职前与在职小学教师在几何任务情境下的数学推理过程知识

Q3 Multidisciplinary
Lina Brunheira, Lurdes Serrazina, Margarida Rodrigues
{"title":"职前与在职小学教师在几何任务情境下的数学推理过程知识","authors":"Lina Brunheira, Lurdes Serrazina, Margarida Rodrigues","doi":"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Teachers’ knowledge of mathematical reasoning and how to foster it in pupils influence the way they plan and conduct their lessons. In geometry, it implies developing visualisation and spatial structuring. Objectives: This article addresses the knowledge of the preservice and in-service primary teachers about reasoning processes, namely the way they relate several reasoning processes when solving a didactical task involving geometry. Design: The study reported here followed a qualitative-interpretative approach, adopting a design-based research modality. Setting and Participants: The teacher education experiments were developed with 31 preservice primary teachers and 19 in-service teachers of grades 1 to 6. The participants were not selected since they were the unique classes of pre- and in-service primary teachers in the institution. Data collection and analysis: Data were collected by audio and video records of lessons, participant observation and the collection of written records of the preservice teachers. We used content analysis of the data using the framework we elaborated on before concerned with knowledge of reasoning processes. Results: The preservice teachers identified the process of generalising, relating it with comparing and exemplifying processes. Regarding the process of justifying, participants used the association to understand why a relationship works as a selection criterion for that process. On the contrary, the distinction between justifying and generalising appeared to be more difficult for in-service teachers. Conclusions: Collaborative work on didactical tasks that are supported by relevant mathematical tasks and real classroom episodes are promising scenarios to develop teachers’ knowledge about mathematical reasoning.","PeriodicalId":36967,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preservice and In-Service Primary Teachers’ Knowledge of Mathematical Reasoning Processes in the Context of a Geometry Task\",\"authors\":\"Lina Brunheira, Lurdes Serrazina, Margarida Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Teachers’ knowledge of mathematical reasoning and how to foster it in pupils influence the way they plan and conduct their lessons. In geometry, it implies developing visualisation and spatial structuring. Objectives: This article addresses the knowledge of the preservice and in-service primary teachers about reasoning processes, namely the way they relate several reasoning processes when solving a didactical task involving geometry. Design: The study reported here followed a qualitative-interpretative approach, adopting a design-based research modality. Setting and Participants: The teacher education experiments were developed with 31 preservice primary teachers and 19 in-service teachers of grades 1 to 6. The participants were not selected since they were the unique classes of pre- and in-service primary teachers in the institution. Data collection and analysis: Data were collected by audio and video records of lessons, participant observation and the collection of written records of the preservice teachers. We used content analysis of the data using the framework we elaborated on before concerned with knowledge of reasoning processes. Results: The preservice teachers identified the process of generalising, relating it with comparing and exemplifying processes. Regarding the process of justifying, participants used the association to understand why a relationship works as a selection criterion for that process. On the contrary, the distinction between justifying and generalising appeared to be more difficult for in-service teachers. Conclusions: Collaborative work on didactical tasks that are supported by relevant mathematical tasks and real classroom episodes are promising scenarios to develop teachers’ knowledge about mathematical reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Scientiae\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Scientiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:教师对数学推理的了解以及如何在学生中培养数学推理,会影响他们计划和指导课程的方式。在几何学中,它意味着发展可视化和空间结构。目的:本文介绍了职前和在职小学教师关于推理过程的知识,即他们在解决涉及几何的教学任务时如何将几个推理过程联系起来。设计:本文报告的研究采用了定性解释方法,采用了基于设计的研究模式。设置和参与者:教师教育实验由31名小学一年级至六年级的职前教师和19名在职教师进行。参与者没有被选中,因为他们是该机构学前和在职小学教师的独特班级。数据收集和分析:通过课堂录音录像、参与者观察和职前教师书面记录收集数据。我们使用之前详细阐述的关于推理过程知识的框架对数据进行内容分析。结果:职前教师识别了概括过程,并将其与比较和例证过程联系起来。关于证明过程,参与者利用关联来理解为什么一段关系可以作为该过程的选择标准。相反,在职教师似乎更难区分论证和概括。结论:在相关数学任务和真实课堂事件的支持下,在教学任务上的合作是发展教师数学推理知识的有希望的场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preservice and In-Service Primary Teachers’ Knowledge of Mathematical Reasoning Processes in the Context of a Geometry Task
Background: Teachers’ knowledge of mathematical reasoning and how to foster it in pupils influence the way they plan and conduct their lessons. In geometry, it implies developing visualisation and spatial structuring. Objectives: This article addresses the knowledge of the preservice and in-service primary teachers about reasoning processes, namely the way they relate several reasoning processes when solving a didactical task involving geometry. Design: The study reported here followed a qualitative-interpretative approach, adopting a design-based research modality. Setting and Participants: The teacher education experiments were developed with 31 preservice primary teachers and 19 in-service teachers of grades 1 to 6. The participants were not selected since they were the unique classes of pre- and in-service primary teachers in the institution. Data collection and analysis: Data were collected by audio and video records of lessons, participant observation and the collection of written records of the preservice teachers. We used content analysis of the data using the framework we elaborated on before concerned with knowledge of reasoning processes. Results: The preservice teachers identified the process of generalising, relating it with comparing and exemplifying processes. Regarding the process of justifying, participants used the association to understand why a relationship works as a selection criterion for that process. On the contrary, the distinction between justifying and generalising appeared to be more difficult for in-service teachers. Conclusions: Collaborative work on didactical tasks that are supported by relevant mathematical tasks and real classroom episodes are promising scenarios to develop teachers’ knowledge about mathematical reasoning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiae
Acta Scientiae Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信