学习方法的准确性Takhrījīth有意图和创造人类之间的比较:研究不足'Jam Al-Mufahras Li (Alf thādh Al -Ḥadī,Al-Maktabah Al-Shā米拉和下巴āmi’Al-Kalim

Kasman Kasman
{"title":"学习方法的准确性Takhrījīth有意图和创造人类之间的比较:研究不足'Jam Al-Mufahras Li (Alf thādh Al -Ḥadī,Al-Maktabah Al-Shā米拉和下巴āmi’Al-Kalim","authors":"Kasman Kasman","doi":"10.35719/islamikainside.v8i2.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Takhrīj as a search for al-Ḥadīth to its original sources is the first step that must be done. There are many tools that can be used to perform takhrīj al-Ḥadīth. This paper attempts to compare the accuracy of three tools of takhrīj al-Ḥadīth that are widely used today, namely Kitab al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfādh al-Hadts, Software al-Maktabah al-Shāmilah and Software Jawāmi‘ al-Kalim. By conducting a comparative analysis that is practiced on the takhrīj al-Ḥadīths of intention and the al-Ḥadīths of human creation, the result is that the al-Maktabah al-Shāmilah software has the highest accuracy with a 100% level both in the al-Ḥadīth of intention and of human creation, then the book al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfādh al-Al-Ḥadīth with 100% accuracy rate for intention al-Ḥadīth and 81.82% for human creation al-Ḥadīth, and the lowest is Jawāmi‘ al-Kalim software which only reaches 50% accuracy rate for intention al-Ḥadīth and 37.5% for human creation al-Ḥadīth.","PeriodicalId":33042,"journal":{"name":"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telaah Akurasi Metode Takhrīj Hadīth Niat dan Penciptaan Manusia: Studi Komparasi Antara Al-Mu‘Jam Al-Mufahras Li Alfādh Al-Ḥadīth, Al-Maktabah Al-Shāmilah dan Jawāmi’ Al-Kalim\",\"authors\":\"Kasman Kasman\",\"doi\":\"10.35719/islamikainside.v8i2.183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Takhrīj as a search for al-Ḥadīth to its original sources is the first step that must be done. There are many tools that can be used to perform takhrīj al-Ḥadīth. This paper attempts to compare the accuracy of three tools of takhrīj al-Ḥadīth that are widely used today, namely Kitab al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfādh al-Hadts, Software al-Maktabah al-Shāmilah and Software Jawāmi‘ al-Kalim. By conducting a comparative analysis that is practiced on the takhrīj al-Ḥadīths of intention and the al-Ḥadīths of human creation, the result is that the al-Maktabah al-Shāmilah software has the highest accuracy with a 100% level both in the al-Ḥadīth of intention and of human creation, then the book al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfādh al-Al-Ḥadīth with 100% accuracy rate for intention al-Ḥadīth and 81.82% for human creation al-Ḥadīth, and the lowest is Jawāmi‘ al-Kalim software which only reaches 50% accuracy rate for intention al-Ḥadīth and 37.5% for human creation al-Ḥadīth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35719/islamikainside.v8i2.183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35719/islamikainside.v8i2.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

takhrj作为搜索al-Ḥadīth到其原始来源是必须做的第一步。有许多工具可用于执行takhrj al-Ḥadīth。本文试图比较目前广泛使用的三种takhrj al-Ḥadīth工具,即Kitab al- mu ' jam al- mufahras li Alfādh al- hats、Software al- maktabah al-Shāmilah和Software Jawāmi ' al- kalim的准确性。通过对意图的takhrj al-Ḥadīths和人类创造的al-Ḥadīths进行对比分析,结果是al- maktabah al-Shāmilah软件在意图和人类创造的al-Ḥadīth中准确率最高,达到100%,其次是al- mu 'jam al- mufahras li Alfādh al- al-Ḥadīth,意图的准确率为100% -Ḥadīth,人类创造的准确率为81.82% -Ḥadīth。最低的是Jawāmi ' al- kalim软件,对意图人工智能的准确率只有50% -Ḥadīth,对人类创造人工智能的准确率只有37.5% -Ḥadīth。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telaah Akurasi Metode Takhrīj Hadīth Niat dan Penciptaan Manusia: Studi Komparasi Antara Al-Mu‘Jam Al-Mufahras Li Alfādh Al-Ḥadīth, Al-Maktabah Al-Shāmilah dan Jawāmi’ Al-Kalim
Takhrīj as a search for al-Ḥadīth to its original sources is the first step that must be done. There are many tools that can be used to perform takhrīj al-Ḥadīth. This paper attempts to compare the accuracy of three tools of takhrīj al-Ḥadīth that are widely used today, namely Kitab al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfādh al-Hadts, Software al-Maktabah al-Shāmilah and Software Jawāmi‘ al-Kalim. By conducting a comparative analysis that is practiced on the takhrīj al-Ḥadīths of intention and the al-Ḥadīths of human creation, the result is that the al-Maktabah al-Shāmilah software has the highest accuracy with a 100% level both in the al-Ḥadīth of intention and of human creation, then the book al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfādh al-Al-Ḥadīth with 100% accuracy rate for intention al-Ḥadīth and 81.82% for human creation al-Ḥadīth, and the lowest is Jawāmi‘ al-Kalim software which only reaches 50% accuracy rate for intention al-Ḥadīth and 37.5% for human creation al-Ḥadīth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信