摘要民族主义

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 ART
American Art Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1086/719439
Saul Nelson
{"title":"摘要民族主义","authors":"Saul Nelson","doi":"10.1086/719439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay analyzes the nationalization of modernism in the United States through the art of Barnett Newman, Georges Mathieu, and Larry Rivers. Modernism became the official high culture of the United States—and, by extension, “the West”—during the 1950s and 1960s. Rivers and Mathieu sought to place modernist painting in touch with history painting and the national past, without sacrificing contemporaneity. The contradictions implied by this approach were part of the point. In the catalog to the exhibition 12 Americans (1956), Rivers is described in the introduction as a “reactionary,” while a few pages later he calls himself a “revolutionary.” Mathieu—a Don Quixote figure, a pseudo-aristocratic oddity, a self-anointed knight with one foot in the past and one in the future—lived such contradictions. Though often considered eccentric, these painters help us understand the development of postwar abstraction. Newman’s work in the 1950s reveals that he, too, was grappling with an attempt to place painting in touch with the national past.","PeriodicalId":43434,"journal":{"name":"American Art","volume":"36 1","pages":"60 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract Nationalisms\",\"authors\":\"Saul Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/719439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay analyzes the nationalization of modernism in the United States through the art of Barnett Newman, Georges Mathieu, and Larry Rivers. Modernism became the official high culture of the United States—and, by extension, “the West”—during the 1950s and 1960s. Rivers and Mathieu sought to place modernist painting in touch with history painting and the national past, without sacrificing contemporaneity. The contradictions implied by this approach were part of the point. In the catalog to the exhibition 12 Americans (1956), Rivers is described in the introduction as a “reactionary,” while a few pages later he calls himself a “revolutionary.” Mathieu—a Don Quixote figure, a pseudo-aristocratic oddity, a self-anointed knight with one foot in the past and one in the future—lived such contradictions. Though often considered eccentric, these painters help us understand the development of postwar abstraction. Newman’s work in the 1950s reveals that he, too, was grappling with an attempt to place painting in touch with the national past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Art\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"60 - 89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/719439\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过纽曼、马修和里弗斯的艺术来分析美国现代主义的民族化。在20世纪50年代和60年代,现代主义成为美国官方的高雅文化,并引申为“西方”的高雅文化。里弗斯和马修试图在不牺牲当代性的情况下,将现代主义绘画与历史绘画和国家过去联系起来。这种方法所隐含的矛盾是问题的一部分。在展览《12个美国人》(1956)的目录中,里弗斯在介绍中被描述为“反动派”,而几页后他称自己为“革命者”。马修——一个堂吉诃德式的人物,一个伪贵族怪人,一个自封的骑士,一只脚在过去,一只脚在未来——生活在这样的矛盾中。尽管这些画家经常被认为是古怪的,但他们帮助我们理解了战后抽象艺术的发展。纽曼在20世纪50年代的作品表明,他也在努力尝试将绘画与国家的过去联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract Nationalisms
This essay analyzes the nationalization of modernism in the United States through the art of Barnett Newman, Georges Mathieu, and Larry Rivers. Modernism became the official high culture of the United States—and, by extension, “the West”—during the 1950s and 1960s. Rivers and Mathieu sought to place modernist painting in touch with history painting and the national past, without sacrificing contemporaneity. The contradictions implied by this approach were part of the point. In the catalog to the exhibition 12 Americans (1956), Rivers is described in the introduction as a “reactionary,” while a few pages later he calls himself a “revolutionary.” Mathieu—a Don Quixote figure, a pseudo-aristocratic oddity, a self-anointed knight with one foot in the past and one in the future—lived such contradictions. Though often considered eccentric, these painters help us understand the development of postwar abstraction. Newman’s work in the 1950s reveals that he, too, was grappling with an attempt to place painting in touch with the national past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: American Art is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring all aspects of the nation"s visual heritage from colonial to contemporary times. Through a broad interdisciplinary approach, American Art provides an understanding not only of specific artists and art objects, but also of the cultural factors that have shaped American art over three centuries of national experience. The fine arts are the journal"s primary focus, but its scope encompasses all aspects of the nation"s visual culture, including popular culture, public art, film, electronic multimedia, and decorative arts and crafts. American Art embraces all methods of investigation to explore America·s rich and diverse artistic legacy, from traditional formalism to analyses of social context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信