{"title":"次联邦蓄意排斥与自由贸易:墨西哥的中央集权联邦制和薄弱的制度能力","authors":"M. López-Vallejo, Jorge A. Schiavon","doi":"10.7202/1090917ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the relationship between trade and sub-federal deliberative exclusions in the case of Mexico. Mexican centralized federalism explains the absence of sub-federal governments (SFGs) in the negotiations of free trade agreements, even if they are responsible for dealing with trade outcomes at the local level. This article argues that sub-federal deliberative exclusions are not only evident under the federal allocation of powers but also by their limited institutional capacities (restrictions in budgets and personnel, lack of professionalization, and absence of inter-institutional coordination). This is the case of NAFTA, the USMCA, and the Mexico-European Union Free Agreement in its original and recently renegotiated versions. Despite constraints by federalism and institutional limitations, SFGs engage in trade and investment promotion through inter-institutional agreements (IIAs) allowed by secondary legislation.","PeriodicalId":39264,"journal":{"name":"Quebec Journal of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sub-Federal Deliberative Exclusions and Free Trade: Mexico’s Centralized Federalism and Weak Institutional Capacities\",\"authors\":\"M. López-Vallejo, Jorge A. Schiavon\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1090917ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the relationship between trade and sub-federal deliberative exclusions in the case of Mexico. Mexican centralized federalism explains the absence of sub-federal governments (SFGs) in the negotiations of free trade agreements, even if they are responsible for dealing with trade outcomes at the local level. This article argues that sub-federal deliberative exclusions are not only evident under the federal allocation of powers but also by their limited institutional capacities (restrictions in budgets and personnel, lack of professionalization, and absence of inter-institutional coordination). This is the case of NAFTA, the USMCA, and the Mexico-European Union Free Agreement in its original and recently renegotiated versions. Despite constraints by federalism and institutional limitations, SFGs engage in trade and investment promotion through inter-institutional agreements (IIAs) allowed by secondary legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quebec Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quebec Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1090917ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quebec Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1090917ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文以墨西哥为例,探讨了贸易与次联邦协商排除之间的关系。墨西哥的中央联邦制解释了为什么在自由贸易协定谈判中没有次联邦政府(SFGs),即使它们负责处理地方层面的贸易结果。本文认为,次联邦审议排除不仅在联邦权力分配下明显存在,而且在其机构能力有限(预算和人员限制、缺乏专业化和缺乏机构间协调)的情况下也很明显。北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)、美墨加贸易协定(USMCA)和墨西哥-欧盟自由协定(Mexico-European Union Free Agreement)的原始版本以及最近重新谈判的版本都是如此。尽管受到联邦制和体制限制的制约,SFGs通过二级立法允许的机构间协议(IIAs)促进贸易和投资。
Sub-Federal Deliberative Exclusions and Free Trade: Mexico’s Centralized Federalism and Weak Institutional Capacities
This article explores the relationship between trade and sub-federal deliberative exclusions in the case of Mexico. Mexican centralized federalism explains the absence of sub-federal governments (SFGs) in the negotiations of free trade agreements, even if they are responsible for dealing with trade outcomes at the local level. This article argues that sub-federal deliberative exclusions are not only evident under the federal allocation of powers but also by their limited institutional capacities (restrictions in budgets and personnel, lack of professionalization, and absence of inter-institutional coordination). This is the case of NAFTA, the USMCA, and the Mexico-European Union Free Agreement in its original and recently renegotiated versions. Despite constraints by federalism and institutional limitations, SFGs engage in trade and investment promotion through inter-institutional agreements (IIAs) allowed by secondary legislation.