著降低DC水平。此外,尽管DC水平较低,但自营职业等因素可以阻止妇女发生FTS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Shared Decision-making on Decisional Conflict and Uptake of First-trimester Screening Tests
Introduction: Several factors influence women’s decision to take First Trimester Screening (FTS) tests. These factors are associated with the ambivalence of women toward undergoing screening tests. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) about undergoing FTS on Decisional Conflict (DC) immediately after consultation and uptake of FTS. Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 200 pregnant women (100 women in the intervention and 100 in the control groups) referred to health centers for prenatal care in 2019. They were selected by the block randomization sampling method. The control group received the routine care and the intervention group, in addition to routine care, attended a 90-min long consultation session based on SDM. The women were contacted via phone at 14 weeks of pregnancy to collect data on their undertaking prenatal screening tests. The demographic characteristics form and O’Conner’s decisional conflict scale were filled out immediately after the consultation session for the intervention group. The obtained data were analyzed by the Chi-square, Fisher exact-test, Mann-Whitney U, and linear regression tests. The P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding women’s demographic characteristics, except for education level, job, and insurance coverage. The Mean±SD DC score was significantly lower in the intervention group (7.35±8.55) compared to the control group (27.32±13.81) (95%CI; 16.80-24.19, P=0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of undergoing the offered FTS (P=0.04). The DC scores ≥25 were associated with a decreased chance of undergoing FTS (P=0.02). Women were less likely to undergo FTS when they were self-employed (OR=0.15, 95%CI; 0.03-0.71, P=0.01). Conclusion: The SDM consultation can help women experience significantly lower levels of DC. Furthermore, factors such as self-employment can prevent women from undergoing FTS despite lower levels of DC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信