英格兰和威尔士的法律教育:下一步是什么?

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
P. Leighton
{"title":"英格兰和威尔士的法律教育:下一步是什么?","authors":"P. Leighton","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2021.1939975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution takes a reflective look at the evolution and characteristics of “modern” legal education and also at some contemporary challenges. It is timely, given that 2021 is the 50th anniversary of the Ormrod Report on Legal Education, which marked the beginning of its modern era. However, today legal education in England and Wales is now facing many issues, ranging from the fallout of Covid-19 and a predicted global recession, the outcomes of Brexit, recently announced likely cuts in university funding, possible declines in research support and collaboration along with the implications of the recent EU–UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement for professional legal education and legal services provision more generally. However, just as important has been a build-up of criticisms of universities, which the Ormrod Report had recommended should play the key role in legal education, with some critics challenging the fundamentals of their role and practices. Others have concerns about the “massification”, “marketisation” and the extent to which universities are sufficiently accountable, not least to students. This contribution to Policy and Education Developments explores some of these criticisms but in the context of the distinctive features of legal education in England and Wales. This contribution concludes with some thoughts on the possible responses of law schools and law teachers to this wide range of challenges.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":"55 1","pages":"405 - 413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03069400.2021.1939975","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal education in England and Wales: what next?\",\"authors\":\"P. Leighton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03069400.2021.1939975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution takes a reflective look at the evolution and characteristics of “modern” legal education and also at some contemporary challenges. It is timely, given that 2021 is the 50th anniversary of the Ormrod Report on Legal Education, which marked the beginning of its modern era. However, today legal education in England and Wales is now facing many issues, ranging from the fallout of Covid-19 and a predicted global recession, the outcomes of Brexit, recently announced likely cuts in university funding, possible declines in research support and collaboration along with the implications of the recent EU–UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement for professional legal education and legal services provision more generally. However, just as important has been a build-up of criticisms of universities, which the Ormrod Report had recommended should play the key role in legal education, with some critics challenging the fundamentals of their role and practices. Others have concerns about the “massification”, “marketisation” and the extent to which universities are sufficiently accountable, not least to students. This contribution to Policy and Education Developments explores some of these criticisms but in the context of the distinctive features of legal education in England and Wales. This contribution concludes with some thoughts on the possible responses of law schools and law teachers to this wide range of challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"405 - 413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03069400.2021.1939975\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1939975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1939975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章反思了“现代”法律教育的演变和特点,也反思了当代的一些挑战。这是及时的,因为2021年是《奥姆罗德法律教育报告》50周年,该报告标志着其现代时代的开始。然而,今天,英格兰和威尔士的法律教育现在面临着许多问题,从新冠肺炎的影响和预计的全球经济衰退,英国脱欧的结果,最近宣布的可能削减大学资金,研究支持和合作的可能下降,以及最近的《欧盟-英国贸易与合作协议》对专业法律教育和法律服务提供的影响。然而,同样重要的是,对大学的批评不断增加,奥姆罗德报告建议大学在法律教育中发挥关键作用,一些批评人士对大学的作用和做法的基本原理提出了质疑。其他人则担心“大众化”、“市场化”以及大学在多大程度上对学生负责。这篇对《政策与教育发展》的贡献探讨了其中的一些批评,但结合了英格兰和威尔士法律教育的独特特点。本文最后对法学院和法律教师应对这一广泛挑战的可能对策进行了一些思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal education in England and Wales: what next?
This contribution takes a reflective look at the evolution and characteristics of “modern” legal education and also at some contemporary challenges. It is timely, given that 2021 is the 50th anniversary of the Ormrod Report on Legal Education, which marked the beginning of its modern era. However, today legal education in England and Wales is now facing many issues, ranging from the fallout of Covid-19 and a predicted global recession, the outcomes of Brexit, recently announced likely cuts in university funding, possible declines in research support and collaboration along with the implications of the recent EU–UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement for professional legal education and legal services provision more generally. However, just as important has been a build-up of criticisms of universities, which the Ormrod Report had recommended should play the key role in legal education, with some critics challenging the fundamentals of their role and practices. Others have concerns about the “massification”, “marketisation” and the extent to which universities are sufficiently accountable, not least to students. This contribution to Policy and Education Developments explores some of these criticisms but in the context of the distinctive features of legal education in England and Wales. This contribution concludes with some thoughts on the possible responses of law schools and law teachers to this wide range of challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Law Teacher
Law Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信