“短暂的事物”:露西·哈钦森和玛格丽特·卡文迪什歌词中的物质主义与死亡

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
J. Hock
{"title":"“短暂的事物”:露西·哈钦森和玛格丽特·卡文迪什歌词中的物质主义与死亡","authors":"J. Hock","doi":"10.1086/726101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The poetic atomism of Lucretius seems an obvious point of convergence between Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson, but this convergence is complicated both by their later disavowals of atomism and by scholarship that casts doubt on even their early interest in Lucretius. In this essay, I argue that in their lyrics, Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson engage Lucretius in a hybrid and nondogmatic way that is less focused on atomism’s physical system (that is, on the mechanics of atomist physics) than on using ideas from De rerum natura about poetry and mortality to think about memory, memorialization, and afterlives—of bodies, reputations, and texts. Both Cavendish and Hutchinson engage the issues of materiality and mortality at the heart of Lucretian thought as a way of conceptualizing the capacity of lyric poetry to depict the experience of change and loss at the heart of mortal life, the experience of both being and loving what Hutchinson in her elegies calls “transeant Things.” Hutchinson’s appreciation for and dwelling with “transeant Things” carves out a space within her elegies for an affirmation of both erotic love and also of lyric poetry. [J.H.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“transeant Things”: Materialism and Mortality in the Lyrics of Lucy Hutchinson and Margaret Cavendish\",\"authors\":\"J. Hock\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The poetic atomism of Lucretius seems an obvious point of convergence between Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson, but this convergence is complicated both by their later disavowals of atomism and by scholarship that casts doubt on even their early interest in Lucretius. In this essay, I argue that in their lyrics, Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson engage Lucretius in a hybrid and nondogmatic way that is less focused on atomism’s physical system (that is, on the mechanics of atomist physics) than on using ideas from De rerum natura about poetry and mortality to think about memory, memorialization, and afterlives—of bodies, reputations, and texts. Both Cavendish and Hutchinson engage the issues of materiality and mortality at the heart of Lucretian thought as a way of conceptualizing the capacity of lyric poetry to depict the experience of change and loss at the heart of mortal life, the experience of both being and loving what Hutchinson in her elegies calls “transeant Things.” Hutchinson’s appreciation for and dwelling with “transeant Things” carves out a space within her elegies for an affirmation of both erotic love and also of lyric poetry. [J.H.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":44199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726101\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卢克莱修的诗意原子论似乎是玛格丽特·卡文迪许和露西·哈钦森之间的一个明显的趋同点,但这种趋同由于他们后来对原子论的否认以及学术界对他们早期对卢克莱修兴趣的怀疑而变得复杂。在这篇文章中,我认为,在他们的歌词中,玛格丽特·卡文迪什和露西·哈钦森以一种混合的、非逻辑的方式与卢克莱修接触,这种方式与其说关注原子主义的物理系统(即原子物理学的力学),不如说关注利用自然之父关于诗歌和死亡的思想来思考记忆、记忆和余生——身体、名誉和文本。卡文迪许和哈钦森都将物质性和死亡问题作为卢克莱特思想的核心,以此来概念化抒情诗的能力,以描绘人类生活核心的变化和失落的体验,即哈钦森在挽歌中所说的“transeant Things”的存在和爱的体验。哈钦森对“transeant Things”的欣赏和思考在她的挽歌中开辟了一个空间,既肯定了性爱,也肯定了抒情诗。[J.H]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“transeant Things”: Materialism and Mortality in the Lyrics of Lucy Hutchinson and Margaret Cavendish
The poetic atomism of Lucretius seems an obvious point of convergence between Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson, but this convergence is complicated both by their later disavowals of atomism and by scholarship that casts doubt on even their early interest in Lucretius. In this essay, I argue that in their lyrics, Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson engage Lucretius in a hybrid and nondogmatic way that is less focused on atomism’s physical system (that is, on the mechanics of atomist physics) than on using ideas from De rerum natura about poetry and mortality to think about memory, memorialization, and afterlives—of bodies, reputations, and texts. Both Cavendish and Hutchinson engage the issues of materiality and mortality at the heart of Lucretian thought as a way of conceptualizing the capacity of lyric poetry to depict the experience of change and loss at the heart of mortal life, the experience of both being and loving what Hutchinson in her elegies calls “transeant Things.” Hutchinson’s appreciation for and dwelling with “transeant Things” carves out a space within her elegies for an affirmation of both erotic love and also of lyric poetry. [J.H.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信