TERF逻辑是抽象逻辑:走向性别批判运动的废除或作为教学实践的黑人跨性别生活

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Qui D. Alexander
{"title":"TERF逻辑是抽象逻辑:走向性别批判运动的废除或作为教学实践的黑人跨性别生活","authors":"Qui D. Alexander","doi":"10.1080/07491409.2023.2193543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When people think of abolition, there is usually an immediate association with police and prisons. Sociopolitical associations with abolition have changed over time, from the historical struggle to abolish slavery to contemporary political movements for the abolition of the prison-industrial complex. While today the word abolition triggers many different reactions within the current political imagination, what is often overlooked is abolition’s connection to gender-critical movements. One might assume this connection is about the “abolition of gender,” something gender-critical feminists both fear and use as rationalization for discrimination (Bassi & LaFleur, 2022). While it could be argued that the abolition of gender is part of a larger political project that resists and refuses the violence of the gender binary, the purpose of this article is to draw attention to the ways in which the logics of trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) (Hines, 2020; Pearce, Erikainen, & Vincent, 2020) and the logics of the prison-industrial complex overlap. Simply put: TERF logics are carceral logics. In this article, I argue that abolitionist praxis can be used as a framework to identify and deconstruct the entanglement of TERF and carceral logics. This article explores the ways in which TERF logics and carceral logics overlap; how both carcerality and TERF logics rely on white supremacist constructions of personhood; and how Black trans life embodies the pedagogical potential to both resist and refuse the larger project of carcerality on which gender-critical movements rely (Graff, Kapur, & Walters, 2019). Carceral logics are the ideas, beliefs, and practices teaching us that punishment is the only way to deal with societal harm. The United States has built entire institutions around this particular ideology of punishment, which are meant to (and which are presented as the only resource to) protect society from violence. Without attempting to address the root causes of violence, police and prisons as systems of punishment have become acceptable institutional mechanisms used to maintain social control. TERF logics operate in similar ways, creating systems of gender that are based on punitive ways of being. Gender as a social category is one that has historically been policed (Spade, 2015; Stanley & Smith, 2015; Sudbury, 2009). Carcerality as a cultural norm is used to manage gender variance, or rather the discursive construction of gender difference in criminalized terms. As police and prisons are presented as the only appropriate tool to address","PeriodicalId":46136,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies in Communication","volume":"46 1","pages":"230 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TERF Logics Are Carceral Logics: Toward the Abolition of Gender-Critical Movements or Black Trans Life as Pedagogical Praxis\",\"authors\":\"Qui D. Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07491409.2023.2193543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When people think of abolition, there is usually an immediate association with police and prisons. Sociopolitical associations with abolition have changed over time, from the historical struggle to abolish slavery to contemporary political movements for the abolition of the prison-industrial complex. While today the word abolition triggers many different reactions within the current political imagination, what is often overlooked is abolition’s connection to gender-critical movements. One might assume this connection is about the “abolition of gender,” something gender-critical feminists both fear and use as rationalization for discrimination (Bassi & LaFleur, 2022). While it could be argued that the abolition of gender is part of a larger political project that resists and refuses the violence of the gender binary, the purpose of this article is to draw attention to the ways in which the logics of trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) (Hines, 2020; Pearce, Erikainen, & Vincent, 2020) and the logics of the prison-industrial complex overlap. Simply put: TERF logics are carceral logics. In this article, I argue that abolitionist praxis can be used as a framework to identify and deconstruct the entanglement of TERF and carceral logics. This article explores the ways in which TERF logics and carceral logics overlap; how both carcerality and TERF logics rely on white supremacist constructions of personhood; and how Black trans life embodies the pedagogical potential to both resist and refuse the larger project of carcerality on which gender-critical movements rely (Graff, Kapur, & Walters, 2019). Carceral logics are the ideas, beliefs, and practices teaching us that punishment is the only way to deal with societal harm. The United States has built entire institutions around this particular ideology of punishment, which are meant to (and which are presented as the only resource to) protect society from violence. Without attempting to address the root causes of violence, police and prisons as systems of punishment have become acceptable institutional mechanisms used to maintain social control. TERF logics operate in similar ways, creating systems of gender that are based on punitive ways of being. Gender as a social category is one that has historically been policed (Spade, 2015; Stanley & Smith, 2015; Sudbury, 2009). Carcerality as a cultural norm is used to manage gender variance, or rather the discursive construction of gender difference in criminalized terms. As police and prisons are presented as the only appropriate tool to address\",\"PeriodicalId\":46136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies in Communication\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"230 - 234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies in Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2023.2193543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2023.2193543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当人们想到废除死刑时,通常会立即联想到警察和监狱。随着时间的推移,废除奴隶制的社会政治联系发生了变化,从废除奴隶制的历史斗争到废除监狱-工业综合体的当代政治运动。虽然今天,废奴一词在当前的政治想象中引发了许多不同的反应,但经常被忽视的是废奴与性别批判运动的联系。人们可能会认为这种联系是关于“废除性别”,这是性别批判女权主义者既害怕又用来作为歧视合理化的东西(Bassi & LaFleur, 2022)。虽然可以认为,废除性别是抵制和拒绝性别二元暴力的更大政治项目的一部分,但本文的目的是提请人们注意跨排斥性激进女权主义(TERF)的逻辑(Hines, 2020;Pearce, Erikainen, & Vincent, 2020)和监狱-工业综合体的逻辑重叠。简单地说:TERF逻辑是物理逻辑。在本文中,我认为废除主义实践可以作为一个框架来识别和解构TERF和carceral逻辑的纠缠。本文探讨了TERF逻辑和caral逻辑重叠的方式;残忍和TERF逻辑如何依赖于白人至上主义的人格建构;以及黑人跨性别生活如何体现了抵抗和拒绝性别批判运动所依赖的更大的残酷项目的教学潜力(格拉夫、卡普尔和沃尔特斯,2019)。刑罚逻辑是教导我们惩罚是处理社会危害的唯一方法的思想、信仰和实践。美国围绕这种惩罚的特殊意识形态建立了一整套制度,旨在(也被视为唯一的资源)保护社会免受暴力侵害。没有试图解决暴力的根源,警察和监狱作为惩罚制度已成为可接受的用于维持社会控制的体制机制。TERF逻辑以类似的方式运作,创造了基于惩罚性存在方式的性别系统。性别作为一个社会类别,历来受到监管(Spade, 2015;Stanley & Smith, 2015;萨德伯里,2009)。残忍作为一种文化规范被用来管理性别差异,或者更确切地说,是用犯罪化的术语对性别差异进行话语建构。由于警察和监狱被认为是解决问题的唯一适当工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TERF Logics Are Carceral Logics: Toward the Abolition of Gender-Critical Movements or Black Trans Life as Pedagogical Praxis
When people think of abolition, there is usually an immediate association with police and prisons. Sociopolitical associations with abolition have changed over time, from the historical struggle to abolish slavery to contemporary political movements for the abolition of the prison-industrial complex. While today the word abolition triggers many different reactions within the current political imagination, what is often overlooked is abolition’s connection to gender-critical movements. One might assume this connection is about the “abolition of gender,” something gender-critical feminists both fear and use as rationalization for discrimination (Bassi & LaFleur, 2022). While it could be argued that the abolition of gender is part of a larger political project that resists and refuses the violence of the gender binary, the purpose of this article is to draw attention to the ways in which the logics of trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) (Hines, 2020; Pearce, Erikainen, & Vincent, 2020) and the logics of the prison-industrial complex overlap. Simply put: TERF logics are carceral logics. In this article, I argue that abolitionist praxis can be used as a framework to identify and deconstruct the entanglement of TERF and carceral logics. This article explores the ways in which TERF logics and carceral logics overlap; how both carcerality and TERF logics rely on white supremacist constructions of personhood; and how Black trans life embodies the pedagogical potential to both resist and refuse the larger project of carcerality on which gender-critical movements rely (Graff, Kapur, & Walters, 2019). Carceral logics are the ideas, beliefs, and practices teaching us that punishment is the only way to deal with societal harm. The United States has built entire institutions around this particular ideology of punishment, which are meant to (and which are presented as the only resource to) protect society from violence. Without attempting to address the root causes of violence, police and prisons as systems of punishment have become acceptable institutional mechanisms used to maintain social control. TERF logics operate in similar ways, creating systems of gender that are based on punitive ways of being. Gender as a social category is one that has historically been policed (Spade, 2015; Stanley & Smith, 2015; Sudbury, 2009). Carcerality as a cultural norm is used to manage gender variance, or rather the discursive construction of gender difference in criminalized terms. As police and prisons are presented as the only appropriate tool to address
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信