做好事,做好事,让别人看起来很好:重新定义19世纪的护理实践

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
Tanya Langtree
{"title":"做好事,做好事,让别人看起来很好:重新定义19世纪的护理实践","authors":"Tanya Langtree","doi":"10.1080/09699082.2022.2122325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The discourse that surrounds nineteenth-century nursing is dominated by Florence Nightingale’s work to transform nursing from being a disreputable job performed by uneducated drunkards to that of an acceptable vocation for single women. Much of the reverence for Nightingale as the founder of modern nursing are based on half-truths found within E.T. Cook’s (1913) biography, The Life of Florence Nightingale. This reverence includes the misconception that Nightingale’s Notes on Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not (1859) was the first nursing book of its kind. However, over twenty books about nursing praxis were published in Western countries between the mid-eighteenth and mid-nineteenth centuries. Several of these books were written by women to assist other women performing nursing work. This paper examines three of these books – The Good Nurse (1825), The Family Nurse (1837) and Advices Concerning the Sick (c. 1847) – and compares their guiding principles to those found in Notes on Nursing and other key works by Nightingale. The findings from this comparative analysis demonstrates that Nightingale’s writings about what nursing ought to be were not unique nor original. Instead, they were aligned with the prevailing ideology of the period – nurses were required to be good and do good to make others look good.","PeriodicalId":42325,"journal":{"name":"Womens Writing","volume":"29 1","pages":"583 - 599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Being good, doing good, making others look good: Reconceptualising nineteenth-century nursing practice\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Langtree\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09699082.2022.2122325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The discourse that surrounds nineteenth-century nursing is dominated by Florence Nightingale’s work to transform nursing from being a disreputable job performed by uneducated drunkards to that of an acceptable vocation for single women. Much of the reverence for Nightingale as the founder of modern nursing are based on half-truths found within E.T. Cook’s (1913) biography, The Life of Florence Nightingale. This reverence includes the misconception that Nightingale’s Notes on Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not (1859) was the first nursing book of its kind. However, over twenty books about nursing praxis were published in Western countries between the mid-eighteenth and mid-nineteenth centuries. Several of these books were written by women to assist other women performing nursing work. This paper examines three of these books – The Good Nurse (1825), The Family Nurse (1837) and Advices Concerning the Sick (c. 1847) – and compares their guiding principles to those found in Notes on Nursing and other key works by Nightingale. The findings from this comparative analysis demonstrates that Nightingale’s writings about what nursing ought to be were not unique nor original. Instead, they were aligned with the prevailing ideology of the period – nurses were required to be good and do good to make others look good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Writing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"583 - 599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699082.2022.2122325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699082.2022.2122325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要围绕19世纪护理的讨论主要集中在弗洛伦斯·南丁格尔的工作上,她将护理从一种由未受过教育的酒鬼从事的不体面的工作转变为单身女性可以接受的职业。作为现代护理的创始人,人们对南丁格尔的崇敬大多基于E.T.库克(1913)传记《弗洛伦斯·南丁格尔一生》中的半真半假。这种崇敬包括一种误解,即南丁格尔的《护理笔记:它是什么和它不是什么》(1859)是第一本此类护理书籍。然而,在十八世纪中期到十九世纪中期,西方国家出版了二十多本关于护理实践的书。其中几本书是妇女为帮助其他从事护理工作的妇女而写的。本文考察了其中三本书——《好护士》(1825年)、《家庭护士》(1837年)和《关于病人的建议》(1847年)——并将其指导原则与南丁格尔的《护理笔记》和其他重要著作中的指导原则进行了比较。这一比较分析的结果表明,南丁格尔关于护理应该是什么的著作既不是独特的,也不是独创的。相反,他们与那个时代的主流意识形态保持一致——护士必须做得好,做得好才能让别人看起来好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Being good, doing good, making others look good: Reconceptualising nineteenth-century nursing practice
ABSTRACT The discourse that surrounds nineteenth-century nursing is dominated by Florence Nightingale’s work to transform nursing from being a disreputable job performed by uneducated drunkards to that of an acceptable vocation for single women. Much of the reverence for Nightingale as the founder of modern nursing are based on half-truths found within E.T. Cook’s (1913) biography, The Life of Florence Nightingale. This reverence includes the misconception that Nightingale’s Notes on Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not (1859) was the first nursing book of its kind. However, over twenty books about nursing praxis were published in Western countries between the mid-eighteenth and mid-nineteenth centuries. Several of these books were written by women to assist other women performing nursing work. This paper examines three of these books – The Good Nurse (1825), The Family Nurse (1837) and Advices Concerning the Sick (c. 1847) – and compares their guiding principles to those found in Notes on Nursing and other key works by Nightingale. The findings from this comparative analysis demonstrates that Nightingale’s writings about what nursing ought to be were not unique nor original. Instead, they were aligned with the prevailing ideology of the period – nurses were required to be good and do good to make others look good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Womens Writing
Womens Writing LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书