《埃涅阿斯纪》11.399–409中的一段误解和不必要的删除

IF 0.7 2区历史学 0 CLASSICS

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1086/722561

S. Casali

{"title":"《埃涅阿斯纪》11.399–409中的一段误解和不必要的删除","authors":"S. Casali","doi":"10.1086/722561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note deals with a difficult passage from the speech that Turnus gives to the Italian council in Aeneid 11. In lines 378–409 Turnus replies to Drances’ speech, but the relevance of 403–5 to his argument is not immediately clear. Accordingly, there is currently a consensus among editors and commentators, in whose opinion line 404 should be deleted. This note attempts to demonstrate that the deletion of 404 is not necessary, and that the current consensus interpretation of 403–5 is unsatisfactory.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Misunderstood Passage and an Unnecessary Deletion in Aeneid 11.399–409\",\"authors\":\"S. Casali\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note deals with a difficult passage from the speech that Turnus gives to the Italian council in Aeneid 11. In lines 378–409 Turnus replies to Drances’ speech, but the relevance of 403–5 to his argument is not immediately clear. Accordingly, there is currently a consensus among editors and commentators, in whose opinion line 404 should be deleted. This note attempts to demonstrate that the deletion of 404 is not necessary, and that the current consensus interpretation of 403–5 is unsatisfactory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722561\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这封信讲述了特努斯在《埃涅阿斯纪11》中向意大利议会发表的演讲中的一段艰难的段落。在第378–409行中，Turnus回复了Drance的演讲，但403–5与他的论点的相关性尚不清楚。因此，目前编辑和评论员之间达成了共识，他们的意见线404应该删除。本说明试图证明删除404是不必要的，并且目前对403-5的共识解释是不令人满意的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Misunderstood Passage and an Unnecessary Deletion in Aeneid 11.399–409

This note deals with a difficult passage from the speech that Turnus gives to the Italian council in Aeneid 11. In lines 378–409 Turnus replies to Drances’ speech, but the relevance of 403–5 to his argument is not immediately clear. Accordingly, there is currently a consensus among editors and commentators, in whose opinion line 404 should be deleted. This note attempts to demonstrate that the deletion of 404 is not necessary, and that the current consensus interpretation of 403–5 is unsatisfactory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.