德语历时中相对语词的起伏

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Ann M. Moser
{"title":"德语历时中相对语词的起伏","authors":"Ann M. Moser","doi":"10.1075/jhl.22026.mos","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The aim and scope of this article is to take a closer look at the functions and semantics of the three relative\n particles da, so, and wo, and to show that they have developed differently over a period from\n 1350 to 1800, continuing up to our modern dialects and the standard language. We will focus on wo because it is\n the only relativizer which is attested both as locative relative and as general relative clause marker, and we will propose that\n wo has extended its functional domain from a locative relative to a general relative marker. We will\n furthermore discuss if there has been a grammaticalization path “relative locative > general relative clause marker” in German\n diachrony or not. Finally, we will suggest that standardization processes are responsible for the different degrees of functional\n extension of wo attested in the historical/modern varieties and the standard language.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ups and downs of relative particles in German diachrony\",\"authors\":\"Ann M. Moser\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhl.22026.mos\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The aim and scope of this article is to take a closer look at the functions and semantics of the three relative\\n particles da, so, and wo, and to show that they have developed differently over a period from\\n 1350 to 1800, continuing up to our modern dialects and the standard language. We will focus on wo because it is\\n the only relativizer which is attested both as locative relative and as general relative clause marker, and we will propose that\\n wo has extended its functional domain from a locative relative to a general relative marker. We will\\n furthermore discuss if there has been a grammaticalization path “relative locative > general relative clause marker” in German\\n diachrony or not. Finally, we will suggest that standardization processes are responsible for the different degrees of functional\\n extension of wo attested in the historical/modern varieties and the standard language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.22026.mos\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.22026.mos","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的和范围是仔细研究三个相对助词da、so和wo的功能和语义,并说明它们在1350年至1800年期间的不同发展,一直延续到我们的现代方言和标准语言。我们将重点关注wo,因为它是唯一一个既被证明是位置关系又被证明是一般关系从句标记的相对词,我们将提出wo已经将其功能范围从位置关系扩展到一般关系标记。我们将进一步讨论德语历时性中是否存在“相对位置b>一般关系分句标记”的语法化路径。最后,我们将提出标准化过程对历史/现代变体和标准语言的不同程度的功能扩展负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ups and downs of relative particles in German diachrony
The aim and scope of this article is to take a closer look at the functions and semantics of the three relative particles da, so, and wo, and to show that they have developed differently over a period from 1350 to 1800, continuing up to our modern dialects and the standard language. We will focus on wo because it is the only relativizer which is attested both as locative relative and as general relative clause marker, and we will propose that wo has extended its functional domain from a locative relative to a general relative marker. We will furthermore discuss if there has been a grammaticalization path “relative locative > general relative clause marker” in German diachrony or not. Finally, we will suggest that standardization processes are responsible for the different degrees of functional extension of wo attested in the historical/modern varieties and the standard language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Journal of Historical Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信