孟加拉国不同卫生服务层级COVID-19疾病管理的服务可得性和准备情况评估

Q4 Medicine
H. Rashid, Nazneed Akhter, A.H.M Rasheduzzaman, HM Miraz Mahmud, R. Banik, SM Sayadat Amin, Md Ruhul Amin
{"title":"孟加拉国不同卫生服务层级COVID-19疾病管理的服务可得性和准备情况评估","authors":"H. Rashid, Nazneed Akhter, A.H.M Rasheduzzaman, HM Miraz Mahmud, R. Banik, SM Sayadat Amin, Md Ruhul Amin","doi":"10.3329/bmrcb.v48i2.62303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The world is passing through a hard time due to the highly infectious COVID-19 pandemic. Like other countries in the world, the Bangladesh government has taken various preventive measures. As part of this, the availability and readiness of different health facilities is crucial.\nObjective: The study aimed to assess availability and readiness based on logistics, workforce, clinical management, and IPC. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted from August 20 to September 30, 2021, which comprised a health facility survey with a sample of 210. The health facilities included all three tiers of hospitals, covering 24 districts of eight divisions. All COVID-19 dedicated hospitals were included in this survey. The questionnaire consisted of a standard checklist developed by WHO, DGHS, and CDC.\nResults: The overall scores for ICU, HDU, and ventilation service were 76.8%, 87.5%, and 85.7%, respectively, but they were almost missing in Upazila health complex and below the average in non-dedicated hospitals. All (100%) secondary and tertiary level hospitals had a 24-hour staffed emergency unit, with dedicated hospitals outperforming non-dedicated hospitals (99.2% vs 98.7%). Above 90% of hospitals in different tiers had hand hygiene supplies and respiratory hygiene supplies for staff and patients, 98% of the primary level hospitals displayed instructions on hand and respiratory hygiene practices. On the other hand, 94.9% of secondary level hospitals had clearly identified and separated COVID-19 isolation areas from non-COVID-19 areas; 82.1% of secondary level hospitals had service providers (MOs) who used PPE; 97.4% had routine cleaning and disinfection of ambulances done according to IPC guidelines; and 64.1% had staff of laboratory, laundry, food services, and waste management teams who used appropriate PPE. Secondary level hospitals had a better availability of PPE compared to primary and tertiary level hospitals, which consisted of protective gowns (87.8%), disposable latex gloves (examination) (92.5%), goggles, protective (82.9%), face shields (72.5%), respirator masks (N95 or FFP2) (75.0%), and masks, medical/surgical (97.6%) available for all health service providers. Almost 26.2% facility have PCR testing lab and almost all (96.7%) the facilities have specimen collection system in their facility.\nConclusion: The service availability and readiness regarding COVID-19 among different tiers of health facilities in Bangladesh are not adequate. We need more support for disease detection capacities through provision of technical expertise, laboratory equipment and increase capacity of the secondary and primary health care tier along with national capacity for covid-19 testing.\nBangladesh Medical Res Counc Bull 2022; 48: 160-171       ","PeriodicalId":8704,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service availability and readiness assessment of COVID-19 disease management at different tiers of health service delivery in Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"H. Rashid, Nazneed Akhter, A.H.M Rasheduzzaman, HM Miraz Mahmud, R. Banik, SM Sayadat Amin, Md Ruhul Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bmrcb.v48i2.62303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The world is passing through a hard time due to the highly infectious COVID-19 pandemic. Like other countries in the world, the Bangladesh government has taken various preventive measures. As part of this, the availability and readiness of different health facilities is crucial.\\nObjective: The study aimed to assess availability and readiness based on logistics, workforce, clinical management, and IPC. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted from August 20 to September 30, 2021, which comprised a health facility survey with a sample of 210. The health facilities included all three tiers of hospitals, covering 24 districts of eight divisions. All COVID-19 dedicated hospitals were included in this survey. The questionnaire consisted of a standard checklist developed by WHO, DGHS, and CDC.\\nResults: The overall scores for ICU, HDU, and ventilation service were 76.8%, 87.5%, and 85.7%, respectively, but they were almost missing in Upazila health complex and below the average in non-dedicated hospitals. All (100%) secondary and tertiary level hospitals had a 24-hour staffed emergency unit, with dedicated hospitals outperforming non-dedicated hospitals (99.2% vs 98.7%). Above 90% of hospitals in different tiers had hand hygiene supplies and respiratory hygiene supplies for staff and patients, 98% of the primary level hospitals displayed instructions on hand and respiratory hygiene practices. On the other hand, 94.9% of secondary level hospitals had clearly identified and separated COVID-19 isolation areas from non-COVID-19 areas; 82.1% of secondary level hospitals had service providers (MOs) who used PPE; 97.4% had routine cleaning and disinfection of ambulances done according to IPC guidelines; and 64.1% had staff of laboratory, laundry, food services, and waste management teams who used appropriate PPE. Secondary level hospitals had a better availability of PPE compared to primary and tertiary level hospitals, which consisted of protective gowns (87.8%), disposable latex gloves (examination) (92.5%), goggles, protective (82.9%), face shields (72.5%), respirator masks (N95 or FFP2) (75.0%), and masks, medical/surgical (97.6%) available for all health service providers. Almost 26.2% facility have PCR testing lab and almost all (96.7%) the facilities have specimen collection system in their facility.\\nConclusion: The service availability and readiness regarding COVID-19 among different tiers of health facilities in Bangladesh are not adequate. We need more support for disease detection capacities through provision of technical expertise, laboratory equipment and increase capacity of the secondary and primary health care tier along with national capacity for covid-19 testing.\\nBangladesh Medical Res Counc Bull 2022; 48: 160-171       \",\"PeriodicalId\":8704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v48i2.62303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v48i2.62303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于传染性很强的COVID-19大流行,世界正在经历一段艰难时期。与世界上其他国家一样,孟加拉国政府采取了各种预防措施。作为其中的一部分,各种卫生设施的可用性和准备程度至关重要。目的:本研究旨在评估基于物流、劳动力、临床管理和IPC的可用性和准备情况。方法:于2021年8月20日至9月30日进行横断面定量研究,包括对210个样本的卫生机构进行调查。保健设施包括所有三级医院,覆盖24个县的8个区。本次调查包括所有COVID-19专科医院。问卷由世卫组织、dhs和CDC制定的标准清单组成。结果:ICU、HDU和通气服务的总得分分别为76.8%、87.5%和85.7%,但Upazila卫生综合医院几乎缺失,非专科医院低于平均水平。所有(100%)二级和三级医院都有24小时配备急救人员的科室,专科医院优于非专科医院(99.2%对98.7%)。90%以上的各级医院为医护人员和患者配备了手卫生用品和呼吸卫生用品,98%的基层医院有手卫生和呼吸卫生指导。另一方面,94.9%的二级医院明确划分了新冠肺炎隔离区和非新冠肺炎隔离区;82.1%的二级医院存在使用个人防护装备的服务提供者;97.4%的救护车按照感染预防和控制准则进行了例行清洁和消毒;64.1%的实验室、洗衣、食品服务和废物管理团队的工作人员使用了适当的个人防护装备。与一级和三级医院相比,二级医院拥有更好的个人防护装备,包括防护服(87.8%)、一次性乳胶手套(检查)(92.5%)、护目镜、防护服(82.9%)、面罩(72.5%)、呼吸器口罩(N95或FFP2)(75.0%)以及所有卫生服务提供者可获得的医用/外科口罩(97.6%)。几乎26.2%的设施有PCR检测实验室,几乎所有(96.7%)的设施都有标本采集系统。结论:孟加拉国各级卫生机构对COVID-19的服务可得性和准备程度不足。我们需要通过提供技术专长、实验室设备、提高二级和初级卫生保健层的能力以及国家covid-19检测能力,为疾病检测能力提供更多支持。孟加拉国医疗援助理事会2022年公报;48: 160 - 171
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Service availability and readiness assessment of COVID-19 disease management at different tiers of health service delivery in Bangladesh
Background: The world is passing through a hard time due to the highly infectious COVID-19 pandemic. Like other countries in the world, the Bangladesh government has taken various preventive measures. As part of this, the availability and readiness of different health facilities is crucial. Objective: The study aimed to assess availability and readiness based on logistics, workforce, clinical management, and IPC. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted from August 20 to September 30, 2021, which comprised a health facility survey with a sample of 210. The health facilities included all three tiers of hospitals, covering 24 districts of eight divisions. All COVID-19 dedicated hospitals were included in this survey. The questionnaire consisted of a standard checklist developed by WHO, DGHS, and CDC. Results: The overall scores for ICU, HDU, and ventilation service were 76.8%, 87.5%, and 85.7%, respectively, but they were almost missing in Upazila health complex and below the average in non-dedicated hospitals. All (100%) secondary and tertiary level hospitals had a 24-hour staffed emergency unit, with dedicated hospitals outperforming non-dedicated hospitals (99.2% vs 98.7%). Above 90% of hospitals in different tiers had hand hygiene supplies and respiratory hygiene supplies for staff and patients, 98% of the primary level hospitals displayed instructions on hand and respiratory hygiene practices. On the other hand, 94.9% of secondary level hospitals had clearly identified and separated COVID-19 isolation areas from non-COVID-19 areas; 82.1% of secondary level hospitals had service providers (MOs) who used PPE; 97.4% had routine cleaning and disinfection of ambulances done according to IPC guidelines; and 64.1% had staff of laboratory, laundry, food services, and waste management teams who used appropriate PPE. Secondary level hospitals had a better availability of PPE compared to primary and tertiary level hospitals, which consisted of protective gowns (87.8%), disposable latex gloves (examination) (92.5%), goggles, protective (82.9%), face shields (72.5%), respirator masks (N95 or FFP2) (75.0%), and masks, medical/surgical (97.6%) available for all health service providers. Almost 26.2% facility have PCR testing lab and almost all (96.7%) the facilities have specimen collection system in their facility. Conclusion: The service availability and readiness regarding COVID-19 among different tiers of health facilities in Bangladesh are not adequate. We need more support for disease detection capacities through provision of technical expertise, laboratory equipment and increase capacity of the secondary and primary health care tier along with national capacity for covid-19 testing. Bangladesh Medical Res Counc Bull 2022; 48: 160-171       
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The official publication of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信