老年急诊医学评估后的患者体验

Jessica Kuxhause, Natalie Liogas, S. Keene, R. Fisher, Lauren Cameron Comasco
{"title":"老年急诊医学评估后的患者体验","authors":"Jessica Kuxhause, Natalie Liogas, S. Keene, R. Fisher, Lauren Cameron Comasco","doi":"10.17294/2694-4715.1048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The geriatric population is increasing in size and is expected to represent 20% of the United States population by 2030 per US census data estimates, with an expectant increase in geriatric emergency department (ED) visits. 1 Prior research has demonstrated older adults evaluated in the ED are more likely to have an increased length of stay, more diagnostic tests, and higher overall costs than their younger counterparts, but despite consuming greater resources and staff time, older adults are still more likely to be dissatisfied with their treatment outcomes and less likely to feel that their presenting complaint has been resolved. 2,4 In 2013 the American Academy of Emergency Physicians began a formal accrediting process for Geriatric Emergency Departments, 3 and the Beaumont Royal Oak ED implemented a Geriatric Assessment Team (GAT) while in the process of obtaining this accreditation. The primary objective of this qualitative study was to assess the older patient’s experience and perception of the care they received in the emergency department after evaluation by the Geriatric Assessment Team and determine if patients would recommend the continuation of this program. Methods Patients aged 65 and older that do not live in a nursing home and presented to the ED from the community Monday through Friday between 9 AM to 5 PM were screened using the Identifying Seniors at Risk Questionnaire. Those who scored 2 or higher underwent additional testing to further assess cognition, fall risk, risk of polypharmacy. Patients who screened positive on any of these tests received additional care coordination including physical and occupational therapy evaluations, home care, and medical equipment. When workup was completed, a 6-question survey was administered to assess satisfaction with the program elements on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), with opportunity to provide additional comments. Results From November 2020 through May 2021, 258 surveys were collected. The average age of responders was 79 and 40% of responders identified as male. 46.1% of surveyed patients were discharged, 34% admitted, 18% placed in the observation unit, 1.6% were discharged directly to a subacute rehab facility,","PeriodicalId":73757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Experience After Geriatric Emergency Medicine Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Kuxhause, Natalie Liogas, S. Keene, R. Fisher, Lauren Cameron Comasco\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2694-4715.1048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The geriatric population is increasing in size and is expected to represent 20% of the United States population by 2030 per US census data estimates, with an expectant increase in geriatric emergency department (ED) visits. 1 Prior research has demonstrated older adults evaluated in the ED are more likely to have an increased length of stay, more diagnostic tests, and higher overall costs than their younger counterparts, but despite consuming greater resources and staff time, older adults are still more likely to be dissatisfied with their treatment outcomes and less likely to feel that their presenting complaint has been resolved. 2,4 In 2013 the American Academy of Emergency Physicians began a formal accrediting process for Geriatric Emergency Departments, 3 and the Beaumont Royal Oak ED implemented a Geriatric Assessment Team (GAT) while in the process of obtaining this accreditation. The primary objective of this qualitative study was to assess the older patient’s experience and perception of the care they received in the emergency department after evaluation by the Geriatric Assessment Team and determine if patients would recommend the continuation of this program. Methods Patients aged 65 and older that do not live in a nursing home and presented to the ED from the community Monday through Friday between 9 AM to 5 PM were screened using the Identifying Seniors at Risk Questionnaire. Those who scored 2 or higher underwent additional testing to further assess cognition, fall risk, risk of polypharmacy. Patients who screened positive on any of these tests received additional care coordination including physical and occupational therapy evaluations, home care, and medical equipment. When workup was completed, a 6-question survey was administered to assess satisfaction with the program elements on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), with opportunity to provide additional comments. Results From November 2020 through May 2021, 258 surveys were collected. The average age of responders was 79 and 40% of responders identified as male. 46.1% of surveyed patients were discharged, 34% admitted, 18% placed in the observation unit, 1.6% were discharged directly to a subacute rehab facility,\",\"PeriodicalId\":73757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2694-4715.1048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2694-4715.1048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言老年人口的规模正在增加,根据美国人口普查数据估计,到2030年,老年人口预计将占美国人口的20%,老年急诊科就诊人数预计还会增加。1先前的研究表明,接受ED评估的老年人比年轻人更有可能延长住院时间、进行更多的诊断测试和更高的总体成本,但尽管他们消耗了更多的资源和员工时间,老年人仍然更有可能对他们的治疗结果感到不满,也不太可能觉得他们提出的投诉已经得到解决。2,42013年,美国急诊医师学会开始了老年急诊科的正式认证程序,3博蒙特皇家橡树急诊科在获得认证过程中成立了老年评估小组(GAT)。这项定性研究的主要目的是在老年评估小组评估后,评估老年患者对他们在急诊科接受的护理的体验和看法,并确定患者是否会建议继续该项目。方法使用识别风险老年人问卷对周一至周五上午9点至下午5点从社区到急诊室就诊的65岁及以上不住在疗养院的患者进行筛查。那些得分为2或更高的人接受了额外的测试,以进一步评估认知能力、跌倒风险和多药治疗的风险。在任何这些检测中呈阳性的患者都接受了额外的护理协调,包括物理和职业治疗评估、家庭护理和医疗设备。工作完成后,进行了一项6个问题的调查,以评估对项目要素的满意度,从1(非常不满意)到5(非常满意),并有机会提供更多意见。结果从2020年11月到2021年5月,共收集了258项调查。应答者的平均年龄为79岁,40%的应答者为男性。46.1%的受访患者出院,34%入院,18%被安置在观察室,1.6%直接出院到亚急性康复机构,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Experience After Geriatric Emergency Medicine Assessment
Introduction The geriatric population is increasing in size and is expected to represent 20% of the United States population by 2030 per US census data estimates, with an expectant increase in geriatric emergency department (ED) visits. 1 Prior research has demonstrated older adults evaluated in the ED are more likely to have an increased length of stay, more diagnostic tests, and higher overall costs than their younger counterparts, but despite consuming greater resources and staff time, older adults are still more likely to be dissatisfied with their treatment outcomes and less likely to feel that their presenting complaint has been resolved. 2,4 In 2013 the American Academy of Emergency Physicians began a formal accrediting process for Geriatric Emergency Departments, 3 and the Beaumont Royal Oak ED implemented a Geriatric Assessment Team (GAT) while in the process of obtaining this accreditation. The primary objective of this qualitative study was to assess the older patient’s experience and perception of the care they received in the emergency department after evaluation by the Geriatric Assessment Team and determine if patients would recommend the continuation of this program. Methods Patients aged 65 and older that do not live in a nursing home and presented to the ED from the community Monday through Friday between 9 AM to 5 PM were screened using the Identifying Seniors at Risk Questionnaire. Those who scored 2 or higher underwent additional testing to further assess cognition, fall risk, risk of polypharmacy. Patients who screened positive on any of these tests received additional care coordination including physical and occupational therapy evaluations, home care, and medical equipment. When workup was completed, a 6-question survey was administered to assess satisfaction with the program elements on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), with opportunity to provide additional comments. Results From November 2020 through May 2021, 258 surveys were collected. The average age of responders was 79 and 40% of responders identified as male. 46.1% of surveyed patients were discharged, 34% admitted, 18% placed in the observation unit, 1.6% were discharged directly to a subacute rehab facility,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信