{"title":"Otto Koenigsberger在印度的建筑摄影档案馆(1939–1951)","authors":"Vandana Baweja","doi":"10.1080/01973762.2018.1407132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Otto H. Koenigsberger (1908–1999), a German émigré architect who worked as the state architect in princely Mysore in British India in the 1940s, left a rich collection of photographs of his architecture and planning projects, which now constitute his archive at the Architectural Association Archives in London. This article examines his photographic archive produced between 1939 and 1951 with two objectives. The first is to trace the aesthetic genealogies of the diverse photographic modes used in Koenigsberger’s architectural projects; the second is to establish the importance of Koenigsberger’s architectural photographic archive as a historic artifact in Mysorean architectural histories. I argue that Koenigsberger used photography to represent the ideological tension between modernist and revivalist architectures. In addition, in theorizing the use of photographic modes in relationship to Koenigsberger’s architecture, I build upon Maria Antonella Pelizzari and Paolo Scrivano’s argument that the relationship between the production of architectural photographs and architecture illuminates the underlying ideological constructs that inform both practices. Ultimately, I aim to demonstrate how Koenigsberger’s photographic archive represents a rift in a seamless history of revivalist architecture in princely Mysore.","PeriodicalId":41894,"journal":{"name":"Visual Resources","volume":"34 1","pages":"315 - 346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01973762.2018.1407132","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Otto Koenigsberger’s Architectural Photographic Archive in India (1939–1951)\",\"authors\":\"Vandana Baweja\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01973762.2018.1407132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Otto H. Koenigsberger (1908–1999), a German émigré architect who worked as the state architect in princely Mysore in British India in the 1940s, left a rich collection of photographs of his architecture and planning projects, which now constitute his archive at the Architectural Association Archives in London. This article examines his photographic archive produced between 1939 and 1951 with two objectives. The first is to trace the aesthetic genealogies of the diverse photographic modes used in Koenigsberger’s architectural projects; the second is to establish the importance of Koenigsberger’s architectural photographic archive as a historic artifact in Mysorean architectural histories. I argue that Koenigsberger used photography to represent the ideological tension between modernist and revivalist architectures. In addition, in theorizing the use of photographic modes in relationship to Koenigsberger’s architecture, I build upon Maria Antonella Pelizzari and Paolo Scrivano’s argument that the relationship between the production of architectural photographs and architecture illuminates the underlying ideological constructs that inform both practices. Ultimately, I aim to demonstrate how Koenigsberger’s photographic archive represents a rift in a seamless history of revivalist architecture in princely Mysore.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual Resources\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"315 - 346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01973762.2018.1407132\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2018.1407132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2018.1407132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Otto H.Koenigsberger(1908–1999)是一位德国移民建筑师,曾于20世纪40年代在英属印度的迈索尔王子城担任国家建筑师,他留下了大量建筑和规划项目的照片,这些照片现在构成了他在伦敦建筑协会档案馆的档案。这篇文章考察了他在1939年至1951年间制作的摄影档案,目的有两个。一是追溯柯尼斯堡建筑项目中使用的各种摄影模式的美学谱系;二是确立柯尼希斯伯格的建筑摄影档案作为迈索尔建筑史上的历史文物的重要性。我认为柯尼希斯伯格用摄影来表现现代主义和复兴主义建筑之间的意识形态张力。此外,在将摄影模式的使用与柯尼斯堡的建筑联系起来进行理论化的过程中,我建立在Maria Antonella Pelizzari和Paolo Scrivano的论点之上,即建筑照片的制作与建筑之间的关系阐明了为这两种实践提供信息的潜在意识形态结构。最终,我的目标是展示柯尼希斯伯格的摄影档案如何代表迈索尔王子区复兴主义建筑无缝历史中的裂痕。
Otto Koenigsberger’s Architectural Photographic Archive in India (1939–1951)
Otto H. Koenigsberger (1908–1999), a German émigré architect who worked as the state architect in princely Mysore in British India in the 1940s, left a rich collection of photographs of his architecture and planning projects, which now constitute his archive at the Architectural Association Archives in London. This article examines his photographic archive produced between 1939 and 1951 with two objectives. The first is to trace the aesthetic genealogies of the diverse photographic modes used in Koenigsberger’s architectural projects; the second is to establish the importance of Koenigsberger’s architectural photographic archive as a historic artifact in Mysorean architectural histories. I argue that Koenigsberger used photography to represent the ideological tension between modernist and revivalist architectures. In addition, in theorizing the use of photographic modes in relationship to Koenigsberger’s architecture, I build upon Maria Antonella Pelizzari and Paolo Scrivano’s argument that the relationship between the production of architectural photographs and architecture illuminates the underlying ideological constructs that inform both practices. Ultimately, I aim to demonstrate how Koenigsberger’s photographic archive represents a rift in a seamless history of revivalist architecture in princely Mysore.