稳定性分析法鉴定高产稳定油菜籽的有效性‎基因型‎

IF 1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
Hassan Amiri Oghan, Behnam Bakhshi, V. Rameeh, A. Faraji, A. Askari, H. Fanaei
{"title":"稳定性分析法鉴定高产稳定油菜籽的有效性‎基因型‎","authors":"Hassan Amiri Oghan, Behnam Bakhshi, V. Rameeh, A. Faraji, A. Askari, H. Fanaei","doi":"10.17557/tjfc.1055496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the complex issue in the way of releasing new high-yielding and stable oilseed rape ‎cultivars is genotype by environment interaction (GEI) which reduce selection efficiency. In ‎the current study, parametric and non-parametric statistics as well as the AMMI model have ‎been compared to identify the best stability models to clarify GEI complexity. The ‎experiment has been conducted in the warm regions of Iran including; Gorgan, Sari, Zabol, ‎and Hajiabad during two cropping seasons (2016-2017 and 2017-2018) for 16 genotypes in a ‎randomized complete block design with three replications. The AMMI analysis of variance on ‎grain yield showed the significant effects of genotype, environment, and the interaction ‎effects of GEI on yield. Based on the AMMI ANOVA, the major contribution of GEI was ‎captured by the first and second interaction principal component axes (IPCA1 and IPCA2) ‎which explained 34.29% and 29.81% of GEI sum of the square, respectively. Additionally, ‎Different parametric and non-parametric stability methods including; bi, S2di, CVi, W2i, σ2i, Pi, ‎Si(1), Si(2), Si(3), Si(6), Npi(1), Npi(2), Npi(3), Npi(4), KR and TOP have also investigated. Based on ‎AMMI, parametric, and non-parametric stability statistics, genotypes G2 (SRL-95-7) and G9 ‎‎(SRL-95-16)‎‏ ‏were selected as the stable and high-yielding genotypes. Likewise, Principal ‎component analysis based on rank correlation matrix enabled us to distinguish high-yielding ‎genotypes to stable (high-yielding genotypes in various environments) and unstable (high-‎yielding genotypes in low-yielding environments) ones. Furthermore, a significant Spearman ‎correlation was observed between yield mean and GSI, Pi, Si(3), Si(6), Npi(3), Npi(4), and KR. ‎Therefore, different efficient strategies were identified in this study‏ ‏and since we looked up ‎high-yielding and stable genotypes, G2 (SRL-95-7) and G9 (SRL-95-16)‎‏ ‏were finally ‎selected.‎","PeriodicalId":23385,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Field Crops","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficiency Of Stability Analysis To Identify High-Yielding And Stable Oilseed Rape ‎Genotypes ‎\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Amiri Oghan, Behnam Bakhshi, V. Rameeh, A. Faraji, A. Askari, H. Fanaei\",\"doi\":\"10.17557/tjfc.1055496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the complex issue in the way of releasing new high-yielding and stable oilseed rape ‎cultivars is genotype by environment interaction (GEI) which reduce selection efficiency. In ‎the current study, parametric and non-parametric statistics as well as the AMMI model have ‎been compared to identify the best stability models to clarify GEI complexity. The ‎experiment has been conducted in the warm regions of Iran including; Gorgan, Sari, Zabol, ‎and Hajiabad during two cropping seasons (2016-2017 and 2017-2018) for 16 genotypes in a ‎randomized complete block design with three replications. The AMMI analysis of variance on ‎grain yield showed the significant effects of genotype, environment, and the interaction ‎effects of GEI on yield. Based on the AMMI ANOVA, the major contribution of GEI was ‎captured by the first and second interaction principal component axes (IPCA1 and IPCA2) ‎which explained 34.29% and 29.81% of GEI sum of the square, respectively. Additionally, ‎Different parametric and non-parametric stability methods including; bi, S2di, CVi, W2i, σ2i, Pi, ‎Si(1), Si(2), Si(3), Si(6), Npi(1), Npi(2), Npi(3), Npi(4), KR and TOP have also investigated. Based on ‎AMMI, parametric, and non-parametric stability statistics, genotypes G2 (SRL-95-7) and G9 ‎‎(SRL-95-16)‎‏ ‏were selected as the stable and high-yielding genotypes. Likewise, Principal ‎component analysis based on rank correlation matrix enabled us to distinguish high-yielding ‎genotypes to stable (high-yielding genotypes in various environments) and unstable (high-‎yielding genotypes in low-yielding environments) ones. Furthermore, a significant Spearman ‎correlation was observed between yield mean and GSI, Pi, Si(3), Si(6), Npi(3), Npi(4), and KR. ‎Therefore, different efficient strategies were identified in this study‏ ‏and since we looked up ‎high-yielding and stable genotypes, G2 (SRL-95-7) and G9 (SRL-95-16)‎‏ ‏were finally ‎selected.‎\",\"PeriodicalId\":23385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Field Crops\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Field Crops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1055496\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Field Crops","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1055496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

高产稳定油菜新品种选育中的一个复杂问题‎品种是环境交互作用基因型,降低了选择效率。在里面‎目前的研究、参数统计和非参数统计以及AMMI模型‎以确定最佳稳定性模型,从而阐明GEI的复杂性。这个‎实验在伊朗温暖地区进行,包括;Gorgan、Sari、Zabol,‎在两个种植季节(2016-2017和2017-2018)‎三次重复的随机完全区组设计。AMMI方差分析‎粮食产量表现出基因型、环境和相互作用的显著影响‎GEI对产量的影响。根据AMMI方差分析,GEI的主要贡献是‎由第一和第二交互主分量轴(IPCA1和IPCA2)捕获‎分别解释了34.29%和29.81%的GEI平方和。此外,‎不同的参数和非参数稳定性方法,包括:;bi、S2di、CVi、W2i、σ2i、Pi,‎还研究了Si(1)、Si(2)、Si3、Si6、Npi1、Npi2、Npi3、Npi4、KR和TOP。基于‎AMMI,参数和非参数稳定性统计,基因型G2(SRL-95-7)和G9‎‎(SRL-95-16)‎‏ ‏被选为稳定高产的基因型。同样,委托人‎基于秩相关矩阵的成分分析使我们能够区分高产‎基因型到稳定(在各种环境中的高产基因型)和不稳定(高-‎在低产环境中的高产基因型)。此外,重要的斯皮尔曼‎观察到产量平均值与GSI、Pi、Si(3)、Si(6)、Npi(3),Npi(4)和KR之间的相关性。‎因此,本研究确定了不同的有效策略‏ ‏自从我们抬起头来‎高产稳定基因型G2(SRL-95-7)和G9(SRL-95.16)‎‏ ‏终于‎选定。‎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficiency Of Stability Analysis To Identify High-Yielding And Stable Oilseed Rape ‎Genotypes ‎
One of the complex issue in the way of releasing new high-yielding and stable oilseed rape ‎cultivars is genotype by environment interaction (GEI) which reduce selection efficiency. In ‎the current study, parametric and non-parametric statistics as well as the AMMI model have ‎been compared to identify the best stability models to clarify GEI complexity. The ‎experiment has been conducted in the warm regions of Iran including; Gorgan, Sari, Zabol, ‎and Hajiabad during two cropping seasons (2016-2017 and 2017-2018) for 16 genotypes in a ‎randomized complete block design with three replications. The AMMI analysis of variance on ‎grain yield showed the significant effects of genotype, environment, and the interaction ‎effects of GEI on yield. Based on the AMMI ANOVA, the major contribution of GEI was ‎captured by the first and second interaction principal component axes (IPCA1 and IPCA2) ‎which explained 34.29% and 29.81% of GEI sum of the square, respectively. Additionally, ‎Different parametric and non-parametric stability methods including; bi, S2di, CVi, W2i, σ2i, Pi, ‎Si(1), Si(2), Si(3), Si(6), Npi(1), Npi(2), Npi(3), Npi(4), KR and TOP have also investigated. Based on ‎AMMI, parametric, and non-parametric stability statistics, genotypes G2 (SRL-95-7) and G9 ‎‎(SRL-95-16)‎‏ ‏were selected as the stable and high-yielding genotypes. Likewise, Principal ‎component analysis based on rank correlation matrix enabled us to distinguish high-yielding ‎genotypes to stable (high-yielding genotypes in various environments) and unstable (high-‎yielding genotypes in low-yielding environments) ones. Furthermore, a significant Spearman ‎correlation was observed between yield mean and GSI, Pi, Si(3), Si(6), Npi(3), Npi(4), and KR. ‎Therefore, different efficient strategies were identified in this study‏ ‏and since we looked up ‎high-yielding and stable genotypes, G2 (SRL-95-7) and G9 (SRL-95-16)‎‏ ‏were finally ‎selected.‎
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信