从英国脱欧与欧盟的贸易谈判中可以吸取的一些教训

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Alan Swinbank
{"title":"从英国脱欧与欧盟的贸易谈判中可以吸取的一些教训","authors":"Alan Swinbank","doi":"10.54648/trad2021022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK-EU negotiations for new arrangements to cover trade in goods, following the UK’s decision to leave the EU, were long and complex. What lessons might politicians, trade negotiators, and academics learn from this long-drawn-out saga? This article focuses on five of the ways in which the UK misplayed, misunderstood, or misrepresented the consequences of Brexit. First, there was no plan for Brexit. Second, the implications for the Irish border and peace progress were not appreciated. Third, World Trade Organization (WTO) rules were not understood. Fourth, by threatening to break international law the UK undermined its credibility as a negotiating partner and increased the EU’s resolve to protect its market. Fifth, Boris Johnson’s unwillingness to acknowledge that leaving the EU’s customs union and Single Market would result in UK-EU trade barriers, distorted debate and raised unfulfilled expectations.\nBrexit, Ireland, EU, WTO, rules of origin, free trade area, customs union","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Lessons that Might Be Learnt from Brexit Britain’s Trade Negotiations with the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Alan Swinbank\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/trad2021022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The UK-EU negotiations for new arrangements to cover trade in goods, following the UK’s decision to leave the EU, were long and complex. What lessons might politicians, trade negotiators, and academics learn from this long-drawn-out saga? This article focuses on five of the ways in which the UK misplayed, misunderstood, or misrepresented the consequences of Brexit. First, there was no plan for Brexit. Second, the implications for the Irish border and peace progress were not appreciated. Third, World Trade Organization (WTO) rules were not understood. Fourth, by threatening to break international law the UK undermined its credibility as a negotiating partner and increased the EU’s resolve to protect its market. Fifth, Boris Johnson’s unwillingness to acknowledge that leaving the EU’s customs union and Single Market would result in UK-EU trade barriers, distorted debate and raised unfulfilled expectations.\\nBrexit, Ireland, EU, WTO, rules of origin, free trade area, customs union\",\"PeriodicalId\":46019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在英国决定离开欧盟之后,英国与欧盟就货物贸易的新安排进行了漫长而复杂的谈判。政治家、贸易谈判代表和学者们能从这场旷日持久的闹剧中学到什么?本文重点讨论了英国误读、误解或歪曲脱欧后果的五种方式。首先,没有脱欧计划。其次,这对爱尔兰边界和和平进程的影响没有得到重视。第三,不理解世界贸易组织(WTO)的规则。第四,英国威胁要违反国际法,损害了其作为谈判伙伴的信誉,增强了欧盟保护其市场的决心。第五,鲍里斯•约翰逊(Boris Johnson)不愿承认,离开欧盟关税同盟和单一市场将导致英国与欧盟之间的贸易壁垒、扭曲辩论和提高无法实现的期望。英国脱欧,爱尔兰,欧盟,WTO,原产地规则,自由贸易区,关税同盟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some Lessons that Might Be Learnt from Brexit Britain’s Trade Negotiations with the European Union
The UK-EU negotiations for new arrangements to cover trade in goods, following the UK’s decision to leave the EU, were long and complex. What lessons might politicians, trade negotiators, and academics learn from this long-drawn-out saga? This article focuses on five of the ways in which the UK misplayed, misunderstood, or misrepresented the consequences of Brexit. First, there was no plan for Brexit. Second, the implications for the Irish border and peace progress were not appreciated. Third, World Trade Organization (WTO) rules were not understood. Fourth, by threatening to break international law the UK undermined its credibility as a negotiating partner and increased the EU’s resolve to protect its market. Fifth, Boris Johnson’s unwillingness to acknowledge that leaving the EU’s customs union and Single Market would result in UK-EU trade barriers, distorted debate and raised unfulfilled expectations. Brexit, Ireland, EU, WTO, rules of origin, free trade area, customs union
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信