长时间负重对膝关节内收幅度和速度的影响

G. J. Salverda
{"title":"长时间负重对膝关节内收幅度和速度的影响","authors":"G. J. Salverda","doi":"10.18122/td.1835.boisestate","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Adopting knee adduction biomechanics during prolonged load carriage, a common military occupational \n activity, may increase service members knee osteoarthritis (OA) risk. Although service members reportedly increase knee adduction \n motions and moments during prolonged load carriage, it is unknown if either body borne load or walk duration increases velocity \n of knee adduction biomechanics, and subsequent knee OA risk. Varus thrust and alignment are also related to greater knee OA risk, \n yet it is unknown whether varus thrust and/or alignment are related to magnitude and velocity of knee adduction biomechanics \n during prolonged load carriage. Purpose: To determine whether body borne load and walk duration impacted \n magnitude and velocity of knee adduction biomechanics, or whether increases in knee adduction biomechanics are related \n to knee varus thrust or alignment. Methods: Seventeen participants (11 male/6 female, 23.2 ± 2.9 yrs, \n 1.8 ± .09 m, 71.0 ± 12.1 kg) had knee adduction biomechanics quantified while walking 1.3 m/s for 60 minutes with three \n body borne loads (0 kg, 15 kg, and 30 kg). Specifically, peak, average and maximum velocity, as well as time to peak, \n for knee adduction angle and moment, and varus thrust (first 16% of stance) were calculated at minutes 0, 30, and 60 \n of the load carriage task. Static knee alignment was calculated as the frontal plane knee projection \n angle. Statistical Analysis: Participants were defined as varus thrust (VT, n=8) or control (CON, n=9). Then, \n each knee adduction measurement was submitted to a repeated measures ANCOVA to test the main effect and interaction \n between body borne load (0 kg, 15 kg, and 30 kg), time (minutes 0, 30, and 60), and \n group (VT and CON), with static alignment considered a covariate. Results: A significant 3-way \n interaction for maximum varus thrust velocity (p=0.014), revealed the VT group exhibited greater maximum velocity at \n minutes 0 through 60 (p ≤ 0.038) with the 0 kg load, and minutes 0 and 60 (p ≤ 0.043) with the 15 kg load. Significant \n load by group interactions for magnitude (p=0.008) and average velocity (p=0.013) of varus thrust, and maximum KAA \n velocity (p=0.041) revealed VT participants exhibited larger and faster varus thrust and knee adduction angle than \n the CON group with the 0 kg and 15 kg loads (p < 0.050). Additionally, both magnitude and maximum velocity of KAM \n increased with the addition of load (p=0.009 and p=0.004), and walk duration increased magnitude of varus thrust \n (p=0.044). Static alignment was not a significant covariate for any knee adduction measure \n (p > 0.05). Conclusion: During prolonged load carriage participants adopted larger, faster knee adduction \n biomechanics, potentially increasing risk of knee OA. The VT group exhibited greater knee OA risk, and larger, faster \n knee adduction motions when walking with the lighter (0 kg and 15 kg) loads; while CON adopted increases in knee \n adduction biomechanics related to knee OA with the heavy (30 kg) load.","PeriodicalId":72381,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prolonged Load Carriage Impacts Magnitude and Velocity of Knee Adduction Biomechanics\",\"authors\":\"G. J. Salverda\",\"doi\":\"10.18122/td.1835.boisestate\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Adopting knee adduction biomechanics during prolonged load carriage, a common military occupational \\n activity, may increase service members knee osteoarthritis (OA) risk. Although service members reportedly increase knee adduction \\n motions and moments during prolonged load carriage, it is unknown if either body borne load or walk duration increases velocity \\n of knee adduction biomechanics, and subsequent knee OA risk. Varus thrust and alignment are also related to greater knee OA risk, \\n yet it is unknown whether varus thrust and/or alignment are related to magnitude and velocity of knee adduction biomechanics \\n during prolonged load carriage. Purpose: To determine whether body borne load and walk duration impacted \\n magnitude and velocity of knee adduction biomechanics, or whether increases in knee adduction biomechanics are related \\n to knee varus thrust or alignment. Methods: Seventeen participants (11 male/6 female, 23.2 ± 2.9 yrs, \\n 1.8 ± .09 m, 71.0 ± 12.1 kg) had knee adduction biomechanics quantified while walking 1.3 m/s for 60 minutes with three \\n body borne loads (0 kg, 15 kg, and 30 kg). Specifically, peak, average and maximum velocity, as well as time to peak, \\n for knee adduction angle and moment, and varus thrust (first 16% of stance) were calculated at minutes 0, 30, and 60 \\n of the load carriage task. Static knee alignment was calculated as the frontal plane knee projection \\n angle. Statistical Analysis: Participants were defined as varus thrust (VT, n=8) or control (CON, n=9). Then, \\n each knee adduction measurement was submitted to a repeated measures ANCOVA to test the main effect and interaction \\n between body borne load (0 kg, 15 kg, and 30 kg), time (minutes 0, 30, and 60), and \\n group (VT and CON), with static alignment considered a covariate. Results: A significant 3-way \\n interaction for maximum varus thrust velocity (p=0.014), revealed the VT group exhibited greater maximum velocity at \\n minutes 0 through 60 (p ≤ 0.038) with the 0 kg load, and minutes 0 and 60 (p ≤ 0.043) with the 15 kg load. Significant \\n load by group interactions for magnitude (p=0.008) and average velocity (p=0.013) of varus thrust, and maximum KAA \\n velocity (p=0.041) revealed VT participants exhibited larger and faster varus thrust and knee adduction angle than \\n the CON group with the 0 kg and 15 kg loads (p < 0.050). Additionally, both magnitude and maximum velocity of KAM \\n increased with the addition of load (p=0.009 and p=0.004), and walk duration increased magnitude of varus thrust \\n (p=0.044). Static alignment was not a significant covariate for any knee adduction measure \\n (p > 0.05). Conclusion: During prolonged load carriage participants adopted larger, faster knee adduction \\n biomechanics, potentially increasing risk of knee OA. The VT group exhibited greater knee OA risk, and larger, faster \\n knee adduction motions when walking with the lighter (0 kg and 15 kg) loads; while CON adopted increases in knee \\n adduction biomechanics related to knee OA with the heavy (30 kg) load.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18122/td.1835.boisestate\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18122/td.1835.boisestate","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:在长期负重运输中采用膝关节内收生物力学是一种常见的军事职业活动,可能会增加服役人员膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)的风险。尽管据报道,服役人员在长时间负重过程中会增加膝盖内收运动和力矩,但尚不清楚身体承受的负荷或行走时间是否会增加膝盖内收生物力学的速度,以及随后的膝盖OA风险。内翻肌推力和对齐也与更大的膝关节骨性关节炎风险有关,但尚不清楚内翻肌推力或对齐是否与长时间负重过程中膝关节内收生物力学的大小和速度有关。目的:确定身体承受的负荷和行走时间是否影响膝内收生物力学的大小和速度,或者膝内收力学的增加是否与膝内翻推力或对齐有关。方法:17名参与者(11名男性/6名女性,23.2±2.9岁,1.8±.09米,71.0±12.1公斤)在3种身体负荷(0公斤、15公斤和30公斤)下以1.3米/秒的速度行走60分钟时,对膝关节内收生物力学进行了量化。具体而言,在负重任务的第0分钟、第30分钟和第60分钟计算膝盖内收角和力矩以及内翻推力(站姿的前16%)的峰值、平均速度和最大速度,以及达到峰值的时间。静态膝盖对齐计算为正面膝盖投影角度。统计分析:参与者被定义为内翻推力(VT,n=8)或对照组(CON,n=9)。然后,将每个膝盖内收测量值提交给重复测量ANCOVA,以测试身体负荷(0 kg、15 kg和30 kg)、时间(0、30和60分钟)和组(VT和CON)之间的主要影响和相互作用,静态对齐被视为协变量。结果:最大内翻推力速度的显著三向相互作用(p=0.014)表明,VT组在0 kg负荷下第0分钟至第60分钟(p≤0.038)表现出更大的最大速度,在15 kg负荷下在第0分钟和第60分钟表现出更高的最大速度(p≤0.043)。组间负荷对内翻推力大小(p=0.008)和平均速度(p=0.013)以及最大KAA速度(p=0.041)的显著交互作用表明,VT参与者表现出比0 kg和15 kg负荷的CON组更大、更快的内翻推力和膝盖内收角(p<0.050)。此外,KAM的大小和最大速度都随着负荷的增加而增加(p=0.009和p=0.004),行走时间增加了内翻推力的大小(p=0.044)。静态对齐不是任何膝关节内收测量的显著协变量(p>0.05),可能增加膝关节骨性关节炎的风险。VT组在较轻(0 kg和15 kg)负荷下行走时,表现出更大的膝关节OA风险,以及更大、更快的膝关节内收运动;而CON采用了与重(30kg)负荷的膝关节OA相关的膝关节内收生物力学的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prolonged Load Carriage Impacts Magnitude and Velocity of Knee Adduction Biomechanics
Introduction: Adopting knee adduction biomechanics during prolonged load carriage, a common military occupational activity, may increase service members knee osteoarthritis (OA) risk. Although service members reportedly increase knee adduction motions and moments during prolonged load carriage, it is unknown if either body borne load or walk duration increases velocity of knee adduction biomechanics, and subsequent knee OA risk. Varus thrust and alignment are also related to greater knee OA risk, yet it is unknown whether varus thrust and/or alignment are related to magnitude and velocity of knee adduction biomechanics during prolonged load carriage. Purpose: To determine whether body borne load and walk duration impacted magnitude and velocity of knee adduction biomechanics, or whether increases in knee adduction biomechanics are related to knee varus thrust or alignment. Methods: Seventeen participants (11 male/6 female, 23.2 ± 2.9 yrs, 1.8 ± .09 m, 71.0 ± 12.1 kg) had knee adduction biomechanics quantified while walking 1.3 m/s for 60 minutes with three body borne loads (0 kg, 15 kg, and 30 kg). Specifically, peak, average and maximum velocity, as well as time to peak, for knee adduction angle and moment, and varus thrust (first 16% of stance) were calculated at minutes 0, 30, and 60 of the load carriage task. Static knee alignment was calculated as the frontal plane knee projection angle. Statistical Analysis: Participants were defined as varus thrust (VT, n=8) or control (CON, n=9). Then, each knee adduction measurement was submitted to a repeated measures ANCOVA to test the main effect and interaction between body borne load (0 kg, 15 kg, and 30 kg), time (minutes 0, 30, and 60), and group (VT and CON), with static alignment considered a covariate. Results: A significant 3-way interaction for maximum varus thrust velocity (p=0.014), revealed the VT group exhibited greater maximum velocity at minutes 0 through 60 (p ≤ 0.038) with the 0 kg load, and minutes 0 and 60 (p ≤ 0.043) with the 15 kg load. Significant load by group interactions for magnitude (p=0.008) and average velocity (p=0.013) of varus thrust, and maximum KAA velocity (p=0.041) revealed VT participants exhibited larger and faster varus thrust and knee adduction angle than the CON group with the 0 kg and 15 kg loads (p < 0.050). Additionally, both magnitude and maximum velocity of KAM increased with the addition of load (p=0.009 and p=0.004), and walk duration increased magnitude of varus thrust (p=0.044). Static alignment was not a significant covariate for any knee adduction measure (p > 0.05). Conclusion: During prolonged load carriage participants adopted larger, faster knee adduction biomechanics, potentially increasing risk of knee OA. The VT group exhibited greater knee OA risk, and larger, faster knee adduction motions when walking with the lighter (0 kg and 15 kg) loads; while CON adopted increases in knee adduction biomechanics related to knee OA with the heavy (30 kg) load.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信