利用细菌回收混凝土废料最细组分的可能性:综述

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
V. Nežerka, P. Holeček, M. Somr, P. Tichá, M. Domonkos, H. Stiborová
{"title":"利用细菌回收混凝土废料最细组分的可能性:综述","authors":"V. Nežerka,&nbsp;P. Holeček,&nbsp;M. Somr,&nbsp;P. Tichá,&nbsp;M. Domonkos,&nbsp;H. Stiborová","doi":"10.1007/s11157-023-09654-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Introducing the principles of circular economy into the concrete industry would significantly contribute to the sustainability of this sector. Even though recycling ranks below waste elimination, the generation of concrete waste is inevitable, and modern recycling strategies cannot efficiently tackle waste concrete fines (WCF) that represent an enormous environmental burden. Inspired by recent advances in self-healing concretes and biocementation of loose soil, we propose harnessing bacteria for bonding WCF to form artificial rocks that could be used as construction material. The devised technology brings many obstacles that can be tackled based on extensive research offered in this critical review, focused mostly on different bacterial metabolic pathways resulting in calcite precipitation and their environmental impacts. The most frequently exploited pathway in materials engineering, ureolysis, was employed to demonstrate the technical feasibility of WCF recycling using <i>Sporosarcina pasteurii</i>. Despite promising results of this demonstration, an alternative approach must be sought to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with the use of ureolytic bacteria as it exceeds potential benefits. Such an approach could be based on the use of by-products from other industries to replace laboratory-grade chemicals, or on utilization of different metabolic pathways, such as carbonic anhydrase or methane oxidation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":754,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","volume":"22 2","pages":"427 - 450"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the possibility of using bacteria for recycling finest fractions of concrete waste: a critical review\",\"authors\":\"V. Nežerka,&nbsp;P. Holeček,&nbsp;M. Somr,&nbsp;P. Tichá,&nbsp;M. Domonkos,&nbsp;H. Stiborová\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11157-023-09654-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Introducing the principles of circular economy into the concrete industry would significantly contribute to the sustainability of this sector. Even though recycling ranks below waste elimination, the generation of concrete waste is inevitable, and modern recycling strategies cannot efficiently tackle waste concrete fines (WCF) that represent an enormous environmental burden. Inspired by recent advances in self-healing concretes and biocementation of loose soil, we propose harnessing bacteria for bonding WCF to form artificial rocks that could be used as construction material. The devised technology brings many obstacles that can be tackled based on extensive research offered in this critical review, focused mostly on different bacterial metabolic pathways resulting in calcite precipitation and their environmental impacts. The most frequently exploited pathway in materials engineering, ureolysis, was employed to demonstrate the technical feasibility of WCF recycling using <i>Sporosarcina pasteurii</i>. Despite promising results of this demonstration, an alternative approach must be sought to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with the use of ureolytic bacteria as it exceeds potential benefits. Such an approach could be based on the use of by-products from other industries to replace laboratory-grade chemicals, or on utilization of different metabolic pathways, such as carbonic anhydrase or methane oxidation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"427 - 450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-023-09654-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-023-09654-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将循环经济的原则引入混凝土行业将大大有助于该行业的可持续性。尽管回收排在废物消除之后,但混凝土废物的产生是不可避免的,现代回收策略无法有效处理代表巨大环境负担的废弃混凝土细粒(WCF)。受自愈混凝土和松散土壤生物胶结的最新进展的启发,我们提出利用细菌结合WCF形成可用作建筑材料的人造岩石。该技术带来了许多障碍,这些障碍可以根据本文提供的广泛研究来解决,这些研究主要集中在导致方解石沉淀的不同细菌代谢途径及其对环境的影响。在材料工程中最常被利用的途径——尿解,被用来证明利用巴氏孢杆菌回收WCF的技术可行性。尽管这一演示结果令人鼓舞,但必须寻求一种替代方法来减少与使用溶尿细菌相关的负面环境影响,因为它超过了潜在的好处。这种方法可以基于使用其他工业的副产品来取代实验室级化学品,或利用不同的代谢途径,例如碳酸酐酶或甲烷氧化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

On the possibility of using bacteria for recycling finest fractions of concrete waste: a critical review

On the possibility of using bacteria for recycling finest fractions of concrete waste: a critical review

Introducing the principles of circular economy into the concrete industry would significantly contribute to the sustainability of this sector. Even though recycling ranks below waste elimination, the generation of concrete waste is inevitable, and modern recycling strategies cannot efficiently tackle waste concrete fines (WCF) that represent an enormous environmental burden. Inspired by recent advances in self-healing concretes and biocementation of loose soil, we propose harnessing bacteria for bonding WCF to form artificial rocks that could be used as construction material. The devised technology brings many obstacles that can be tackled based on extensive research offered in this critical review, focused mostly on different bacterial metabolic pathways resulting in calcite precipitation and their environmental impacts. The most frequently exploited pathway in materials engineering, ureolysis, was employed to demonstrate the technical feasibility of WCF recycling using Sporosarcina pasteurii. Despite promising results of this demonstration, an alternative approach must be sought to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with the use of ureolytic bacteria as it exceeds potential benefits. Such an approach could be based on the use of by-products from other industries to replace laboratory-grade chemicals, or on utilization of different metabolic pathways, such as carbonic anhydrase or methane oxidation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology is a publication that offers easily comprehensible, reliable, and well-rounded perspectives and evaluations in the realm of environmental science and (bio)technology. It disseminates the most recent progressions and timely compilations of groundbreaking scientific discoveries, technological advancements, practical applications, policy developments, and societal concerns encompassing all facets of environmental science and (bio)technology. Furthermore, it tackles broader aspects beyond the natural sciences, incorporating subjects such as education, funding, policy-making, intellectual property, and societal influence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信