詹姆斯·鲍德温评论趋势,2015-16

Q1 Arts and Humanities
J. M. James
{"title":"詹姆斯·鲍德温评论趋势,2015-16","authors":"J. M. James","doi":"10.7227/jbr.5.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin\n studies between the years 2015 and 2016, reflecting on important scholarly\n events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in\n criticism. While these years witnessed a continuing interest in the relationship\n of Baldwin’s work to other authors and art forms as well as his\n transnational literary imagination, noted in previous scholarly reviews, three\n newly emergent trends are notable: an increased attention to Baldwin in journals\n primarily devoted to the study of literatures in English, a new wave of\n multidisciplinary studies of Baldwin, and a burgeoning archival turn in Baldwin\n criticism.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in James Baldwin Criticism, 2015–16\",\"authors\":\"J. M. James\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/jbr.5.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin\\n studies between the years 2015 and 2016, reflecting on important scholarly\\n events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in\\n criticism. While these years witnessed a continuing interest in the relationship\\n of Baldwin’s work to other authors and art forms as well as his\\n transnational literary imagination, noted in previous scholarly reviews, three\\n newly emergent trends are notable: an increased attention to Baldwin in journals\\n primarily devoted to the study of literatures in English, a new wave of\\n multidisciplinary studies of Baldwin, and a burgeoning archival turn in Baldwin\\n criticism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"James Baldwin Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"James Baldwin Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇综述文章描绘了2015年至2016年间詹姆斯·鲍德温研究的总体方向,反映了这一时期的重要学术事件和出版物,并确定了批评的显著趋势。这些年来,鲍德温的作品与其他作家、艺术形式以及他的跨国文学想象力之间的关系一直受到关注,在之前的学术评论中有提到,有三个新趋势值得注意:鲍德温在主要致力于英语文学研究的期刊上受到越来越多的关注,鲍德温的多学科研究的新浪潮,鲍德温批评的档案转向迅速发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in James Baldwin Criticism, 2015–16
This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin studies between the years 2015 and 2016, reflecting on important scholarly events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in criticism. While these years witnessed a continuing interest in the relationship of Baldwin’s work to other authors and art forms as well as his transnational literary imagination, noted in previous scholarly reviews, three newly emergent trends are notable: an increased attention to Baldwin in journals primarily devoted to the study of literatures in English, a new wave of multidisciplinary studies of Baldwin, and a burgeoning archival turn in Baldwin criticism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
James Baldwin Review
James Baldwin Review Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信