急性护理儿科物理治疗师使用患者报告的结果测量方法

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
Dana Tischler, Janine Wood, M. Shotwell, W. Pitney, Cade Mooney
{"title":"急性护理儿科物理治疗师使用患者报告的结果测量方法","authors":"Dana Tischler, Janine Wood, M. Shotwell, W. Pitney, Cade Mooney","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To describe the current use of and perceived benefits and barriers to using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by pediatric physical therapists (PTs) in the acute care setting and to explore demographic factors that may explain the use of PROMs. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who work in a pediatric acute care setting. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the frequency of PROM use, identify differences in PROM use based on demographic factors, and evaluate the likelihood of various benefits and barriers. Open-ended survey responses were analyzed inductively to identify common themes. Results: The survey was completed by a convenience sample of 92 pediatric acute care PTs (30% response rate). Half of the respondents (n = 46; 50%) reported “rarely” or “never” using PROMs, while only 4.3% (n = 4) reported “always” using PROMs. No significant differences were found in the frequency of PROM between years of experience, entry-level degree, clinical specialization, or other demographic factors. Participants were “somewhat” or “extremely likely” to use the rate of perceived exertion (71%), the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (24%), and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (17%). The primary facilitator was improving communication with patients (68%), while the main barrier was lack of availability (57%). Thematic analysis of open-ended responses indicated that the benefits of using PROMs include improving communication, providing objective data, and measuring progress. Barriers identified include inadequate resources, lack of time, and irrelevance to clinical practice. Conclusion: Many pediatric acute care PTs underutilize PROMs, with reported barriers of limited access and lack of time hindering implementation within the pediatric acute care setting. Survey respondents reported the desire to measure health-related quality of life and participation, which may be feasible through future quality improvement or knowledge translation initiatives.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Use by Acute Care Pediatric Physical Therapists\",\"authors\":\"Dana Tischler, Janine Wood, M. Shotwell, W. Pitney, Cade Mooney\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To describe the current use of and perceived benefits and barriers to using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by pediatric physical therapists (PTs) in the acute care setting and to explore demographic factors that may explain the use of PROMs. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who work in a pediatric acute care setting. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the frequency of PROM use, identify differences in PROM use based on demographic factors, and evaluate the likelihood of various benefits and barriers. Open-ended survey responses were analyzed inductively to identify common themes. Results: The survey was completed by a convenience sample of 92 pediatric acute care PTs (30% response rate). Half of the respondents (n = 46; 50%) reported “rarely” or “never” using PROMs, while only 4.3% (n = 4) reported “always” using PROMs. No significant differences were found in the frequency of PROM between years of experience, entry-level degree, clinical specialization, or other demographic factors. Participants were “somewhat” or “extremely likely” to use the rate of perceived exertion (71%), the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (24%), and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (17%). The primary facilitator was improving communication with patients (68%), while the main barrier was lack of availability (57%). Thematic analysis of open-ended responses indicated that the benefits of using PROMs include improving communication, providing objective data, and measuring progress. Barriers identified include inadequate resources, lack of time, and irrelevance to clinical practice. Conclusion: Many pediatric acute care PTs underutilize PROMs, with reported barriers of limited access and lack of time hindering implementation within the pediatric acute care setting. Survey respondents reported the desire to measure health-related quality of life and participation, which may be feasible through future quality improvement or knowledge translation initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:描述儿科物理治疗师(PT)在急性护理环境中使用患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的现状、感知的益处和障碍,并探讨可能解释PROMs使用的人口统计学因素。方法:将一份电子调查分发给在儿科急性护理环境中工作的PT。描述性统计用于评估胎膜早破的使用频率,根据人口统计学因素确定胎膜早闭使用的差异,并评估各种益处和障碍的可能性。对不限成员名额调查的答复进行归纳分析,以确定共同主题。结果:调查是通过92个儿科急性护理PT的方便样本完成的(30%的应答率)。一半的受访者(n=46;50%)表示“很少”或“从未”使用PROM,而只有4.3%(n=4)表示“总是”使用PROM。在胎膜早破的发生率方面,经验年限、入门级学位、临床专业或其他人口统计学因素之间没有发现显著差异。参与者“有点”或“极有可能”使用感知用力率(71%)、年龄和阶段问卷(24%)和儿童生活质量问卷(17%)。主要促进因素是改善与患者的沟通(68%),而主要障碍是缺乏可用性(57%)。对开放式答复的专题分析表明,使用PROM的好处包括改善沟通、提供客观数据和衡量进展。确定的障碍包括资源不足、时间不足以及与临床实践无关。结论:许多儿科急性护理PT未充分利用PROM,据报道,在儿科急性护理环境中,使用受限和缺乏时间的障碍阻碍了PROM的实施。调查对象报告说,他们希望衡量与健康相关的生活质量和参与度,这可能通过未来的质量改进或知识翻译举措来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Use by Acute Care Pediatric Physical Therapists
Purpose: To describe the current use of and perceived benefits and barriers to using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by pediatric physical therapists (PTs) in the acute care setting and to explore demographic factors that may explain the use of PROMs. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who work in a pediatric acute care setting. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the frequency of PROM use, identify differences in PROM use based on demographic factors, and evaluate the likelihood of various benefits and barriers. Open-ended survey responses were analyzed inductively to identify common themes. Results: The survey was completed by a convenience sample of 92 pediatric acute care PTs (30% response rate). Half of the respondents (n = 46; 50%) reported “rarely” or “never” using PROMs, while only 4.3% (n = 4) reported “always” using PROMs. No significant differences were found in the frequency of PROM between years of experience, entry-level degree, clinical specialization, or other demographic factors. Participants were “somewhat” or “extremely likely” to use the rate of perceived exertion (71%), the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (24%), and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (17%). The primary facilitator was improving communication with patients (68%), while the main barrier was lack of availability (57%). Thematic analysis of open-ended responses indicated that the benefits of using PROMs include improving communication, providing objective data, and measuring progress. Barriers identified include inadequate resources, lack of time, and irrelevance to clinical practice. Conclusion: Many pediatric acute care PTs underutilize PROMs, with reported barriers of limited access and lack of time hindering implementation within the pediatric acute care setting. Survey respondents reported the desire to measure health-related quality of life and participation, which may be feasible through future quality improvement or knowledge translation initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信