亨利·卡蒂埃-布列松的“人与机器”:重新思考摄影中的冷战交通,反对粮食

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ART
S. James
{"title":"亨利·卡蒂埃-布列松的“人与机器”:重新思考摄影中的冷战交通,反对粮食","authors":"S. James","doi":"10.1080/17514517.2020.1848070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1967 IBM (International Business Machines) commissioned Henri Cartier-Bresson to produce a portfolio of photographs depicting human relationships with technology around the world. These images, along with a selection from the photographer’s archive were realized in 1968 as the touring exhibition and photobook Man and Machine. In contrast to the images of war, revolution and protest, so often mobilized as the documentary imaginary and record of these years, Man and Machine appears to celebrate a harmonious technologically mediated world over which man was still in control. More than this, it seemingly flattens the stark divides between First and Third World experiences under the leveling glow of liberal humanism and what was being naturalized as its equivalent: global Capital. Approaching Man and Machine retrospectively – from the perspective of the New Left’s 1970s critique of documentary humanist photography – as well as in terms of its own contemporaneousness, resituating it in the contemporary image cultures of the Cold War – I propose that documentary photography’s ideological mobility at this juncture might be understood not only as an inherent weakness or limit – as the means of its compromise and ultimate failure – but also as a resource: a potential arsenal of unpredictable, disjunctive and even radical political affects and effects.","PeriodicalId":42826,"journal":{"name":"Photography and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17514517.2020.1848070","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Henri Cartier-Bresson’s ‘Man and Machine’: Rethinking the Cold War Traffic in Photographs, against the Grain\",\"authors\":\"S. James\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17514517.2020.1848070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In 1967 IBM (International Business Machines) commissioned Henri Cartier-Bresson to produce a portfolio of photographs depicting human relationships with technology around the world. These images, along with a selection from the photographer’s archive were realized in 1968 as the touring exhibition and photobook Man and Machine. In contrast to the images of war, revolution and protest, so often mobilized as the documentary imaginary and record of these years, Man and Machine appears to celebrate a harmonious technologically mediated world over which man was still in control. More than this, it seemingly flattens the stark divides between First and Third World experiences under the leveling glow of liberal humanism and what was being naturalized as its equivalent: global Capital. Approaching Man and Machine retrospectively – from the perspective of the New Left’s 1970s critique of documentary humanist photography – as well as in terms of its own contemporaneousness, resituating it in the contemporary image cultures of the Cold War – I propose that documentary photography’s ideological mobility at this juncture might be understood not only as an inherent weakness or limit – as the means of its compromise and ultimate failure – but also as a resource: a potential arsenal of unpredictable, disjunctive and even radical political affects and effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photography and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17514517.2020.1848070\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photography and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2020.1848070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photography and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2020.1848070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要1967年,IBM(国际商业机器公司)委托Henri Cartier Bresson制作了一组照片,描绘了人类与世界各地技术的关系。这些照片,以及从摄影师档案中挑选的一些照片,于1968年作为巡回展览和摄影书籍《人与机器》得以实现。与这些年的纪录片想象和记录中经常被动员起来的战争、革命和抗议图像不同,《人与机器》似乎是在庆祝一个和谐的技术中介世界,而人类仍然控制着这个世界。除此之外,它似乎在自由人文主义和全球资本的平等光芒下,弥合了第一世界和第三世界经历之间的明显分歧。回顾《人与机器》——从新左派20世纪70年代对纪实人文主义摄影的批判的角度——以及从其自身的同期性来看,在冷战的当代图像文化中重新定位它——我认为,纪实摄影在这个时刻的意识形态流动性不仅可以被理解为一种固有的弱点或局限性——作为其妥协和最终失败的手段——而且可以被视为一种资源:一种潜在的不可预测、脱节甚至激进的政治影响和影响的武器库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Henri Cartier-Bresson’s ‘Man and Machine’: Rethinking the Cold War Traffic in Photographs, against the Grain
Abstract In 1967 IBM (International Business Machines) commissioned Henri Cartier-Bresson to produce a portfolio of photographs depicting human relationships with technology around the world. These images, along with a selection from the photographer’s archive were realized in 1968 as the touring exhibition and photobook Man and Machine. In contrast to the images of war, revolution and protest, so often mobilized as the documentary imaginary and record of these years, Man and Machine appears to celebrate a harmonious technologically mediated world over which man was still in control. More than this, it seemingly flattens the stark divides between First and Third World experiences under the leveling glow of liberal humanism and what was being naturalized as its equivalent: global Capital. Approaching Man and Machine retrospectively – from the perspective of the New Left’s 1970s critique of documentary humanist photography – as well as in terms of its own contemporaneousness, resituating it in the contemporary image cultures of the Cold War – I propose that documentary photography’s ideological mobility at this juncture might be understood not only as an inherent weakness or limit – as the means of its compromise and ultimate failure – but also as a resource: a potential arsenal of unpredictable, disjunctive and even radical political affects and effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信