Ricardo Danil Guiraldo, Sandrine Bittencourt Berger, Fernando dos Santos Rocha, Gabriela Miranda Rodrigues Pereira, Anderson Rafael Aleixo, Américo Bortolazzo Correr, Edwin Fernando Ruiz Contreras, Alcides Gonini-Júnior, Murilo Baena Lopes
{"title":"牙釉质粗糙度与牙釉质复合材料托槽抗剪强度的比较","authors":"Ricardo Danil Guiraldo, Sandrine Bittencourt Berger, Fernando dos Santos Rocha, Gabriela Miranda Rodrigues Pereira, Anderson Rafael Aleixo, Américo Bortolazzo Correr, Edwin Fernando Ruiz Contreras, Alcides Gonini-Júnior, Murilo Baena Lopes","doi":"10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the enamel roughness and shear bond strength (SBS) of dental composite after removal of metal brackets bonded with different materials (Transbond XT, Filtek Z100, Venus Diamond and Filtek P90). Cleaning and etching were performed in vitro on 60 premolars, which were then divided into four groups (n?=?15). A metal bracket was bonded to each tooth using one of the four materials. The SBS test was performed in an Instron universal testing machine, using a chisel positioned at the junction interface with a speed of 1.0?mm/min. After testing the SBS, the teeth were analyzed using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) with a stereomicroscope under 40× magnification. The remainder of the bonding material was removed with multilaminated carbide bur (FF 9642) and the surface roughness measured. The SBS and roughness data were statistically analyzed. The average SBS for the different groups in this study ranged from 6.13 to 12.72?MPa; Transbond XT (12.57?MPa) and Filtek Z100 (12.72?MPa) showed the highest values. There were differences between the bonding materials in IRA scores, but no statistically significant difference for roughness. All SBS values were adequate, since none were below the minimum acceptable level (6–8?MPa), however the enamel did not return to the conditions present prior to the bonding of the brackets.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2016-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of shear strength of brackets with different dental composites and enamel roughness\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Danil Guiraldo, Sandrine Bittencourt Berger, Fernando dos Santos Rocha, Gabriela Miranda Rodrigues Pereira, Anderson Rafael Aleixo, Américo Bortolazzo Correr, Edwin Fernando Ruiz Contreras, Alcides Gonini-Júnior, Murilo Baena Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the enamel roughness and shear bond strength (SBS) of dental composite after removal of metal brackets bonded with different materials (Transbond XT, Filtek Z100, Venus Diamond and Filtek P90). Cleaning and etching were performed in vitro on 60 premolars, which were then divided into four groups (n?=?15). A metal bracket was bonded to each tooth using one of the four materials. The SBS test was performed in an Instron universal testing machine, using a chisel positioned at the junction interface with a speed of 1.0?mm/min. After testing the SBS, the teeth were analyzed using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) with a stereomicroscope under 40× magnification. The remainder of the bonding material was removed with multilaminated carbide bur (FF 9642) and the surface roughness measured. The SBS and roughness data were statistically analyzed. The average SBS for the different groups in this study ranged from 6.13 to 12.72?MPa; Transbond XT (12.57?MPa) and Filtek Z100 (12.72?MPa) showed the highest values. There were differences between the bonding materials in IRA scores, but no statistically significant difference for roughness. All SBS values were adequate, since none were below the minimum acceptable level (6–8?MPa), however the enamel did not return to the conditions present prior to the bonding of the brackets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6800,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of shear strength of brackets with different dental composites and enamel roughness
The objective of this study was to evaluate the enamel roughness and shear bond strength (SBS) of dental composite after removal of metal brackets bonded with different materials (Transbond XT, Filtek Z100, Venus Diamond and Filtek P90). Cleaning and etching were performed in vitro on 60 premolars, which were then divided into four groups (n?=?15). A metal bracket was bonded to each tooth using one of the four materials. The SBS test was performed in an Instron universal testing machine, using a chisel positioned at the junction interface with a speed of 1.0?mm/min. After testing the SBS, the teeth were analyzed using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) with a stereomicroscope under 40× magnification. The remainder of the bonding material was removed with multilaminated carbide bur (FF 9642) and the surface roughness measured. The SBS and roughness data were statistically analyzed. The average SBS for the different groups in this study ranged from 6.13 to 12.72?MPa; Transbond XT (12.57?MPa) and Filtek Z100 (12.72?MPa) showed the highest values. There were differences between the bonding materials in IRA scores, but no statistically significant difference for roughness. All SBS values were adequate, since none were below the minimum acceptable level (6–8?MPa), however the enamel did not return to the conditions present prior to the bonding of the brackets.
期刊介绍:
Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.