Kyle R. Russell, P. Dotray, G. Ritchie, Brendan R. Kelly
{"title":"2,4- d胆碱对敏感棉结实的影响","authors":"Kyle R. Russell, P. Dotray, G. Ritchie, Brendan R. Kelly","doi":"10.1017/wet.2023.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With the increase in hectares planted to auxin-resistant cotton, the number of preplant, at-plant, and post plant applications of dicamba and 2,4-D choline to aid in the control of troublesome broadleaf weeds including glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth has increased. More dicamba and 2,4-D choline applications means an increased risk of off-target movement. Field studies were conducted in 2019-2021 at the Texas Tech University New Deal Research Farm to evaluate dicamba-resistant cotton response to various rates of 2,4-D choline when applied at four growth stages [first square (FS) + 2 weeks (wk), first bloom (FB), FB + 2 wk, and FB + 4 wk]. Applications of 2,4-D choline were applied at 1060 (1x), 106 (1/10x), 21 (1/50x), 10.6 (1/100x), 2.1 (1/500x), and 1.06 (1/1000x) g ae ha-1 to Deltapine 1822 XF cotton. Relative to the non-treated control, yield losses were observed in all years at FS + 2 wk and FB from rates of 2,4-D choline ≥ 1/100x. At the FB + 4 wk application, only the 1x rate of 2,4-D choline resulted in a yield reduction in all three years. Micronaire, fiber length, and uniformity were negatively influenced by the 1/10X and 1X rates of 2,4-D choline at various timings in 2019, 2020, and 2021. In addition, short fiber content, neps, and seed coat neps increased where micronaire, fiber length, and uniformity were negatively impacted.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of 2,4-D choline on fruiting in sensitive cotton\",\"authors\":\"Kyle R. Russell, P. Dotray, G. Ritchie, Brendan R. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/wet.2023.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n With the increase in hectares planted to auxin-resistant cotton, the number of preplant, at-plant, and post plant applications of dicamba and 2,4-D choline to aid in the control of troublesome broadleaf weeds including glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth has increased. More dicamba and 2,4-D choline applications means an increased risk of off-target movement. Field studies were conducted in 2019-2021 at the Texas Tech University New Deal Research Farm to evaluate dicamba-resistant cotton response to various rates of 2,4-D choline when applied at four growth stages [first square (FS) + 2 weeks (wk), first bloom (FB), FB + 2 wk, and FB + 4 wk]. Applications of 2,4-D choline were applied at 1060 (1x), 106 (1/10x), 21 (1/50x), 10.6 (1/100x), 2.1 (1/500x), and 1.06 (1/1000x) g ae ha-1 to Deltapine 1822 XF cotton. Relative to the non-treated control, yield losses were observed in all years at FS + 2 wk and FB from rates of 2,4-D choline ≥ 1/100x. At the FB + 4 wk application, only the 1x rate of 2,4-D choline resulted in a yield reduction in all three years. Micronaire, fiber length, and uniformity were negatively influenced by the 1/10X and 1X rates of 2,4-D choline at various timings in 2019, 2020, and 2021. In addition, short fiber content, neps, and seed coat neps increased where micronaire, fiber length, and uniformity were negatively impacted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weed Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weed Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.38\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.38","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of 2,4-D choline on fruiting in sensitive cotton
With the increase in hectares planted to auxin-resistant cotton, the number of preplant, at-plant, and post plant applications of dicamba and 2,4-D choline to aid in the control of troublesome broadleaf weeds including glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth has increased. More dicamba and 2,4-D choline applications means an increased risk of off-target movement. Field studies were conducted in 2019-2021 at the Texas Tech University New Deal Research Farm to evaluate dicamba-resistant cotton response to various rates of 2,4-D choline when applied at four growth stages [first square (FS) + 2 weeks (wk), first bloom (FB), FB + 2 wk, and FB + 4 wk]. Applications of 2,4-D choline were applied at 1060 (1x), 106 (1/10x), 21 (1/50x), 10.6 (1/100x), 2.1 (1/500x), and 1.06 (1/1000x) g ae ha-1 to Deltapine 1822 XF cotton. Relative to the non-treated control, yield losses were observed in all years at FS + 2 wk and FB from rates of 2,4-D choline ≥ 1/100x. At the FB + 4 wk application, only the 1x rate of 2,4-D choline resulted in a yield reduction in all three years. Micronaire, fiber length, and uniformity were negatively influenced by the 1/10X and 1X rates of 2,4-D choline at various timings in 2019, 2020, and 2021. In addition, short fiber content, neps, and seed coat neps increased where micronaire, fiber length, and uniformity were negatively impacted.
期刊介绍:
Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed.
The journal focuses on:
- Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems
- Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control
- Weed/crop management systems
- Reports of new weed problems
-New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control
-Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations.
-Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered