罗马尼亚语和塞尔维亚语科学语篇中的认知与道义情态

Predrag Novakov, Mihaela Lazović
{"title":"罗马尼亚语和塞尔维亚语科学语篇中的认知与道义情态","authors":"Predrag Novakov, Mihaela Lazović","doi":"10.1515/rjes-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Modal verbs expressing epistemic and deontic modality can be used as discourse markers to implicate the authors’ attitude to the propositional content (doubt, certainty, hedging). Based on English modality framework, this paper discusses the uses of modals in expressing author’s attitude in Romanian and Serbian scientific discourse (social sciences and humanities) and compares these uses in the two languages.","PeriodicalId":30681,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of English Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"43 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic and Deontic Modality in Romanian and Serbian Scientific Discourse\",\"authors\":\"Predrag Novakov, Mihaela Lazović\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rjes-2021-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Modal verbs expressing epistemic and deontic modality can be used as discourse markers to implicate the authors’ attitude to the propositional content (doubt, certainty, hedging). Based on English modality framework, this paper discusses the uses of modals in expressing author’s attitude in Romanian and Serbian scientific discourse (social sciences and humanities) and compares these uses in the two languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Journal of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Journal of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rjes-2021-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rjes-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

表达认识情态和道义情态的抽象情态动词可以作为话语标记,暗示作者对命题内容的态度(怀疑、确定、对冲)。基于英语情态框架,本文讨论了罗马尼亚语和塞尔维亚语科学语篇(社会科学和人文学科)中情态词在表达作者态度方面的用法,并对这两种语言中情态词的用法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epistemic and Deontic Modality in Romanian and Serbian Scientific Discourse
Abstract Modal verbs expressing epistemic and deontic modality can be used as discourse markers to implicate the authors’ attitude to the propositional content (doubt, certainty, hedging). Based on English modality framework, this paper discusses the uses of modals in expressing author’s attitude in Romanian and Serbian scientific discourse (social sciences and humanities) and compares these uses in the two languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信