森林在澳大利亚高中课程中是如何体现的?*

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
D. Yao
{"title":"森林在澳大利亚高中课程中是如何体现的?*","authors":"D. Yao","doi":"10.1080/00049158.2019.1681053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education is recognised as a fundamental tool to promote the transformative behavioural change necessary to address contemporary environmental and sustainability challenges, many of which stem from human activities. Forests, and the numerous important benefits they deliver, are under threat from a range of pressures. However, the nexus between education, behaviour and forests is not well understood. Previous research suggests that the relationship between education and behaviour is complex, with various influencing factors. A body of literature has addressed this topic in the context of pro-environmental behaviour. The research reported here investigates the relationship between education and a subset of pro-environment behaviour characterised as pro-forest behaviour. In a case study of the Australian upper secondary school curriculum, this study used qualitative methods to assess the representation of forests in the context of pro-forest behaviour. This was done through document analyses of curriculum texts at the national and state and territory level and interviews of teachers of forest-related courses. Forests were predominantly represented indirectly in Australian course curriculum texts. Forests were typically portrayed in narrow contexts and not necessarily in ways which might underpin pro-forest behaviour. Teachers were identified as critical elements of the education system, able to interpret and build on official course curricula to deliver classes that addressed forests and fostered pro-forest behaviour in greater depth and breadth. These results also suggest, consistent with the sustainability education literature, that education has the potential to foster transformative behaviour. However, this potential is not likely to be fully realised at present for the case of forests in Australian upper secondary education. Strengthening education to support pro-forest behaviour will likely require a broader understanding of pro-forest concepts in Australian education and greater teacher capacity and opportunities to deliver pro-forest learning more effectively.","PeriodicalId":55426,"journal":{"name":"Australian Forestry","volume":"82 1","pages":"191 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049158.2019.1681053","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How are forests represented in Australian senior secondary curricula?*\",\"authors\":\"D. Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049158.2019.1681053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Education is recognised as a fundamental tool to promote the transformative behavioural change necessary to address contemporary environmental and sustainability challenges, many of which stem from human activities. Forests, and the numerous important benefits they deliver, are under threat from a range of pressures. However, the nexus between education, behaviour and forests is not well understood. Previous research suggests that the relationship between education and behaviour is complex, with various influencing factors. A body of literature has addressed this topic in the context of pro-environmental behaviour. The research reported here investigates the relationship between education and a subset of pro-environment behaviour characterised as pro-forest behaviour. In a case study of the Australian upper secondary school curriculum, this study used qualitative methods to assess the representation of forests in the context of pro-forest behaviour. This was done through document analyses of curriculum texts at the national and state and territory level and interviews of teachers of forest-related courses. Forests were predominantly represented indirectly in Australian course curriculum texts. Forests were typically portrayed in narrow contexts and not necessarily in ways which might underpin pro-forest behaviour. Teachers were identified as critical elements of the education system, able to interpret and build on official course curricula to deliver classes that addressed forests and fostered pro-forest behaviour in greater depth and breadth. These results also suggest, consistent with the sustainability education literature, that education has the potential to foster transformative behaviour. However, this potential is not likely to be fully realised at present for the case of forests in Australian upper secondary education. Strengthening education to support pro-forest behaviour will likely require a broader understanding of pro-forest concepts in Australian education and greater teacher capacity and opportunities to deliver pro-forest learning more effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Forestry\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"191 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049158.2019.1681053\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2019.1681053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2019.1681053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教育被认为是促进变革行为的基本工具,这是应对当代环境和可持续性挑战所必需的,其中许多挑战源于人类活动。森林及其带来的许多重要好处正受到一系列压力的威胁。然而,教育、行为和森林之间的关系还没有得到很好的理解。先前的研究表明,教育和行为之间的关系是复杂的,有各种影响因素。许多文献都在环保行为的背景下讨论了这一主题。本文报道的研究调查了教育与一部分亲环境行为(即亲森林行为)之间的关系。在对澳大利亚高中课程的案例研究中,本研究使用了定性方法来评估森林在亲森林行为背景下的代表性。这是通过对国家、州和地区各级课程文本的文件分析以及对森林相关课程教师的访谈来完成的。森林在澳大利亚课程文本中主要是间接出现的。森林通常是在狭窄的背景下描绘的,不一定是以支持亲森林行为的方式描绘的。教师被确定为教育系统的关键要素,能够解释和借鉴官方课程,开设涉及森林的课程,并在更深入和更广泛的范围内培养亲森林行为。这些结果还表明,与可持续发展教育文献一致,教育有可能促进变革行为。然而,就澳大利亚高中教育中的森林而言,这一潜力目前不太可能完全实现。加强教育以支持支持支持森林的行为可能需要更广泛地理解澳大利亚教育中的支持森林的概念,并需要更大的教师能力和机会来更有效地提供支持森林的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How are forests represented in Australian senior secondary curricula?*
Education is recognised as a fundamental tool to promote the transformative behavioural change necessary to address contemporary environmental and sustainability challenges, many of which stem from human activities. Forests, and the numerous important benefits they deliver, are under threat from a range of pressures. However, the nexus between education, behaviour and forests is not well understood. Previous research suggests that the relationship between education and behaviour is complex, with various influencing factors. A body of literature has addressed this topic in the context of pro-environmental behaviour. The research reported here investigates the relationship between education and a subset of pro-environment behaviour characterised as pro-forest behaviour. In a case study of the Australian upper secondary school curriculum, this study used qualitative methods to assess the representation of forests in the context of pro-forest behaviour. This was done through document analyses of curriculum texts at the national and state and territory level and interviews of teachers of forest-related courses. Forests were predominantly represented indirectly in Australian course curriculum texts. Forests were typically portrayed in narrow contexts and not necessarily in ways which might underpin pro-forest behaviour. Teachers were identified as critical elements of the education system, able to interpret and build on official course curricula to deliver classes that addressed forests and fostered pro-forest behaviour in greater depth and breadth. These results also suggest, consistent with the sustainability education literature, that education has the potential to foster transformative behaviour. However, this potential is not likely to be fully realised at present for the case of forests in Australian upper secondary education. Strengthening education to support pro-forest behaviour will likely require a broader understanding of pro-forest concepts in Australian education and greater teacher capacity and opportunities to deliver pro-forest learning more effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Forestry is published by Taylor & Francis for the Institute of Foresters of Australia (IFA) for scientific, technical, and professional communication relating to forestry in the Asia Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信