复杂桡骨远端骨折的桥钢板牵引:队列研究和文献系统回顾

Pub Date : 2023-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1770791
George P Esworthy, Vibha Shaji, Liron Duraku, Feiran Wu, Dominic M Power
{"title":"复杂桡骨远端骨折的桥钢板牵引:队列研究和文献系统回顾","authors":"George P Esworthy, Vibha Shaji, Liron Duraku, Feiran Wu, Dominic M Power","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1770791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Dorsal bridge plating (DP) of the distal radius is used as a definitive method of stabilization in complex fracture configurations and polytrauma patients. <b>Questions/Purposes</b>  This review aims to summarize the current understanding of DP and evaluate surgical outcomes. <b>Methods</b>  Four databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. Papers presenting outcome or complication data for DP were included. These were reviewed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment and Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies tools. Results were collated and compared to a local cohort of DP patients. <b>Results</b>  Literature review identified 416 patients with a pooled complication rate of 17% requiring additional intervention. The most prevalent complications were infection/wound healing issues, arthrosis, and hardware failure. Average range of motion was flexion 46.5 degrees, extension 50.7 degrees, ulnar deviation 21.4 degrees, radial deviation 17.3 degrees, pronation 75.8 degrees, and supination 72.9 degrees. On average, DP removal occurred at 3.8 months. Quality assessment showed varied results. There were 19 cases in our local cohort. Ten displayed similar results to the systematic review in terms of range of motion and radiographic parameters. Higher QuickDASH scores and complication rates were noted. Local DP showed earlier plate removal at 2.9 months compared to previous studies. <b>Conclusion</b>  DP is a valid and useful technique for treating complex distal radius fractures. It displays a lower risk of infection and pain compared to external fixation which is commonly used to treat similar injuries. Patients can recover well following treatment both in function and range of motion. Further high-quality studies are required to fully evaluate the technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridge Plate Distraction for Complex Distal Radius Fractures: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"George P Esworthy, Vibha Shaji, Liron Duraku, Feiran Wu, Dominic M Power\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1770791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Dorsal bridge plating (DP) of the distal radius is used as a definitive method of stabilization in complex fracture configurations and polytrauma patients. <b>Questions/Purposes</b>  This review aims to summarize the current understanding of DP and evaluate surgical outcomes. <b>Methods</b>  Four databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. Papers presenting outcome or complication data for DP were included. These were reviewed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment and Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies tools. Results were collated and compared to a local cohort of DP patients. <b>Results</b>  Literature review identified 416 patients with a pooled complication rate of 17% requiring additional intervention. The most prevalent complications were infection/wound healing issues, arthrosis, and hardware failure. Average range of motion was flexion 46.5 degrees, extension 50.7 degrees, ulnar deviation 21.4 degrees, radial deviation 17.3 degrees, pronation 75.8 degrees, and supination 72.9 degrees. On average, DP removal occurred at 3.8 months. Quality assessment showed varied results. There were 19 cases in our local cohort. Ten displayed similar results to the systematic review in terms of range of motion and radiographic parameters. Higher QuickDASH scores and complication rates were noted. Local DP showed earlier plate removal at 2.9 months compared to previous studies. <b>Conclusion</b>  DP is a valid and useful technique for treating complex distal radius fractures. It displays a lower risk of infection and pain compared to external fixation which is commonly used to treat similar injuries. Patients can recover well following treatment both in function and range of motion. Further high-quality studies are required to fully evaluate the technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1770791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1770791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景桡骨远端背桥钢板(DP)是一种稳定复杂骨折形态和多发创伤患者的常用方法。问题/目的本综述旨在总结目前对DP的认识并评估手术结果。方法按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目检索4个数据库,并在PROSPERO注册。报告DP的结果或并发症资料的论文被纳入。使用美国国立卫生研究院质量评估和非随机研究方法指数工具对这些进行了审查。对结果进行整理,并与当地DP患者队列进行比较。结果文献回顾确定416例患者,总并发症率为17%,需要额外干预。最常见的并发症是感染/伤口愈合问题,关节和硬件故障。平均活动范围为屈曲46.5度,伸展50.7度,尺侧偏差21.4度,桡骨偏差17.3度,旋前75.8度,旋后72.9度。DP的平均移除时间为3.8个月。质量评价结果各不相同。在我们当地的队列中有19例。10例在活动范围和x线摄影参数方面显示了与系统评价相似的结果。较高的QuickDASH评分和并发症发生率。与先前的研究相比,局部DP在2.9个月时显示更早的钢板移除。结论DP是治疗复杂桡骨远端骨折的有效方法。与通常用于治疗类似损伤的外固定架相比,它显示出更低的感染和疼痛风险。治疗后患者在功能和活动范围方面均恢复良好。需要进一步的高质量研究来充分评价该技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Bridge Plate Distraction for Complex Distal Radius Fractures: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review of the Literature.

Background  Dorsal bridge plating (DP) of the distal radius is used as a definitive method of stabilization in complex fracture configurations and polytrauma patients. Questions/Purposes  This review aims to summarize the current understanding of DP and evaluate surgical outcomes. Methods  Four databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. Papers presenting outcome or complication data for DP were included. These were reviewed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment and Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies tools. Results were collated and compared to a local cohort of DP patients. Results  Literature review identified 416 patients with a pooled complication rate of 17% requiring additional intervention. The most prevalent complications were infection/wound healing issues, arthrosis, and hardware failure. Average range of motion was flexion 46.5 degrees, extension 50.7 degrees, ulnar deviation 21.4 degrees, radial deviation 17.3 degrees, pronation 75.8 degrees, and supination 72.9 degrees. On average, DP removal occurred at 3.8 months. Quality assessment showed varied results. There were 19 cases in our local cohort. Ten displayed similar results to the systematic review in terms of range of motion and radiographic parameters. Higher QuickDASH scores and complication rates were noted. Local DP showed earlier plate removal at 2.9 months compared to previous studies. Conclusion  DP is a valid and useful technique for treating complex distal radius fractures. It displays a lower risk of infection and pain compared to external fixation which is commonly used to treat similar injuries. Patients can recover well following treatment both in function and range of motion. Further high-quality studies are required to fully evaluate the technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信