不要接受所有并继续：探索与跟踪同意通知进行更深思熟虑的互动

IF 4.8 2区计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1145/3617363

N. Gerber, Alina Stöver, Justin Peschke, Verena Zimmermann

{"title":"不要接受所有并继续：探索与跟踪同意通知进行更深思熟虑的互动","authors":"N. Gerber, Alina Stöver, Justin Peschke, Verena Zimmermann","doi":"10.1145/3617363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal frameworks rely on users to make an informed decision about data collection, e.g., by accepting or declining the use of tracking technologies. In practice, however, users hardly interact with tracking consent notices on a deliberate website per website level, but usually accept or decline optional tracking technologies altogether in a habituated behavior. We explored the potential of three different nudge types (color highlighting, social cue, timer) and default settings to interrupt this auto-response in an experimental between-subject design with 167 participants. We did not find statistically significant differences regarding the buttons clicked. Our results showed that opt-in default settings significantly decrease tracking technology use acceptance rates. These results are a first step towards understanding the effects of different nudging concepts on users’ interaction with tracking consent notices.","PeriodicalId":50917,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Don’t accept all and continue: Exploring nudges for more deliberate interaction with tracking consent notices\",\"authors\":\"N. Gerber, Alina Stöver, Justin Peschke, Verena Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3617363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legal frameworks rely on users to make an informed decision about data collection, e.g., by accepting or declining the use of tracking technologies. In practice, however, users hardly interact with tracking consent notices on a deliberate website per website level, but usually accept or decline optional tracking technologies altogether in a habituated behavior. We explored the potential of three different nudge types (color highlighting, social cue, timer) and default settings to interrupt this auto-response in an experimental between-subject design with 167 participants. We did not find statistically significant differences regarding the buttons clicked. Our results showed that opt-in default settings significantly decrease tracking technology use acceptance rates. These results are a first step towards understanding the effects of different nudging concepts on users’ interaction with tracking consent notices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3617363\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3617363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

法律框架依赖于用户对数据收集做出知情决定，例如接受或拒绝使用跟踪技术。然而，在实践中，用户几乎不会在每个网站级别的刻意网站上与跟踪同意通知进行交互，但通常会以习惯的行为完全接受或拒绝可选的跟踪技术。在一项有167名参与者参加的受试者之间的实验设计中，我们探索了三种不同的轻推类型（颜色高亮、社交提示、计时器）和默认设置中断这种自动反应的潜力。我们没有发现在点击按钮方面存在统计学上的显著差异。我们的研究结果表明，选择加入默认设置显著降低了跟踪技术的使用接受率。这些结果是了解不同轻推概念对用户与跟踪同意通知交互的影响的第一步。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Don’t accept all and continue: Exploring nudges for more deliberate interaction with tracking consent notices

Legal frameworks rely on users to make an informed decision about data collection, e.g., by accepting or declining the use of tracking technologies. In practice, however, users hardly interact with tracking consent notices on a deliberate website per website level, but usually accept or decline optional tracking technologies altogether in a habituated behavior. We explored the potential of three different nudge types (color highlighting, social cue, timer) and default settings to interrupt this auto-response in an experimental between-subject design with 167 participants. We did not find statistically significant differences regarding the buttons clicked. Our results showed that opt-in default settings significantly decrease tracking technology use acceptance rates. These results are a first step towards understanding the effects of different nudging concepts on users’ interaction with tracking consent notices.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 工程技术-计算机：控制论

CiteScore

8.50

自引率

5.40%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： This ACM Transaction seeks to be the premier archival journal in the multidisciplinary field of human-computer interaction. Since its first issue in March 1994, it has presented work of the highest scientific quality that contributes to the practice in the present and future. The primary emphasis is on results of broad application, but the journal considers original work focused on specific domains, on special requirements, on ethical issues -- the full range of design, development, and use of interactive systems.