反作用物体构造史上的又一次转折

IF 0.6 3区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Tamara Bouso, Pablo Ruano San Segundo
{"title":"反作用物体构造史上的又一次转折","authors":"Tamara Bouso, Pablo Ruano San Segundo","doi":"10.1075/FOL.20026.BOU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article deals with the Reaction Object Construction (ROC), as in She smiled disbelief, where\n an intransitive verb (smile), by adding an emotional object (disbelief), acquires the extended\n sense “express X by V−ing” (i.e. “She expressed disbelief by smiling”). Earlier research has suggested a diachronic connection\n between the ROC and Direct Discourse Constructions (DDCs) of the type She smiled, “I don’t believe you” (Visser 1963–1973). More recently, Bouso (2018)\n has shown that the ROC is primarily a feature of 19th century narrative fiction. This paper aims to bring together these insights.\n On the basis of a self-compiled corpus and De Smet’s Corpus of English Novels, it investigates the productivity\n of the ROC in 19th and 20th century fiction, and the role of DDCs in its development. The results reveal a peak in the\n productivity of the ROC that coincides with the development of the sentimental novel, and a correlation between the development of\n the ROC on the one hand and of those DDCs that have been mistakenly hypothesised to be its single source constructions on the\n other. Extravagance is proposed as a triggering factor for the use of the ROC in the 19th century as an alternative to DDCs.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another turn of the screw on the history of the reaction object construction\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Bouso, Pablo Ruano San Segundo\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/FOL.20026.BOU\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article deals with the Reaction Object Construction (ROC), as in She smiled disbelief, where\\n an intransitive verb (smile), by adding an emotional object (disbelief), acquires the extended\\n sense “express X by V−ing” (i.e. “She expressed disbelief by smiling”). Earlier research has suggested a diachronic connection\\n between the ROC and Direct Discourse Constructions (DDCs) of the type She smiled, “I don’t believe you” (Visser 1963–1973). More recently, Bouso (2018)\\n has shown that the ROC is primarily a feature of 19th century narrative fiction. This paper aims to bring together these insights.\\n On the basis of a self-compiled corpus and De Smet’s Corpus of English Novels, it investigates the productivity\\n of the ROC in 19th and 20th century fiction, and the role of DDCs in its development. The results reveal a peak in the\\n productivity of the ROC that coincides with the development of the sentimental novel, and a correlation between the development of\\n the ROC on the one hand and of those DDCs that have been mistakenly hypothesised to be its single source constructions on the\\n other. Extravagance is proposed as a triggering factor for the use of the ROC in the 19th century as an alternative to DDCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Functions of Language\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Functions of Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/FOL.20026.BOU\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/FOL.20026.BOU","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文讨论的是反应对象结构(ROC),如在She smile incredible中,不及物动词(smile)通过添加情感对象(incredible)获得引申意义“通过V - ing表达X”(即“她通过微笑表达不相信”)。早期的研究表明,ROC与“她笑了,“我不相信你”这种类型的直接话语结构(ddc)之间存在历时性联系(Visser 1963-1973)。最近,Bouso(2018)表明,ROC主要是19世纪叙事小说的一个特征。本文旨在汇集这些见解。本文以一个自编的语料库和德·斯梅特的英语小说语料库为基础,考察了19世纪和20世纪中华民国小说的生产力,以及ddc在其发展中的作用。结果显示,中华民国的生产力高峰与感伤小说的发展相吻合,并且中华民国的发展与那些被错误地假设为其单一来源结构的ddc之间存在相关性。奢侈被认为是19世纪使用中华民国作为替代ddc的触发因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Another turn of the screw on the history of the reaction object construction
This article deals with the Reaction Object Construction (ROC), as in She smiled disbelief, where an intransitive verb (smile), by adding an emotional object (disbelief), acquires the extended sense “express X by V−ing” (i.e. “She expressed disbelief by smiling”). Earlier research has suggested a diachronic connection between the ROC and Direct Discourse Constructions (DDCs) of the type She smiled, “I don’t believe you” (Visser 1963–1973). More recently, Bouso (2018) has shown that the ROC is primarily a feature of 19th century narrative fiction. This paper aims to bring together these insights. On the basis of a self-compiled corpus and De Smet’s Corpus of English Novels, it investigates the productivity of the ROC in 19th and 20th century fiction, and the role of DDCs in its development. The results reveal a peak in the productivity of the ROC that coincides with the development of the sentimental novel, and a correlation between the development of the ROC on the one hand and of those DDCs that have been mistakenly hypothesised to be its single source constructions on the other. Extravagance is proposed as a triggering factor for the use of the ROC in the 19th century as an alternative to DDCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信