要不要茶馆?b孟景辉先锋版老舍经典戏

IF 0.3 4区 文学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Barbara Leonesi
{"title":"要不要茶馆?b孟景辉先锋版老舍经典戏","authors":"Barbara Leonesi","doi":"10.3366/mclc.2023.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lao She’s Teahouse is considered a masterpiece of Chinese theatre, a classic crystallized in the Beijing People’s Art Theatre’s production by Jiao Juyin from 1958, which has been regularly staged up to the present day. In 2018 a production by the well-known “pop avant-garde” director Meng Jinghui premiered at the Wuzhen Theatre Festival, giving rise to a heated debate about the concept of “classics.” This so-called “Teahouse incident” was one of the hot topics of the Chinese theatre scene in 2019, and this article explores the production’s polarized reception and debate. Meng Jinghui’s Teahouse is not examined as a one-way influence between Lao She’s source text and the new text/performance but from the perspective of a network relationship that sets the performance in a web that includes several other texts (plays, novellas, poems, etc.) by Chinese and foreign writers. This perspective shows how Meng Jinghui’s hybridization and his selection of intertexts and stage reminders aim to erase time and space coordinates in order to amplify the main themes of the play and, ultimately, reflect on the human condition. Based on this analysis, the polarized reception of the play and the reactions of the general public, critics, and academics are investigated, illuminating the reasons behind the controversy.","PeriodicalId":43027,"journal":{"name":"Modern Chinese Literature and Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teahouse or Not? Meng Jinghui’s Avant-garde Version of Lao She’s Classic Play\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Leonesi\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/mclc.2023.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lao She’s Teahouse is considered a masterpiece of Chinese theatre, a classic crystallized in the Beijing People’s Art Theatre’s production by Jiao Juyin from 1958, which has been regularly staged up to the present day. In 2018 a production by the well-known “pop avant-garde” director Meng Jinghui premiered at the Wuzhen Theatre Festival, giving rise to a heated debate about the concept of “classics.” This so-called “Teahouse incident” was one of the hot topics of the Chinese theatre scene in 2019, and this article explores the production’s polarized reception and debate. Meng Jinghui’s Teahouse is not examined as a one-way influence between Lao She’s source text and the new text/performance but from the perspective of a network relationship that sets the performance in a web that includes several other texts (plays, novellas, poems, etc.) by Chinese and foreign writers. This perspective shows how Meng Jinghui’s hybridization and his selection of intertexts and stage reminders aim to erase time and space coordinates in order to amplify the main themes of the play and, ultimately, reflect on the human condition. Based on this analysis, the polarized reception of the play and the reactions of the general public, critics, and academics are investigated, illuminating the reasons behind the controversy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Chinese Literature and Culture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Chinese Literature and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/mclc.2023.0029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Chinese Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/mclc.2023.0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《老舍茶馆》被认为是中国戏剧的杰作,是北京人民艺术剧院焦菊隐自1958年起制作的经典之作,至今一直定期上演。2018年,著名“流行先锋”导演金景辉的一部作品在乌镇戏剧节首演,引发了一场关于“经典”概念的热议。这个所谓的“茶馆事件”是2019年中国戏剧界的热点话题之一,本文探讨了这部作品的两极分化的接受和争论。景辉的《茶馆》不是作为老舍原文本与新文本/表演之间的单向影响来考察的,而是从网络关系的角度出发,将表演置于一个包含中外作家的其他文本(戏剧、中篇小说、诗歌等)的网络中。这一视角显示了孟Jinghui的杂交和他对互文和舞台提醒的选择是如何消除时间和空间坐标的,以扩大戏剧的主题,最终反映人类的状况。在此基础上,对该剧的两极化接受以及公众、评论家和学者的反应进行了调查,阐明了争议背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teahouse or Not? Meng Jinghui’s Avant-garde Version of Lao She’s Classic Play
Lao She’s Teahouse is considered a masterpiece of Chinese theatre, a classic crystallized in the Beijing People’s Art Theatre’s production by Jiao Juyin from 1958, which has been regularly staged up to the present day. In 2018 a production by the well-known “pop avant-garde” director Meng Jinghui premiered at the Wuzhen Theatre Festival, giving rise to a heated debate about the concept of “classics.” This so-called “Teahouse incident” was one of the hot topics of the Chinese theatre scene in 2019, and this article explores the production’s polarized reception and debate. Meng Jinghui’s Teahouse is not examined as a one-way influence between Lao She’s source text and the new text/performance but from the perspective of a network relationship that sets the performance in a web that includes several other texts (plays, novellas, poems, etc.) by Chinese and foreign writers. This perspective shows how Meng Jinghui’s hybridization and his selection of intertexts and stage reminders aim to erase time and space coordinates in order to amplify the main themes of the play and, ultimately, reflect on the human condition. Based on this analysis, the polarized reception of the play and the reactions of the general public, critics, and academics are investigated, illuminating the reasons behind the controversy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信