废除青少年司法制度:儿童优先,罪犯无处藏身

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Stephen Case, K. Haines
{"title":"废除青少年司法制度:儿童优先,罪犯无处藏身","authors":"Stephen Case, K. Haines","doi":"10.1177/1473225419898754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 1980s decade of diversion in UK youth justice consolidated critiques of iatrogenic systemic contact and generated an abolitionist momentum that was significantly reversed by the 1990s punitive turn and ‘new youth justice’ strategies of modernisation, expansionism, interventionism and risk management. However, the tentative rejection of risk management and the rebirth of diversion in contemporary youth justice offer new hope for abolitionist arguments. This article critically evaluates contemporary abolitionist arguments, asserting that Children First definitions and diversionary, Bureau model responses could coalesce to form an innovative paradigm to replace traditional, formal conceptions of youth justice ‘systems’.","PeriodicalId":45886,"journal":{"name":"Youth Justice-An International Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"3 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473225419898754","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abolishing Youth Justice Systems: Children First, Offenders Nowhere\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Case, K. Haines\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1473225419898754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 1980s decade of diversion in UK youth justice consolidated critiques of iatrogenic systemic contact and generated an abolitionist momentum that was significantly reversed by the 1990s punitive turn and ‘new youth justice’ strategies of modernisation, expansionism, interventionism and risk management. However, the tentative rejection of risk management and the rebirth of diversion in contemporary youth justice offer new hope for abolitionist arguments. This article critically evaluates contemporary abolitionist arguments, asserting that Children First definitions and diversionary, Bureau model responses could coalesce to form an innovative paradigm to replace traditional, formal conceptions of youth justice ‘systems’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Youth Justice-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473225419898754\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Youth Justice-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225419898754\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth Justice-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225419898754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

20世纪80年代英国青年司法的转向巩固了对医源性系统性接触的批评,并产生了废奴主义的势头,而20世纪90年代的惩罚性转向和现代化、扩张主义、干预主义和风险管理的“新青年司法”战略大大扭转了这一势头。然而,对风险管理的暂时拒绝和当代青年司法中转移注意力的重生为废奴主义的论点提供了新的希望。这篇文章批判性地评价了当代废奴主义者的论点,声称儿童优先的定义和转移注意力的、局式的回应可以结合起来,形成一种创新的范式,以取代传统的、正式的青年司法“系统”概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abolishing Youth Justice Systems: Children First, Offenders Nowhere
The 1980s decade of diversion in UK youth justice consolidated critiques of iatrogenic systemic contact and generated an abolitionist momentum that was significantly reversed by the 1990s punitive turn and ‘new youth justice’ strategies of modernisation, expansionism, interventionism and risk management. However, the tentative rejection of risk management and the rebirth of diversion in contemporary youth justice offer new hope for abolitionist arguments. This article critically evaluates contemporary abolitionist arguments, asserting that Children First definitions and diversionary, Bureau model responses could coalesce to form an innovative paradigm to replace traditional, formal conceptions of youth justice ‘systems’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Youth Justice-An International Journal
Youth Justice-An International Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Youth Justice is an international, peer-reviewed journal that engages with the analyses of juvenile/youth justice systems, law, policy and practice around the world. It contains articles that are theoretically informed and/or grounded in the latest empirical research. Youth Justice has established itself as the leading journal in the field in the UK, and, supported by an editorial board comprising some of the world"s leading youth justice scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信