埃塞俄比亚的联邦制与少数民族

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Getaye Mulugeta Kasse
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚的联邦制与少数民族","authors":"Getaye Mulugeta Kasse","doi":"10.1163/15718115-bja10073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Though the normative and empirical theory of designing a Territorial Autonomy to give a response to the demand of ethno-cultural groups is dominant, equivocally, it is problematic in addressing the needs of dispersed minorities. To this end, the Nonterritorial Autonomy political theory has acquired a significant level of attention in the last two decades as a promising response for intra-unit minorities, and the model can coexist with Territorial Autonomy. By examining the current Territorial Autonomy in the form of Ethnic federalism in Ethiopia, this article highlighted the conventional understanding of autonomy and territoriality for not being suitable for dispersed minorities inhabited in the regional states. Thus, alternative arrangements that can complement Territorial autonomy must be examined. The article defends the Nonterritorial Autonomy model as a novel solution to the complications faced by dispersed minorities in Ethiopia; concomitantly, it is complementary to Territorial Autonomy.","PeriodicalId":44103,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnic Federalism and Minority in Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Getaye Mulugeta Kasse\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718115-bja10073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Though the normative and empirical theory of designing a Territorial Autonomy to give a response to the demand of ethno-cultural groups is dominant, equivocally, it is problematic in addressing the needs of dispersed minorities. To this end, the Nonterritorial Autonomy political theory has acquired a significant level of attention in the last two decades as a promising response for intra-unit minorities, and the model can coexist with Territorial Autonomy. By examining the current Territorial Autonomy in the form of Ethnic federalism in Ethiopia, this article highlighted the conventional understanding of autonomy and territoriality for not being suitable for dispersed minorities inhabited in the regional states. Thus, alternative arrangements that can complement Territorial autonomy must be examined. The article defends the Nonterritorial Autonomy model as a novel solution to the complications faced by dispersed minorities in Ethiopia; concomitantly, it is complementary to Territorial Autonomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管设计领土自治以回应民族文化群体需求的规范和经验理论占主导地位,但模棱两可的是,它在满足分散的少数民族的需求方面存在问题。为此,在过去的二十年里,非领土自治政治理论作为对单位内少数民族的一种有希望的回应而受到了极大的关注,并且该模式可以与领土自治共存。通过考察埃塞俄比亚目前以民族联邦制形式存在的领土自治,本文强调了对自治和领土性的传统理解,因为这种理解不适合居住在该地区各州的分散少数民族。因此,必须审查能够补充领土自治的替代安排。文章为非领土自治模式辩护,认为这是解决埃塞俄比亚分散的少数民族所面临的复杂问题的一种新方法;同时,它也是对领土自治的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnic Federalism and Minority in Ethiopia
Though the normative and empirical theory of designing a Territorial Autonomy to give a response to the demand of ethno-cultural groups is dominant, equivocally, it is problematic in addressing the needs of dispersed minorities. To this end, the Nonterritorial Autonomy political theory has acquired a significant level of attention in the last two decades as a promising response for intra-unit minorities, and the model can coexist with Territorial Autonomy. By examining the current Territorial Autonomy in the form of Ethnic federalism in Ethiopia, this article highlighted the conventional understanding of autonomy and territoriality for not being suitable for dispersed minorities inhabited in the regional states. Thus, alternative arrangements that can complement Territorial autonomy must be examined. The article defends the Nonterritorial Autonomy model as a novel solution to the complications faced by dispersed minorities in Ethiopia; concomitantly, it is complementary to Territorial Autonomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信