研究领导力:对定性数据收集和分析的折衷方法

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Cristina L. Eftenaru
{"title":"研究领导力:对定性数据收集和分析的折衷方法","authors":"Cristina L. Eftenaru","doi":"10.1108/qrj-08-2022-0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper describes the approach to studying leadership within the interpretive paradigm that the author undertook for their doctoral research.Design/methodology/approachFor the study, qualitative data were collected via in-depth interviews and the researcher's systematic reflections. The analytical process consisted of database design and management followed by cyclical interview and cross-interview analyses and integration of the researcher's reflections.FindingsThe paper showed that integrating various qualitative methods in pragmatic ways that better align with the research scope, along with a systematic approach to studying complex phenomena—such as leadership—generated richer and more cohesive perspectives.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper provides a detailed account of how the qualitative data collection and analysis methods were used, which could be replicated or adapted for future research within the interpretive paradigm.Practical implicationsThe paper helps students and junior researchers make sense of qualitative data analysis and interpretation by offering practical tools to tackle the diverse processes of qualitative research.Originality/valueThis paper is based on the Author's doctoral research, recording their experience with engaging in qualitative research.","PeriodicalId":47040,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying leadership: an eclectic approach to qualitative data collection and analysis\",\"authors\":\"Cristina L. Eftenaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/qrj-08-2022-0119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper describes the approach to studying leadership within the interpretive paradigm that the author undertook for their doctoral research.Design/methodology/approachFor the study, qualitative data were collected via in-depth interviews and the researcher's systematic reflections. The analytical process consisted of database design and management followed by cyclical interview and cross-interview analyses and integration of the researcher's reflections.FindingsThe paper showed that integrating various qualitative methods in pragmatic ways that better align with the research scope, along with a systematic approach to studying complex phenomena—such as leadership—generated richer and more cohesive perspectives.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper provides a detailed account of how the qualitative data collection and analysis methods were used, which could be replicated or adapted for future research within the interpretive paradigm.Practical implicationsThe paper helps students and junior researchers make sense of qualitative data analysis and interpretation by offering practical tools to tackle the diverse processes of qualitative research.Originality/valueThis paper is based on the Author's doctoral research, recording their experience with engaging in qualitative research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-08-2022-0119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-08-2022-0119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了作者在其博士研究中承担的解释范式内研究领导力的方法。设计/方法/方法在本研究中,通过深入访谈和研究者的系统反思收集了定性数据。分析过程包括数据库设计和管理,然后是周期性访谈和交叉访谈分析,并整合研究者的反思。研究结果:该论文表明,将各种定性方法以更切合研究范围的实用方式结合起来,再加上研究复杂现象(如领导力)的系统方法,可以产生更丰富、更有凝聚力的视角。研究局限性/意义本文详细说明了如何使用定性数据收集和分析方法,这些方法可以在解释范式内复制或适用于未来的研究。实际意义本文通过提供实用工具来解决定性研究的不同过程,帮助学生和初级研究人员理解定性数据分析和解释。原创性/价值本文基于作者的博士研究,记录了作者从事定性研究的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studying leadership: an eclectic approach to qualitative data collection and analysis
PurposeThis paper describes the approach to studying leadership within the interpretive paradigm that the author undertook for their doctoral research.Design/methodology/approachFor the study, qualitative data were collected via in-depth interviews and the researcher's systematic reflections. The analytical process consisted of database design and management followed by cyclical interview and cross-interview analyses and integration of the researcher's reflections.FindingsThe paper showed that integrating various qualitative methods in pragmatic ways that better align with the research scope, along with a systematic approach to studying complex phenomena—such as leadership—generated richer and more cohesive perspectives.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper provides a detailed account of how the qualitative data collection and analysis methods were used, which could be replicated or adapted for future research within the interpretive paradigm.Practical implicationsThe paper helps students and junior researchers make sense of qualitative data analysis and interpretation by offering practical tools to tackle the diverse processes of qualitative research.Originality/valueThis paper is based on the Author's doctoral research, recording their experience with engaging in qualitative research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Research Journal
Qualitative Research Journal SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research Journal (QRJ) is an international journal devoted to the communication of the theory and practice of qualitative research in the human sciences. It is interdisciplinary and eclectic, covering all methodologies that can be described as qualitative. It offers an international forum for researchers and practitioners to advance knowledge and promote good qualitative research practices. QRJ deals comprehensively with the collection, analysis and presentation of qualitative data in the human sciences as well as theoretical and conceptual inquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信