Indirect Effects of Regulatory Changes: Evidence From the Acceleration of the 10-K Filing Deadline

This study responds to a recent call for research on the indirect effects of regulatory changes and examines the audit office effects of changes in client time pressure, using the first acceleration of the 10-K filing deadline as the primary research setting. The extant literature provides evidence that increased client time pressure adversely affects the timing and quality of individual engagements. We argue that because audit offices possess finite resources and production capacity, client-level pressure can have office-level effects. We document within-office differences related to changes in audit timeliness. In the same audit office, clients with no pressure (with pressure) experience an increase (a decrease) in audit report lag post-acceleration. This evidence suggests that auditors alter the timing of concurrent engagements in response to client pressure, and clients of the same office are affected differently by changes in time pressure. We also document across-office differences in audit/filing timeliness and audit quality. Clients of audit offices with more time pressure across the entire client portfolio have a greater increase in audit delay, are more likely to file late, and experience lower audit quality. Taken as a whole, our results are consistent with client pressure producing office effects as a result of the auditors’ response to increased resource constraints. These results should be informative to regulators and practitioners, because they suggest there are indirect costs associated with regulation and such effects are not limited to directly affected clients. Further, the results indicate that auditors do not always respond to changes in resource requirements in a manner that prevents undue strain.