牙釉质粗糙度与牙釉质复合材料托槽抗剪强度的比较

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry
Ricardo Danil Guiraldo, Sandrine Bittencourt Berger, Fernando dos Santos Rocha, Gabriela Miranda Rodrigues Pereira, Anderson Rafael Aleixo, Américo Bortolazzo Correr, Edwin Fernando Ruiz Contreras, Alcides Gonini-Júnior, Murilo Baena Lopes
{"title":"牙釉质粗糙度与牙釉质复合材料托槽抗剪强度的比较","authors":"Ricardo Danil Guiraldo,&nbsp;Sandrine Bittencourt Berger,&nbsp;Fernando dos Santos Rocha,&nbsp;Gabriela Miranda Rodrigues Pereira,&nbsp;Anderson Rafael Aleixo,&nbsp;Américo Bortolazzo Correr,&nbsp;Edwin Fernando Ruiz Contreras,&nbsp;Alcides Gonini-Júnior,&nbsp;Murilo Baena Lopes","doi":"10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the enamel roughness and shear bond strength (SBS) of dental composite after removal of metal brackets bonded with different materials (Transbond XT, Filtek Z100, Venus Diamond and Filtek P90). Cleaning and etching were performed in vitro on 60 premolars, which were then divided into four groups (n?=?15). A metal bracket was bonded to each tooth using one of the four materials. The SBS test was performed in an Instron universal testing machine, using a chisel positioned at the junction interface with a speed of 1.0?mm/min. After testing the SBS, the teeth were analyzed using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) with a stereomicroscope under 40× magnification. The remainder of the bonding material was removed with multilaminated carbide bur (FF 9642) and the surface roughness measured. The SBS and roughness data were statistically analyzed. The average SBS for the different groups in this study ranged from 6.13 to 12.72?MPa; Transbond XT (12.57?MPa) and Filtek Z100 (12.72?MPa) showed the highest values. There were differences between the bonding materials in IRA scores, but no statistically significant difference for roughness. All SBS values were adequate, since none were below the minimum acceptable level (6–8?MPa), however the enamel did not return to the conditions present prior to the bonding of the brackets.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2016-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of shear strength of brackets with different dental composites and enamel roughness\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Danil Guiraldo,&nbsp;Sandrine Bittencourt Berger,&nbsp;Fernando dos Santos Rocha,&nbsp;Gabriela Miranda Rodrigues Pereira,&nbsp;Anderson Rafael Aleixo,&nbsp;Américo Bortolazzo Correr,&nbsp;Edwin Fernando Ruiz Contreras,&nbsp;Alcides Gonini-Júnior,&nbsp;Murilo Baena Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the enamel roughness and shear bond strength (SBS) of dental composite after removal of metal brackets bonded with different materials (Transbond XT, Filtek Z100, Venus Diamond and Filtek P90). Cleaning and etching were performed in vitro on 60 premolars, which were then divided into four groups (n?=?15). A metal bracket was bonded to each tooth using one of the four materials. The SBS test was performed in an Instron universal testing machine, using a chisel positioned at the junction interface with a speed of 1.0?mm/min. After testing the SBS, the teeth were analyzed using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) with a stereomicroscope under 40× magnification. The remainder of the bonding material was removed with multilaminated carbide bur (FF 9642) and the surface roughness measured. The SBS and roughness data were statistically analyzed. The average SBS for the different groups in this study ranged from 6.13 to 12.72?MPa; Transbond XT (12.57?MPa) and Filtek Z100 (12.72?MPa) showed the highest values. There were differences between the bonding materials in IRA scores, but no statistically significant difference for roughness. All SBS values were adequate, since none were below the minimum acceptable level (6–8?MPa), however the enamel did not return to the conditions present prior to the bonding of the brackets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6800,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0065-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究的目的是评估不同材料(Transbond XT、Filtek Z100、Venus Diamond和Filtek P90)粘接的金属托槽去除后牙釉质粗糙度和剪切粘接强度(SBS)。对60颗前磨牙进行体外清洁和蚀刻,并将其分为4组(n = 15)。用四种材料中的一种将金属支架固定在每颗牙齿上。SBS测试在Instron万能试验机上进行,使用定位在连接处的凿子,速度为1.0 mm/min。测定SBS后,在40倍体视显微镜下用黏合剂残余指数(ARI)对牙体进行分析。用多层硬质合金钎头(FF 9642)去除剩余的粘结材料,并测量表面粗糙度。对SBS和粗糙度数据进行统计分析。本研究各组平均SBS为6.13 ~ 12.72 MPa;Transbond XT (12.57?MPa)和Filtek Z100 (12.72?MPa)最大。不同粘结材料的IRA评分存在差异,但粗糙度差异无统计学意义。所有的SBS值都是足够的,因为没有一个低于最低可接受水平(6 - 8mpa),但是牙釉质没有恢复到支架粘合之前的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of shear strength of brackets with different dental composites and enamel roughness

The objective of this study was to evaluate the enamel roughness and shear bond strength (SBS) of dental composite after removal of metal brackets bonded with different materials (Transbond XT, Filtek Z100, Venus Diamond and Filtek P90). Cleaning and etching were performed in vitro on 60 premolars, which were then divided into four groups (n?=?15). A metal bracket was bonded to each tooth using one of the four materials. The SBS test was performed in an Instron universal testing machine, using a chisel positioned at the junction interface with a speed of 1.0?mm/min. After testing the SBS, the teeth were analyzed using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) with a stereomicroscope under 40× magnification. The remainder of the bonding material was removed with multilaminated carbide bur (FF 9642) and the surface roughness measured. The SBS and roughness data were statistically analyzed. The average SBS for the different groups in this study ranged from 6.13 to 12.72?MPa; Transbond XT (12.57?MPa) and Filtek Z100 (12.72?MPa) showed the highest values. There were differences between the bonding materials in IRA scores, but no statistically significant difference for roughness. All SBS values were adequate, since none were below the minimum acceptable level (6–8?MPa), however the enamel did not return to the conditions present prior to the bonding of the brackets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信