通过获取法律信息来缩小“司法差距”:在公共图书馆建立司法获取入口

Beth Bilson, Brea Lowenberger, G. Sharp
{"title":"通过获取法律信息来缩小“司法差距”:在公共图书馆建立司法获取入口","authors":"Beth Bilson, Brea Lowenberger, G. Sharp","doi":"10.22329/WYAJ.V34I2.5020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the strategies to improve public access to justice, increasing the accessibility and comprehensibility of legal information must be ranked as important. In this paper, the authors explore how libraries and librarians might play a role in providing the public with access and guidance to legal information. These issues are considered primarily in the context of two scenarios: that of the self-represented litigant, and that of a party to a limited scope retainer. The authors consider in particular how public libraries as a public space and public librarians as trusted intermediaries might support the objective of greater access. The possible roles of law society/courthouse and academic libraries in training and collection development are also considered. The distinction between providing access to legal information and giving legal advice is discussed briefly, and the authors suggest some possible ways of clarifying this distinction while pursuing the goal of expanding public access to legal information.","PeriodicalId":56232,"journal":{"name":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","volume":"34 1","pages":"99-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing the 'Justice Gap' Through Access to Legal Information: Establishing Access to Justice Entry Points at Public Libraries\",\"authors\":\"Beth Bilson, Brea Lowenberger, G. Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.22329/WYAJ.V34I2.5020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the strategies to improve public access to justice, increasing the accessibility and comprehensibility of legal information must be ranked as important. In this paper, the authors explore how libraries and librarians might play a role in providing the public with access and guidance to legal information. These issues are considered primarily in the context of two scenarios: that of the self-represented litigant, and that of a party to a limited scope retainer. The authors consider in particular how public libraries as a public space and public librarians as trusted intermediaries might support the objective of greater access. The possible roles of law society/courthouse and academic libraries in training and collection development are also considered. The distinction between providing access to legal information and giving legal advice is discussed briefly, and the authors suggest some possible ways of clarifying this distinction while pursuing the goal of expanding public access to legal information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"99-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22329/WYAJ.V34I2.5020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/WYAJ.V34I2.5020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在改善公众诉诸司法的各种战略中,增加法律信息的可得性和可理解性必须列为重要事项。在本文中,作者探讨了图书馆和图书馆员如何在为公众提供法律信息的获取和指导方面发挥作用。这些问题主要是在两种情况下考虑的:一种是自我代表的诉讼当事人,另一种是有限范围的律师。作者特别考虑了公共图书馆作为一个公共空间和公共图书馆员作为可信赖的中介如何支持更大的访问目标。还考虑了法律协会/法院和学术图书馆在培训和馆藏发展方面可能发挥的作用。本文简要讨论了提供法律信息与提供法律咨询之间的区别,并提出了在追求扩大公众获取法律信息的目标的同时,澄清这一区别的一些可能的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing the 'Justice Gap' Through Access to Legal Information: Establishing Access to Justice Entry Points at Public Libraries
Among the strategies to improve public access to justice, increasing the accessibility and comprehensibility of legal information must be ranked as important. In this paper, the authors explore how libraries and librarians might play a role in providing the public with access and guidance to legal information. These issues are considered primarily in the context of two scenarios: that of the self-represented litigant, and that of a party to a limited scope retainer. The authors consider in particular how public libraries as a public space and public librarians as trusted intermediaries might support the objective of greater access. The possible roles of law society/courthouse and academic libraries in training and collection development are also considered. The distinction between providing access to legal information and giving legal advice is discussed briefly, and the authors suggest some possible ways of clarifying this distinction while pursuing the goal of expanding public access to legal information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信