可汗国连词的出现与短语协调

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Lena Borise, K. Kiss
{"title":"可汗国连词的出现与短语协调","authors":"Lena Borise, K. Kiss","doi":"10.1075/jhl.21016.kis","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Prior to widespread contact with Russian, Khanty (Uralic; Finno-Ugric) did not have overt conjunctions or phrasal\n coordination. Instead, Khanty texts from the late 19th–early 20th centuries only include examples of conjunction-less clausal juxtaposition,\n which was used for both clausal and phrasal coordination. By comparing Khanty texts over the 20th century, we trace the emergence of overt\n conjunctions and coordination of phrasal constituents. We show that overt conjunctions first appeared in the context of clausal\n coordination, followed by coordination of smaller phrases. Based on novel elicitation data, we demonstrate that, in contemporary Khanty, (i)\n overt conjunctions are commonplace, (ii) coordinated clausal constituents may be derived via phrasal coordination or clausal coordination\n with conjunction reduction/ellipsis, but (iii) ellipsis of syntactic heads is banned (nouns & postpositions) or dispreferred (verbs).\n Based on this diachronic picture, we conclude that the coordination of phrasal constituents only emerged in Khanty once overt conjunctions\n became available. We derive this correlation from the Maximize On-line Processing principle (Hawkins\n 2004), and show that this maxim, usually invoked in the context of speech planning and production, can be successfully applied to\n modelling language change.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The emergence of conjunctions and phrasal coordination in Khanty\",\"authors\":\"Lena Borise, K. Kiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhl.21016.kis\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Prior to widespread contact with Russian, Khanty (Uralic; Finno-Ugric) did not have overt conjunctions or phrasal\\n coordination. Instead, Khanty texts from the late 19th–early 20th centuries only include examples of conjunction-less clausal juxtaposition,\\n which was used for both clausal and phrasal coordination. By comparing Khanty texts over the 20th century, we trace the emergence of overt\\n conjunctions and coordination of phrasal constituents. We show that overt conjunctions first appeared in the context of clausal\\n coordination, followed by coordination of smaller phrases. Based on novel elicitation data, we demonstrate that, in contemporary Khanty, (i)\\n overt conjunctions are commonplace, (ii) coordinated clausal constituents may be derived via phrasal coordination or clausal coordination\\n with conjunction reduction/ellipsis, but (iii) ellipsis of syntactic heads is banned (nouns & postpositions) or dispreferred (verbs).\\n Based on this diachronic picture, we conclude that the coordination of phrasal constituents only emerged in Khanty once overt conjunctions\\n became available. We derive this correlation from the Maximize On-line Processing principle (Hawkins\\n 2004), and show that this maxim, usually invoked in the context of speech planning and production, can be successfully applied to\\n modelling language change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21016.kis\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21016.kis","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在与俄罗斯人广泛接触之前,Khanty(乌拉尔语;芬诺-乌戈尔语)没有明显的连词或短语协调。相反,19世纪末至20世纪初的可汗文本只包括无连词从句并置的例子,用于从句和短语的协调。通过比较20世纪的可汗文本,我们追溯了显性连词的出现和短语成分的协调。我们发现,显性连词首先出现在小句协调的语境中,其次是小短语的协调。基于新的启发数据,我们证明,在当代可汗国,(i)显性连词是常见的,(ii)协调的小句成分可以通过短语协调或带有连词减少/省略的小句协调来派生,但(iii)句法首词的省略是被禁止的(名词和后置词)或被否定的(动词)。基于这一历时性的图景,我们得出结论,只有当显性连词出现时,短语成分的协调才出现在可汗国。我们从最大化在线处理原理(Hawkins 2004)中得出了这种相关性,并表明这条通常在语音规划和制作中使用的格言可以成功地应用于语言变化的建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The emergence of conjunctions and phrasal coordination in Khanty
Prior to widespread contact with Russian, Khanty (Uralic; Finno-Ugric) did not have overt conjunctions or phrasal coordination. Instead, Khanty texts from the late 19th–early 20th centuries only include examples of conjunction-less clausal juxtaposition, which was used for both clausal and phrasal coordination. By comparing Khanty texts over the 20th century, we trace the emergence of overt conjunctions and coordination of phrasal constituents. We show that overt conjunctions first appeared in the context of clausal coordination, followed by coordination of smaller phrases. Based on novel elicitation data, we demonstrate that, in contemporary Khanty, (i) overt conjunctions are commonplace, (ii) coordinated clausal constituents may be derived via phrasal coordination or clausal coordination with conjunction reduction/ellipsis, but (iii) ellipsis of syntactic heads is banned (nouns & postpositions) or dispreferred (verbs). Based on this diachronic picture, we conclude that the coordination of phrasal constituents only emerged in Khanty once overt conjunctions became available. We derive this correlation from the Maximize On-line Processing principle (Hawkins 2004), and show that this maxim, usually invoked in the context of speech planning and production, can be successfully applied to modelling language change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Journal of Historical Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信