隐形眼镜佩戴者对孟买隐形眼镜推荐更换时间表的展望

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Mansi Mehta, Kalika L. Bandamwar, Ph.D. Scholar
{"title":"隐形眼镜佩戴者对孟买隐形眼镜推荐更换时间表的展望","authors":"Mansi Mehta, Kalika L. Bandamwar, Ph.D. Scholar","doi":"10.47750/pnr.2023.14.s01.194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-compliance is one of the major reasons of CL related complications. Various research studies have been done over the past three decades to find reasons for patient non-compliances. Use of CLs over the recommended replacement schedule has been one of the major reasons leading to CLs complications. It is evident that the CLs user are often unaware of their non-compliance towards lens care and maintenance regimen. Even after introduction of daily disposable lenses and one-step multipurpose solution non-compliance towards CLs use is still a major problem in CLs patients. The complications due to patient noncompliance can be sometimes irreversible. This research will help us understand CL user reasons of intentionally or unintentionally being non-compliant to recommended replacement frequency. \nMethod: All CL users willing to share their experience participated in this questionnaire based online survey which was designed with the help of focused group discussion. \nResults: Most of the CL wearer prefer buying pairs for at least 6 months at a time. Almost 80% of CL wearers do not replace their CL as per MRRF. 70% of those who participated wore CL for more than 10 hours per day. The male and female ratio is almost equal in the participants participated in the research. \nConclusion: Research done in the past suggest incomplete knowledge imparted to the wearer or CL forgetting the instructions given to them at dispensing. Research also suggest some CL wearer knowingly are non-compliant to MRRF. This study tries to find loopholes in a CL practice by finding reasons of non-compliance as per CL wearers prospective and probable suggestion from the user itself. An ECP is a paramedical person who has the right to prescribe them, whether according to MRRF or as per their knowledge of the patient’s ocular status. For e.g., an antibiotic medicine is supposed to be prescribed for 3 days or 5 days, once or twice is decided by the medical practitioner prescribing. As this research shows over 50% of the CL wearer said that their 'ECP said its okay'.","PeriodicalId":16728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact Lens Wearer’s Outlook Towards Recommended Replacement Schedule of Contact Lens in Mumbai\",\"authors\":\"Mansi Mehta, Kalika L. Bandamwar, Ph.D. Scholar\",\"doi\":\"10.47750/pnr.2023.14.s01.194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Non-compliance is one of the major reasons of CL related complications. Various research studies have been done over the past three decades to find reasons for patient non-compliances. Use of CLs over the recommended replacement schedule has been one of the major reasons leading to CLs complications. It is evident that the CLs user are often unaware of their non-compliance towards lens care and maintenance regimen. Even after introduction of daily disposable lenses and one-step multipurpose solution non-compliance towards CLs use is still a major problem in CLs patients. The complications due to patient noncompliance can be sometimes irreversible. This research will help us understand CL user reasons of intentionally or unintentionally being non-compliant to recommended replacement frequency. \\nMethod: All CL users willing to share their experience participated in this questionnaire based online survey which was designed with the help of focused group discussion. \\nResults: Most of the CL wearer prefer buying pairs for at least 6 months at a time. Almost 80% of CL wearers do not replace their CL as per MRRF. 70% of those who participated wore CL for more than 10 hours per day. The male and female ratio is almost equal in the participants participated in the research. \\nConclusion: Research done in the past suggest incomplete knowledge imparted to the wearer or CL forgetting the instructions given to them at dispensing. Research also suggest some CL wearer knowingly are non-compliant to MRRF. This study tries to find loopholes in a CL practice by finding reasons of non-compliance as per CL wearers prospective and probable suggestion from the user itself. An ECP is a paramedical person who has the right to prescribe them, whether according to MRRF or as per their knowledge of the patient’s ocular status. For e.g., an antibiotic medicine is supposed to be prescribed for 3 days or 5 days, once or twice is decided by the medical practitioner prescribing. As this research shows over 50% of the CL wearer said that their 'ECP said its okay'.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.s01.194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.s01.194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不依从性是CL相关并发症的主要原因之一。在过去的三十年里,人们进行了各种研究来寻找患者不依从性的原因。CL的使用超过了推荐的更换时间表是导致CL并发症的主要原因之一。很明显,CL使用者往往不知道他们不遵守晶状体护理和维护方案。即使在引入日常一次性镜片和一步多用途解决方案后,不遵守CL的使用仍然是CL患者的一个主要问题。由于患者的不依从性导致的并发症有时是不可逆转的。这项研究将帮助我们了解CL用户有意或无意不遵守建议更换频率的原因。方法:所有愿意分享经验的CL用户都参与了这项基于问卷的在线调查,该调查是在小组讨论的帮助下设计的。结果:大多数CL佩戴者更喜欢一次购买至少6个月的双鞋。几乎80%的CL佩戴者没有按照MRRF更换CL。70%的参与者每天佩戴CL超过10小时。在参与研究的参与者中,男女比例几乎相等。结论:过去的研究表明,传授给佩戴者或CL的知识不完整,忘记了配药时给他们的指示。研究还表明,一些CL佩戴者故意不遵守MRRF。本研究试图根据CL佩戴者的预期和可能的用户建议,找出CL实践中的漏洞。ECP是指有权开具处方的辅助医疗人员,无论是根据MRRF还是根据他们对患者眼部状况的了解。例如,抗生素药物应该开3天或5天,一次或两次由医生决定。这项研究表明,超过50%的CL佩戴者表示他们的“ECP说没问题”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contact Lens Wearer’s Outlook Towards Recommended Replacement Schedule of Contact Lens in Mumbai
Background: Non-compliance is one of the major reasons of CL related complications. Various research studies have been done over the past three decades to find reasons for patient non-compliances. Use of CLs over the recommended replacement schedule has been one of the major reasons leading to CLs complications. It is evident that the CLs user are often unaware of their non-compliance towards lens care and maintenance regimen. Even after introduction of daily disposable lenses and one-step multipurpose solution non-compliance towards CLs use is still a major problem in CLs patients. The complications due to patient noncompliance can be sometimes irreversible. This research will help us understand CL user reasons of intentionally or unintentionally being non-compliant to recommended replacement frequency. Method: All CL users willing to share their experience participated in this questionnaire based online survey which was designed with the help of focused group discussion. Results: Most of the CL wearer prefer buying pairs for at least 6 months at a time. Almost 80% of CL wearers do not replace their CL as per MRRF. 70% of those who participated wore CL for more than 10 hours per day. The male and female ratio is almost equal in the participants participated in the research. Conclusion: Research done in the past suggest incomplete knowledge imparted to the wearer or CL forgetting the instructions given to them at dispensing. Research also suggest some CL wearer knowingly are non-compliant to MRRF. This study tries to find loopholes in a CL practice by finding reasons of non-compliance as per CL wearers prospective and probable suggestion from the user itself. An ECP is a paramedical person who has the right to prescribe them, whether according to MRRF or as per their knowledge of the patient’s ocular status. For e.g., an antibiotic medicine is supposed to be prescribed for 3 days or 5 days, once or twice is decided by the medical practitioner prescribing. As this research shows over 50% of the CL wearer said that their 'ECP said its okay'.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信