{"title":"詹姆斯·鲍德温评论趋势,2015-16","authors":"J. M. James","doi":"10.7227/jbr.5.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin\n studies between the years 2015 and 2016, reflecting on important scholarly\n events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in\n criticism. While these years witnessed a continuing interest in the relationship\n of Baldwin’s work to other authors and art forms as well as his\n transnational literary imagination, noted in previous scholarly reviews, three\n newly emergent trends are notable: an increased attention to Baldwin in journals\n primarily devoted to the study of literatures in English, a new wave of\n multidisciplinary studies of Baldwin, and a burgeoning archival turn in Baldwin\n criticism.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in James Baldwin Criticism, 2015–16\",\"authors\":\"J. M. James\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/jbr.5.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin\\n studies between the years 2015 and 2016, reflecting on important scholarly\\n events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in\\n criticism. While these years witnessed a continuing interest in the relationship\\n of Baldwin’s work to other authors and art forms as well as his\\n transnational literary imagination, noted in previous scholarly reviews, three\\n newly emergent trends are notable: an increased attention to Baldwin in journals\\n primarily devoted to the study of literatures in English, a new wave of\\n multidisciplinary studies of Baldwin, and a burgeoning archival turn in Baldwin\\n criticism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"James Baldwin Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"James Baldwin Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin
studies between the years 2015 and 2016, reflecting on important scholarly
events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in
criticism. While these years witnessed a continuing interest in the relationship
of Baldwin’s work to other authors and art forms as well as his
transnational literary imagination, noted in previous scholarly reviews, three
newly emergent trends are notable: an increased attention to Baldwin in journals
primarily devoted to the study of literatures in English, a new wave of
multidisciplinary studies of Baldwin, and a burgeoning archival turn in Baldwin
criticism.