横断山区大型植物超群落的生态地理格局

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY
H. Fu, Jingjing Guo, Yili Ge, Aiping Wu, Wei Li, Huanyao Liu, Guixiang Yuan, E. Jeppesen
{"title":"横断山区大型植物超群落的生态地理格局","authors":"H. Fu, Jingjing Guo, Yili Ge, Aiping Wu, Wei Li, Huanyao Liu, Guixiang Yuan, E. Jeppesen","doi":"10.1080/20442041.2023.2213630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Biological communities exhibit multiple distribution patterns at the metacommunity scale, and assessing the major drivers of these patterns is a key issue in community ecology. Here we investigated how the environmental and geographic gradients shape the distribution patterns of macrophytes at the metacommunity level. We applied the framework of the elements of the metacommunity structure (EMS) to identify the distinct types of 48 macrophyte metacommunities in the Hengduan Mountain region (HDMR) of China. We then used a generalized linear model and model selection approaches to determine which variables contributed to the variations of EMS and linear discriminant function analysis to evaluate how well the tested variables predicted metacommunity patterns. We found wide variations in the 3 EMS (i.e., coherence, range turnover, and range boundary clumping): latitude and alpha diversity were most important in determining coherence; nestedness was mostly related to turnover; and sampling depth was significantly associated with boundary clumping. Seven metacommunity types were identified in HDMR, and most metacommunities best fitted the Gleasonian and Clementsian patterns as well as their quasi-structures. Notably, Gleasonian and Q-Gleasonian patterns as well as the other 3 patterns (i.e., Q-nested, evenly spaced, and nested) were for the first time detected for macrophytes. These metacommunity types were best discriminated by nestedness, altitude, and latitude. Our results provide strong evidence of the impact of geographic patterns on macrophyte metacommunities, with the Gleasonian patterns dominant at both ends of the latitude/altitude gradient and Clementsian patterns common near the central part of the gradient.","PeriodicalId":49061,"journal":{"name":"Inland Waters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecogeographic patterns of macrophyte metacommunities in the Hengduan Mountain Region\",\"authors\":\"H. Fu, Jingjing Guo, Yili Ge, Aiping Wu, Wei Li, Huanyao Liu, Guixiang Yuan, E. Jeppesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20442041.2023.2213630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Biological communities exhibit multiple distribution patterns at the metacommunity scale, and assessing the major drivers of these patterns is a key issue in community ecology. Here we investigated how the environmental and geographic gradients shape the distribution patterns of macrophytes at the metacommunity level. We applied the framework of the elements of the metacommunity structure (EMS) to identify the distinct types of 48 macrophyte metacommunities in the Hengduan Mountain region (HDMR) of China. We then used a generalized linear model and model selection approaches to determine which variables contributed to the variations of EMS and linear discriminant function analysis to evaluate how well the tested variables predicted metacommunity patterns. We found wide variations in the 3 EMS (i.e., coherence, range turnover, and range boundary clumping): latitude and alpha diversity were most important in determining coherence; nestedness was mostly related to turnover; and sampling depth was significantly associated with boundary clumping. Seven metacommunity types were identified in HDMR, and most metacommunities best fitted the Gleasonian and Clementsian patterns as well as their quasi-structures. Notably, Gleasonian and Q-Gleasonian patterns as well as the other 3 patterns (i.e., Q-nested, evenly spaced, and nested) were for the first time detected for macrophytes. These metacommunity types were best discriminated by nestedness, altitude, and latitude. Our results provide strong evidence of the impact of geographic patterns on macrophyte metacommunities, with the Gleasonian patterns dominant at both ends of the latitude/altitude gradient and Clementsian patterns common near the central part of the gradient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inland Waters\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inland Waters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2023.2213630\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inland Waters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2023.2213630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecogeographic patterns of macrophyte metacommunities in the Hengduan Mountain Region
ABSTRACT Biological communities exhibit multiple distribution patterns at the metacommunity scale, and assessing the major drivers of these patterns is a key issue in community ecology. Here we investigated how the environmental and geographic gradients shape the distribution patterns of macrophytes at the metacommunity level. We applied the framework of the elements of the metacommunity structure (EMS) to identify the distinct types of 48 macrophyte metacommunities in the Hengduan Mountain region (HDMR) of China. We then used a generalized linear model and model selection approaches to determine which variables contributed to the variations of EMS and linear discriminant function analysis to evaluate how well the tested variables predicted metacommunity patterns. We found wide variations in the 3 EMS (i.e., coherence, range turnover, and range boundary clumping): latitude and alpha diversity were most important in determining coherence; nestedness was mostly related to turnover; and sampling depth was significantly associated with boundary clumping. Seven metacommunity types were identified in HDMR, and most metacommunities best fitted the Gleasonian and Clementsian patterns as well as their quasi-structures. Notably, Gleasonian and Q-Gleasonian patterns as well as the other 3 patterns (i.e., Q-nested, evenly spaced, and nested) were for the first time detected for macrophytes. These metacommunity types were best discriminated by nestedness, altitude, and latitude. Our results provide strong evidence of the impact of geographic patterns on macrophyte metacommunities, with the Gleasonian patterns dominant at both ends of the latitude/altitude gradient and Clementsian patterns common near the central part of the gradient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inland Waters
Inland Waters LIMNOLOGY-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Inland Waters is the peer-reviewed, scholarly outlet for original papers that advance science within the framework of the International Society of Limnology (SIL). The journal promotes understanding of inland aquatic ecosystems and their management. Subject matter parallels the content of SIL Congresses, and submissions based on presentations are encouraged. All aspects of physical, chemical, and biological limnology are appropriate, as are papers on applied and regional limnology. The journal also aims to publish articles resulting from plenary lectures presented at SIL Congresses and occasional synthesis articles, as well as issues dedicated to a particular theme, specific water body, or aquatic ecosystem in a geographical area. Publication in the journal is not restricted to SIL members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信