加德满都困境:重置印度与尼泊尔关系

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
N. Nayak
{"title":"加德满都困境:重置印度与尼泊尔关系","authors":"N. Nayak","doi":"10.1080/09700161.2022.2081433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he book Kathmandu Dilemma: Resetting India-Nepal Ties by Ranjit Rae, a former Indian Ambassador to Nepal (September 2013 to February 2017), is timely, given that bilateral relations have been marred by numerous controversies in the recent past. Nepal has sent two diplomatic notes—September 2021 and November 2019—to India in the last few years. Accusations in Nepal of India meddling in its internal affairs during the 2021 constitutional crisis, have further vitiated the atmosphere. The India-Nepal relationship has been in perpetual controversy since the formation of the Gorkha Empire in 1768 by Prithvi Narayan Shah, who advised his subjects to have limited interactions with the southerners. The Nepalese perception of India has been driven by the need of rulers in Nepal to manage their political insecurities. These perceptions were gradually validated by negligence from the Indian side to respect the sensitivities in the relationship. Over the last 70 years, the policymakers and academia in both countries have been trying to understand whether the perceptions added complexity in the relationship or the contentious issues shaped perceptions. Ambassador Rae is eminently qualified to traverse through the landscape of the relationship given his vast experience when the Himalayan country was at the peak of its political turmoil. A large portion of the book—except two chapters that deal with boundaries and treaties—is based on the author’s experiences in Nepal while handling complex bilateral issues. Therefore, at the outset, the author has clarified that the book is based on experiences and assessments of someone who has had a ringside view of some of the major developments in Nepal over the last decade. The book is well-structured with ten chapters. Primarily, it deals with three issues —perceptions of each other, unaddressed contentious issues, and growing Chinese footprints in Nepal. It starts with one of the unresolved questions in bilateral relations—why don’t the Nepalese like India or Indians? The book examines growing Chinese influence in Nepal and offers some recommendations as the way forward, to make the Indo-Nepal relationship beneficial to both countries. The author should be commended for providing details about emotional outbursts and illogical arguments of certain sections of Nepalese media, civil society and political class towards India. Even India’s humanitarian assistance during the 2015 Strategic Analysis, 2022 Vol. 46, No. 3, 342–344, https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2022.2081433","PeriodicalId":45012,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Analysis","volume":"46 1","pages":"342 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kathmandu Dilemma: Resetting India-Nepal Ties\",\"authors\":\"N. Nayak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09700161.2022.2081433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T he book Kathmandu Dilemma: Resetting India-Nepal Ties by Ranjit Rae, a former Indian Ambassador to Nepal (September 2013 to February 2017), is timely, given that bilateral relations have been marred by numerous controversies in the recent past. Nepal has sent two diplomatic notes—September 2021 and November 2019—to India in the last few years. Accusations in Nepal of India meddling in its internal affairs during the 2021 constitutional crisis, have further vitiated the atmosphere. The India-Nepal relationship has been in perpetual controversy since the formation of the Gorkha Empire in 1768 by Prithvi Narayan Shah, who advised his subjects to have limited interactions with the southerners. The Nepalese perception of India has been driven by the need of rulers in Nepal to manage their political insecurities. These perceptions were gradually validated by negligence from the Indian side to respect the sensitivities in the relationship. Over the last 70 years, the policymakers and academia in both countries have been trying to understand whether the perceptions added complexity in the relationship or the contentious issues shaped perceptions. Ambassador Rae is eminently qualified to traverse through the landscape of the relationship given his vast experience when the Himalayan country was at the peak of its political turmoil. A large portion of the book—except two chapters that deal with boundaries and treaties—is based on the author’s experiences in Nepal while handling complex bilateral issues. Therefore, at the outset, the author has clarified that the book is based on experiences and assessments of someone who has had a ringside view of some of the major developments in Nepal over the last decade. The book is well-structured with ten chapters. Primarily, it deals with three issues —perceptions of each other, unaddressed contentious issues, and growing Chinese footprints in Nepal. It starts with one of the unresolved questions in bilateral relations—why don’t the Nepalese like India or Indians? The book examines growing Chinese influence in Nepal and offers some recommendations as the way forward, to make the Indo-Nepal relationship beneficial to both countries. The author should be commended for providing details about emotional outbursts and illogical arguments of certain sections of Nepalese media, civil society and political class towards India. Even India’s humanitarian assistance during the 2015 Strategic Analysis, 2022 Vol. 46, No. 3, 342–344, https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2022.2081433\",\"PeriodicalId\":45012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Analysis\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"342 - 344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2022.2081433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2022.2081433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

前印度驻尼泊尔大使兰吉特·雷(Ranjit Rae)(2013年9月至2017年2月)所著的《加德满都困境:重置印度-尼泊尔关系》是及时的,因为双边关系在最近的过去受到了许多争议的损害。在过去几年里,尼泊尔分别于2021年9月和2019年11月向印度发出了两份外交照会。尼泊尔指责印度在2021年宪法危机期间干涉其内政,这进一步破坏了气氛。自1768年由普里特维·纳拉扬·沙阿(Prithvi Narayan Shah)建立廓尔喀帝国以来,印度与尼泊尔的关系一直存在争议,他建议他的臣民与南方人保持有限的互动。尼泊尔人对印度的看法是由尼泊尔统治者需要管理他们的政治不安全感所驱动的。由于印方忽视了两国关系的敏感性,这些看法逐渐得到了证实。在过去的70年里,两国的政策制定者和学术界一直在试图理解,是这种看法增加了两国关系的复杂性,还是有争议的问题影响了两国的看法。考虑到雷大使在这个喜马拉雅国家处于政治动荡高峰时期的丰富经验,他完全有资格对两国关系进行全面阐述。除了涉及边界和条约的两章外,书中的大部分内容都是基于作者在处理复杂的双边问题时在尼泊尔的经历。因此,在一开始,作者就澄清说,这本书是基于一个人的经验和评估,他在过去十年里对尼泊尔的一些重大发展有一个旁观者的看法。这本书有十章,结构很好。它主要涉及三个问题——对彼此的看法,未解决的争议问题,以及中国在尼泊尔日益增长的足迹。它始于双边关系中一个悬而未决的问题——为什么尼泊尔人不喜欢印度或印度人?这本书考察了中国在尼泊尔日益增长的影响力,并提出了一些建议,以使印尼关系对两国都有利。值得赞扬的是,作者详细描述了尼泊尔媒体、民间社会和政治阶层对印度的情绪爆发和不合逻辑的论点。《2015年战略分析》,2022年第46卷第3期,342-344页,https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2022.2081433
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kathmandu Dilemma: Resetting India-Nepal Ties
T he book Kathmandu Dilemma: Resetting India-Nepal Ties by Ranjit Rae, a former Indian Ambassador to Nepal (September 2013 to February 2017), is timely, given that bilateral relations have been marred by numerous controversies in the recent past. Nepal has sent two diplomatic notes—September 2021 and November 2019—to India in the last few years. Accusations in Nepal of India meddling in its internal affairs during the 2021 constitutional crisis, have further vitiated the atmosphere. The India-Nepal relationship has been in perpetual controversy since the formation of the Gorkha Empire in 1768 by Prithvi Narayan Shah, who advised his subjects to have limited interactions with the southerners. The Nepalese perception of India has been driven by the need of rulers in Nepal to manage their political insecurities. These perceptions were gradually validated by negligence from the Indian side to respect the sensitivities in the relationship. Over the last 70 years, the policymakers and academia in both countries have been trying to understand whether the perceptions added complexity in the relationship or the contentious issues shaped perceptions. Ambassador Rae is eminently qualified to traverse through the landscape of the relationship given his vast experience when the Himalayan country was at the peak of its political turmoil. A large portion of the book—except two chapters that deal with boundaries and treaties—is based on the author’s experiences in Nepal while handling complex bilateral issues. Therefore, at the outset, the author has clarified that the book is based on experiences and assessments of someone who has had a ringside view of some of the major developments in Nepal over the last decade. The book is well-structured with ten chapters. Primarily, it deals with three issues —perceptions of each other, unaddressed contentious issues, and growing Chinese footprints in Nepal. It starts with one of the unresolved questions in bilateral relations—why don’t the Nepalese like India or Indians? The book examines growing Chinese influence in Nepal and offers some recommendations as the way forward, to make the Indo-Nepal relationship beneficial to both countries. The author should be commended for providing details about emotional outbursts and illogical arguments of certain sections of Nepalese media, civil society and political class towards India. Even India’s humanitarian assistance during the 2015 Strategic Analysis, 2022 Vol. 46, No. 3, 342–344, https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2022.2081433
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategic Analysis
Strategic Analysis INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信