在不同类型的自然区域,狗主人的拴绳行为

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Lily M. van Eeden, Andrew Geschke, Fern Hames, Z. Squires, M. Weston
{"title":"在不同类型的自然区域,狗主人的拴绳行为","authors":"Lily M. van Eeden, Andrew Geschke, Fern Hames, Z. Squires, M. Weston","doi":"10.1080/10871209.2022.2077482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Encouraging compliance with dog leashing regulations in natural areas is a priority for land managers seeking to protect wildlife. We surveyed residents of Victoria, Australia, to document self-reported leashing behavior by dog owners in different habitat types, exploring demographic, attitudinal, and belief variables as predictors of compliance. We found support for leashing regulations among dog owners (n = 313) and those without dogs (n = 711), but generally low reported compliance by owners. Social norms about leashing predicted leashing at all areas, and habits (i.e., leashing where leashing was not regulated) predicted compliance with regulations. Older age and beliefs about wildlife protection predicted compliance in water-based areas (e.g., beaches, wetlands) and beliefs that off-leash roaming is beneficial to dogs predicted compliance in other natural areas (e.g., hiking trails). Exploring these context-based differences allows managers to identify and understand target groups to design tailored messaging and other behavior change interventions.","PeriodicalId":56068,"journal":{"name":"Human Dimensions of Wildlife","volume":"28 1","pages":"356 - 371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The leashing behavior of dog owners in different types of natural areas\",\"authors\":\"Lily M. van Eeden, Andrew Geschke, Fern Hames, Z. Squires, M. Weston\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10871209.2022.2077482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Encouraging compliance with dog leashing regulations in natural areas is a priority for land managers seeking to protect wildlife. We surveyed residents of Victoria, Australia, to document self-reported leashing behavior by dog owners in different habitat types, exploring demographic, attitudinal, and belief variables as predictors of compliance. We found support for leashing regulations among dog owners (n = 313) and those without dogs (n = 711), but generally low reported compliance by owners. Social norms about leashing predicted leashing at all areas, and habits (i.e., leashing where leashing was not regulated) predicted compliance with regulations. Older age and beliefs about wildlife protection predicted compliance in water-based areas (e.g., beaches, wetlands) and beliefs that off-leash roaming is beneficial to dogs predicted compliance in other natural areas (e.g., hiking trails). Exploring these context-based differences allows managers to identify and understand target groups to design tailored messaging and other behavior change interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Dimensions of Wildlife\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"356 - 371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Dimensions of Wildlife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2022.2077482\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Dimensions of Wildlife","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2022.2077482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要鼓励在自然区域遵守拴狗规定是寻求保护野生动物的土地管理者的首要任务。我们调查了澳大利亚维多利亚州的居民,记录了不同栖息地类型的狗主人自我报告的拴狗行为,探索了人口统计学、态度和信念变量作为依从性的预测因素。我们发现,养狗人(n=313)和没有养狗的人(n=711)支持拴狗规定,但据报道,狗主人的遵守率普遍较低。关于拴绳的社会规范预测了所有区域的拴绳行为,而习惯(即在不受监管的地方拴绳)预测了遵守法规的情况。年龄较大和对野生动物保护的信念预测了在水性区域(如海滩、湿地)的合规性,而不拴绳漫游对狗有益的信念则预测了在其他自然区域(如徒步小径)的合规性。探索这些基于情境的差异可以让管理者识别和理解目标群体,从而设计量身定制的信息传递和其他行为改变干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The leashing behavior of dog owners in different types of natural areas
ABSTRACT Encouraging compliance with dog leashing regulations in natural areas is a priority for land managers seeking to protect wildlife. We surveyed residents of Victoria, Australia, to document self-reported leashing behavior by dog owners in different habitat types, exploring demographic, attitudinal, and belief variables as predictors of compliance. We found support for leashing regulations among dog owners (n = 313) and those without dogs (n = 711), but generally low reported compliance by owners. Social norms about leashing predicted leashing at all areas, and habits (i.e., leashing where leashing was not regulated) predicted compliance with regulations. Older age and beliefs about wildlife protection predicted compliance in water-based areas (e.g., beaches, wetlands) and beliefs that off-leash roaming is beneficial to dogs predicted compliance in other natural areas (e.g., hiking trails). Exploring these context-based differences allows managers to identify and understand target groups to design tailored messaging and other behavior change interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Dimensions of Wildlife
Human Dimensions of Wildlife Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Human Dimensions of Wildlife is devoted to the study of social considerations in fisheries and wildlife management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信