{"title":"碳税调整值","authors":"David Blitz, T. Hoogteijling","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3974773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors examine the effects of incorporating a potential tax on carbon emissions into a value investment strategy. They show that in a portfolio optimization problem, a carbon tax at the stock level is mathematically equivalent to a carbon constraint at the portfolio level. Using this insight, the authors derive a value–carbon efficient frontier that reflects the trade-off between a high value exposure and a low carbon footprint. Empirically, they find that carbon taxes up to $100, corresponding to a portfolio carbon footprint reduction of about 50%, have little effect on the characteristics and performance of the long side of a value strategy. More aggressive footprint reduction targets require progressively higher, less realistic carbon tax levels that do erode the magnitude of the value premium.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":"48 1","pages":"121 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon-Tax-Adjusted Value\",\"authors\":\"David Blitz, T. Hoogteijling\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3974773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors examine the effects of incorporating a potential tax on carbon emissions into a value investment strategy. They show that in a portfolio optimization problem, a carbon tax at the stock level is mathematically equivalent to a carbon constraint at the portfolio level. Using this insight, the authors derive a value–carbon efficient frontier that reflects the trade-off between a high value exposure and a low carbon footprint. Empirically, they find that carbon taxes up to $100, corresponding to a portfolio carbon footprint reduction of about 50%, have little effect on the characteristics and performance of the long side of a value strategy. More aggressive footprint reduction targets require progressively higher, less realistic carbon tax levels that do erode the magnitude of the value premium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSRN\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSRN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3974773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3974773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors examine the effects of incorporating a potential tax on carbon emissions into a value investment strategy. They show that in a portfolio optimization problem, a carbon tax at the stock level is mathematically equivalent to a carbon constraint at the portfolio level. Using this insight, the authors derive a value–carbon efficient frontier that reflects the trade-off between a high value exposure and a low carbon footprint. Empirically, they find that carbon taxes up to $100, corresponding to a portfolio carbon footprint reduction of about 50%, have little effect on the characteristics and performance of the long side of a value strategy. More aggressive footprint reduction targets require progressively higher, less realistic carbon tax levels that do erode the magnitude of the value premium.