细叶Prosopis juliflora(Sw.)DC基因组DNA提取方案的比较分析

L. H. Santos, Cibelle Santos Dias, Jardyelle Carvalho Lima, Messulan Rodrigues Meira, C. B. M. Cerqueira-Silva
{"title":"细叶Prosopis juliflora(Sw.)DC基因组DNA提取方案的比较分析","authors":"L. H. Santos, Cibelle Santos Dias, Jardyelle Carvalho Lima, Messulan Rodrigues Meira, C. B. M. Cerqueira-Silva","doi":"10.5007/2175-7925.2021.E76552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present research was to compare the efficiency among seven protocols adapted for the extraction of genomic DNA from the species Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. The protocols used were based on their buffers: SDS 10%, CTAB 5%, Sorbitol, CTAB 3% and Sorbitol, SDS 0.7% and NaCl, CTAB 2%, CTAB 2% and NaCl 1.4M. In all tests, the use of β-mercaptoethanol, liquid nitrogen, proteinase K and RNAses was eliminated. The samples consisted of leaf primordia in each specimen in triplicate. The quantity and quality of the extracted DNA were evaluated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel and by reading the absorbances in a spectrophotometer. For amplification reactions, the ISSR primer was used. Among the tested extraction buffers, SDS 10%, CTAB 5% and CTAB 3%, and Sorbitol were the most efficient for P. juliflora. Of these three protocols, CTAB 3% and Sorbitol showed a better level of purity despite the lower amount of DNA (123 ng/µL) compared to 10% SDS and 5% CTAB buffers (312 and 321 ng/µL, respectively, and high content of contaminants). We conclude that it is possible to use extraction protocols without additives that are harmful to human health and at a lower cost in the extraction process.","PeriodicalId":29999,"journal":{"name":"Biotemas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análise comparativa de protocolos para extração de DNA genômico em Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC\",\"authors\":\"L. H. Santos, Cibelle Santos Dias, Jardyelle Carvalho Lima, Messulan Rodrigues Meira, C. B. M. Cerqueira-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2175-7925.2021.E76552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the present research was to compare the efficiency among seven protocols adapted for the extraction of genomic DNA from the species Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. The protocols used were based on their buffers: SDS 10%, CTAB 5%, Sorbitol, CTAB 3% and Sorbitol, SDS 0.7% and NaCl, CTAB 2%, CTAB 2% and NaCl 1.4M. In all tests, the use of β-mercaptoethanol, liquid nitrogen, proteinase K and RNAses was eliminated. The samples consisted of leaf primordia in each specimen in triplicate. The quantity and quality of the extracted DNA were evaluated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel and by reading the absorbances in a spectrophotometer. For amplification reactions, the ISSR primer was used. Among the tested extraction buffers, SDS 10%, CTAB 5% and CTAB 3%, and Sorbitol were the most efficient for P. juliflora. Of these three protocols, CTAB 3% and Sorbitol showed a better level of purity despite the lower amount of DNA (123 ng/µL) compared to 10% SDS and 5% CTAB buffers (312 and 321 ng/µL, respectively, and high content of contaminants). We conclude that it is possible to use extraction protocols without additives that are harmful to human health and at a lower cost in the extraction process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotemas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2021.E76552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2021.E76552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较适用于从Prosopis juliflora(Sw.)DC中提取基因组DNA的七种方案的效率。使用的方案基于它们的缓冲液:SDS 10%,CTAB 5%,山梨醇,CTAB 3%和山梨醇,SDS 0.7%和NaCl,CTAB 2%,CTAB 2%和NaCl 1.4M。在所有测试中,消除了β-巯基乙醇、液氮、蛋白酶K和RNA酶的使用。样品由每个样品中的叶原基组成,一式三份。提取的DNA的数量和质量通过在1%琼脂糖凝胶中的电泳和通过在分光光度计中读取吸光度来评估。对于扩增反应,使用ISSR引物。在所测试的提取缓冲液中,SDS 10%、CTAB 5%和CTAB 3%以及山梨醇对菊芋的提取效率最高。在这三种方案中,尽管与10%SDS和5%CTAB缓冲液(分别为312和321 ng/ml,污染物含量高)相比,DNA含量较低(123 ng/ml),但3%的CTAB和山梨醇显示出更好的纯度。我们得出的结论是,在提取过程中使用不含对人体健康有害且成本较低的添加剂的提取方案是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Análise comparativa de protocolos para extração de DNA genômico em Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC
The objective of the present research was to compare the efficiency among seven protocols adapted for the extraction of genomic DNA from the species Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. The protocols used were based on their buffers: SDS 10%, CTAB 5%, Sorbitol, CTAB 3% and Sorbitol, SDS 0.7% and NaCl, CTAB 2%, CTAB 2% and NaCl 1.4M. In all tests, the use of β-mercaptoethanol, liquid nitrogen, proteinase K and RNAses was eliminated. The samples consisted of leaf primordia in each specimen in triplicate. The quantity and quality of the extracted DNA were evaluated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel and by reading the absorbances in a spectrophotometer. For amplification reactions, the ISSR primer was used. Among the tested extraction buffers, SDS 10%, CTAB 5% and CTAB 3%, and Sorbitol were the most efficient for P. juliflora. Of these three protocols, CTAB 3% and Sorbitol showed a better level of purity despite the lower amount of DNA (123 ng/µL) compared to 10% SDS and 5% CTAB buffers (312 and 321 ng/µL, respectively, and high content of contaminants). We conclude that it is possible to use extraction protocols without additives that are harmful to human health and at a lower cost in the extraction process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信