真正的贷款问题:前进一步,后退两步?

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Reed D. Auerbach, Susan F. DiCicco, David I. Monteiro
{"title":"真正的贷款问题:前进一步,后退两步?","authors":"Reed D. Auerbach, Susan F. DiCicco, David I. Monteiro","doi":"10.3905/jsf.2021.1.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The true lender rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) briefly provided a uniform standard that could be applied to determine when a national bank is acting as a lender when it partners with other service providers. The rule was lauded for its objective standard that respected the form of legal documentation. The fintech marketplace lending platforms and banks that have been doing business for years under a bank partnership model viewed the rule as a welcome sign that the OCC did not support state efforts to recast the marketplace lending platforms as the true lender as a way to impose state law usury rules against national banks. Then Congress invalidated the rule under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) within six months of its effective date. Did the bank partnership model take one step forward and two steps back? In this article, we explore “true lender” issues, existing litigation and regulatory developments, and the implications following the invalidation of the rule.","PeriodicalId":51968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structured Finance","volume":"27 1","pages":"43 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"True Lender Issues: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?\",\"authors\":\"Reed D. Auerbach, Susan F. DiCicco, David I. Monteiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jsf.2021.1.126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The true lender rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) briefly provided a uniform standard that could be applied to determine when a national bank is acting as a lender when it partners with other service providers. The rule was lauded for its objective standard that respected the form of legal documentation. The fintech marketplace lending platforms and banks that have been doing business for years under a bank partnership model viewed the rule as a welcome sign that the OCC did not support state efforts to recast the marketplace lending platforms as the true lender as a way to impose state law usury rules against national banks. Then Congress invalidated the rule under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) within six months of its effective date. Did the bank partnership model take one step forward and two steps back? In this article, we explore “true lender” issues, existing litigation and regulatory developments, and the implications following the invalidation of the rule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structured Finance\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structured Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2021.1.126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structured Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2021.1.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国货币监理署(OCC)发布的真正贷款人规则简要地提供了一个统一的标准,可用于确定一家国家银行在与其他服务提供商合作时何时充当贷款人。该规则因其尊重法律文件形式的客观标准而受到称赞。多年来一直在银行合作模式下开展业务的金融科技市场借贷平台和银行认为,这一规定是一个可喜的迹象,表明OCC不支持州政府将市场借贷平台重塑为真正的贷款人的努力,不支持州政府对全国性银行实施州法律高利贷规则的做法。随后,国会根据《国会审查法案》(Congressional Review Act, CRA)在该规定生效后6个月内宣布其无效。银行合作模式是否前进了一步,后退了两步?在本文中,我们将探讨“真正的贷款人”问题、现有的诉讼和监管发展,以及该规则无效后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
True Lender Issues: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?
The true lender rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) briefly provided a uniform standard that could be applied to determine when a national bank is acting as a lender when it partners with other service providers. The rule was lauded for its objective standard that respected the form of legal documentation. The fintech marketplace lending platforms and banks that have been doing business for years under a bank partnership model viewed the rule as a welcome sign that the OCC did not support state efforts to recast the marketplace lending platforms as the true lender as a way to impose state law usury rules against national banks. Then Congress invalidated the rule under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) within six months of its effective date. Did the bank partnership model take one step forward and two steps back? In this article, we explore “true lender” issues, existing litigation and regulatory developments, and the implications following the invalidation of the rule.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structured Finance
Journal of Structured Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structured Finance (JSF) is the only international, peer-reviewed journal devoted to empirical analysis and practical guidance on structured finance instruments, techniques, and strategies. JSF covers a wide range of topics including credit derivatives and synthetic securitization, secondary trading in the CDO market, securitization in emerging markets, trends in major consumer loan categories, accounting, regulatory, and tax issues in the structured finance industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信