《欧洲人权公约》和欧洲人权委员会在妊娠代孕领域的做法

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
{"title":"《欧洲人权公约》和欧洲人权委员会在妊娠代孕领域的做法","authors":"","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-6.2-n000203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The article focuses on the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding gestational surrogate motherhood and the development of the bioethics issue in this area. It was established that the notion of \"private life,\" regulated by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guarantees everyone the ability to demand the establishment of their identity, providing for the possibility of establishing family relationships. It is highlighted that, despite the legal ban on the implementation of surrogate motherhood technology, to confirm the child’s identity, there is a need for official recognition of this kind of family relationship as indicated by other relevant relationships. In particular, the peculiarities of establishing parent-child relationships in the case of individuals applying for gestational surrogacy to exercise their reproductive rights are disclosed. The problem of legal regulation unification in the technological application of gestational surrogate motherhood is considered. A conclusion set regards the need to create an international legislative and regulatory framework useful for national governments, particularly in gradually banning the use of surrogate motherhood technologies. Attention is placed on international efforts focused to create an international legislative and regulatory framework that will provide recommendations useful to national governments, particularly in the gradual prohibition of surrogacy. The authors believe that the corresponding international agreement will constitute a legal framework for ensuring individual rights, freedoms, and health, the limitation to gestational surrogate motherhood services, and the observance of a uniform policy in this area.\nMethods: The methodological framework of the study incorporated a range of philosophical, general, and legal methods. The worldview-dialectical method of cognition made it possible to investigate the problem's social content and legal form, then to conduct a systematic theoretical and legal analysis of the practice by applying the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. The diversity of legal certainty of the surrogate motherhood system’s legality in Europe, particularly in France, Italy, Iceland, Poland, and Norway, was investigated using the comparative method. With the help of a formal-legal approach, it analysed the content and peculiarities of applying the ECtHR practice. \nResults and Conclusions: We comprehensively considered the ECtHR legal positions on gestational surrogate motherhood and the bioethics development in this area. International efforts should be concentrated on establishing an international regulatory framework that will provide recommendations practical to national governments, particularly in the gradual prohibition of surrogacy.","PeriodicalId":40329,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European Convention on Human Rights and the Practice of the ECtHR in the Field of Gestational Surrogacy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33327/ajee-18-6.2-n000203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The article focuses on the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding gestational surrogate motherhood and the development of the bioethics issue in this area. It was established that the notion of \\\"private life,\\\" regulated by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guarantees everyone the ability to demand the establishment of their identity, providing for the possibility of establishing family relationships. It is highlighted that, despite the legal ban on the implementation of surrogate motherhood technology, to confirm the child’s identity, there is a need for official recognition of this kind of family relationship as indicated by other relevant relationships. In particular, the peculiarities of establishing parent-child relationships in the case of individuals applying for gestational surrogacy to exercise their reproductive rights are disclosed. The problem of legal regulation unification in the technological application of gestational surrogate motherhood is considered. A conclusion set regards the need to create an international legislative and regulatory framework useful for national governments, particularly in gradually banning the use of surrogate motherhood technologies. Attention is placed on international efforts focused to create an international legislative and regulatory framework that will provide recommendations useful to national governments, particularly in the gradual prohibition of surrogacy. The authors believe that the corresponding international agreement will constitute a legal framework for ensuring individual rights, freedoms, and health, the limitation to gestational surrogate motherhood services, and the observance of a uniform policy in this area.\\nMethods: The methodological framework of the study incorporated a range of philosophical, general, and legal methods. The worldview-dialectical method of cognition made it possible to investigate the problem's social content and legal form, then to conduct a systematic theoretical and legal analysis of the practice by applying the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. The diversity of legal certainty of the surrogate motherhood system’s legality in Europe, particularly in France, Italy, Iceland, Poland, and Norway, was investigated using the comparative method. With the help of a formal-legal approach, it analysed the content and peculiarities of applying the ECtHR practice. \\nResults and Conclusions: We comprehensively considered the ECtHR legal positions on gestational surrogate motherhood and the bioethics development in this area. International efforts should be concentrated on establishing an international regulatory framework that will provide recommendations practical to national governments, particularly in the gradual prohibition of surrogacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6.2-n000203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6.2-n000203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。文章着重分析了欧洲人权法院关于代孕母亲的判例法以及这一领域生物伦理问题的发展。已经确定,《欧洲人权公约》第8条规定的“私人生活”概念保证每个人都有能力要求确立其身份,从而提供建立家庭关系的可能性。值得强调的是,尽管法律禁止实施代孕技术,但为了确认孩子的身份,需要官方承认这种由其他相关关系所表明的家庭关系。特别是,披露了申请代孕以行使其生殖权利的个人建立亲子关系的特点。对妊娠代母技术应用中的法律规制统一问题进行了探讨。一组结论认为需要建立一个对各国政府有用的国际立法和管理框架,特别是在逐步禁止使用代孕母亲技术方面。国际努力的重点是建立一个国际立法和管理框架,为各国政府提供有用的建议,特别是在逐步禁止代孕方面。提交人认为,相应的国际协定将构成一个法律框架,以确保个人权利、自由和健康,限制代孕母亲服务,并遵守这方面的统一政策。方法:研究的方法论框架包括一系列哲学、一般和法律方法。世界观-辩证法的认识方法,使我们能够考察问题的社会内容和法律形式,进而运用欧洲人权法院的判决,对实践进行系统的理论和法律分析。采用比较法对欧洲,特别是法国、意大利、冰岛、波兰和挪威等国代孕母亲制度合法性法律确定性的多样性进行了调查。本文借助正式法律方法,分析了适用《欧洲人权公约》实践的内容和特点。结果与结论:我们综合考虑了ECtHR关于代孕母亲的法律立场和该领域的生物伦理学发展。国际努力应集中于建立一个国际管理框架,为各国政府提供切实可行的建议,特别是在逐步禁止代孕方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The European Convention on Human Rights and the Practice of the ECtHR in the Field of Gestational Surrogacy
Background. The article focuses on the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding gestational surrogate motherhood and the development of the bioethics issue in this area. It was established that the notion of "private life," regulated by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guarantees everyone the ability to demand the establishment of their identity, providing for the possibility of establishing family relationships. It is highlighted that, despite the legal ban on the implementation of surrogate motherhood technology, to confirm the child’s identity, there is a need for official recognition of this kind of family relationship as indicated by other relevant relationships. In particular, the peculiarities of establishing parent-child relationships in the case of individuals applying for gestational surrogacy to exercise their reproductive rights are disclosed. The problem of legal regulation unification in the technological application of gestational surrogate motherhood is considered. A conclusion set regards the need to create an international legislative and regulatory framework useful for national governments, particularly in gradually banning the use of surrogate motherhood technologies. Attention is placed on international efforts focused to create an international legislative and regulatory framework that will provide recommendations useful to national governments, particularly in the gradual prohibition of surrogacy. The authors believe that the corresponding international agreement will constitute a legal framework for ensuring individual rights, freedoms, and health, the limitation to gestational surrogate motherhood services, and the observance of a uniform policy in this area. Methods: The methodological framework of the study incorporated a range of philosophical, general, and legal methods. The worldview-dialectical method of cognition made it possible to investigate the problem's social content and legal form, then to conduct a systematic theoretical and legal analysis of the practice by applying the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. The diversity of legal certainty of the surrogate motherhood system’s legality in Europe, particularly in France, Italy, Iceland, Poland, and Norway, was investigated using the comparative method. With the help of a formal-legal approach, it analysed the content and peculiarities of applying the ECtHR practice. Results and Conclusions: We comprehensively considered the ECtHR legal positions on gestational surrogate motherhood and the bioethics development in this area. International efforts should be concentrated on establishing an international regulatory framework that will provide recommendations practical to national governments, particularly in the gradual prohibition of surrogacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信