谈原住民社区:儿童保护从业者的观点

IF 0.1 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Christopher Walmsley
{"title":"谈原住民社区:儿童保护从业者的观点","authors":"Christopher Walmsley","doi":"10.7202/1069585AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Child protection practitioners view Aboriginal communities as victim, adversary, participant, partner, and protector of children. These representations ofcommunities are derived from interview data with 19 Aboriginal and nonAboriginal child protection social workers in British Columbia, Canada. The representations of the community are informed by the practitioner’s geographic relationship to the community and the length of community residency (including whether it’s the practitioner’s community of origin). Practitioners view communities as a victim or adversary when no relationship of trust exists with the community. Practitioners view communities having a participative or partnership role in child protection when trust has developed. When communities take full responsibility for children’s welfare, practitioners view the community as the protector of children. No clear association was found between the different representations of the community and the practitioner’s culture or organizational auspices. The practitioner’s own vision of practice is believed to significantly influence the relationship that develops with the community.","PeriodicalId":44259,"journal":{"name":"First Peoples Child & Family Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talking about the Aboriginal Community: Child Protection Practitioners’ Views\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Walmsley\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1069585AR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Child protection practitioners view Aboriginal communities as victim, adversary, participant, partner, and protector of children. These representations ofcommunities are derived from interview data with 19 Aboriginal and nonAboriginal child protection social workers in British Columbia, Canada. The representations of the community are informed by the practitioner’s geographic relationship to the community and the length of community residency (including whether it’s the practitioner’s community of origin). Practitioners view communities as a victim or adversary when no relationship of trust exists with the community. Practitioners view communities having a participative or partnership role in child protection when trust has developed. When communities take full responsibility for children’s welfare, practitioners view the community as the protector of children. No clear association was found between the different representations of the community and the practitioner’s culture or organizational auspices. The practitioner’s own vision of practice is believed to significantly influence the relationship that develops with the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Peoples Child & Family Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Peoples Child & Family Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1069585AR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Peoples Child & Family Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1069585AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

儿童保护从业者将土著社区视为儿童的受害者、对手、参与者、合作伙伴和保护者。这些社区代表来自对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省19名土著和非土著儿童保护社会工作者的访谈数据。社区的代表是由从业者与社区的地理关系和社区居住的时间长短(包括从业者的原籍社区)决定的。当与社区之间不存在信任关系时,从业者将社区视为受害者或对手。从业人员认为,在建立起信任后,社区在儿童保护方面具有参与性或伙伴性作用。当社区承担起儿童福利的全部责任时,从业者将社区视为儿童的保护者。在社区的不同代表与从业者的文化或组织赞助之间没有发现明确的联系。从业者自己的实践愿景被认为对与社区发展的关系有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Talking about the Aboriginal Community: Child Protection Practitioners’ Views
Child protection practitioners view Aboriginal communities as victim, adversary, participant, partner, and protector of children. These representations ofcommunities are derived from interview data with 19 Aboriginal and nonAboriginal child protection social workers in British Columbia, Canada. The representations of the community are informed by the practitioner’s geographic relationship to the community and the length of community residency (including whether it’s the practitioner’s community of origin). Practitioners view communities as a victim or adversary when no relationship of trust exists with the community. Practitioners view communities having a participative or partnership role in child protection when trust has developed. When communities take full responsibility for children’s welfare, practitioners view the community as the protector of children. No clear association was found between the different representations of the community and the practitioner’s culture or organizational auspices. The practitioner’s own vision of practice is believed to significantly influence the relationship that develops with the community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信