当读者打破规则

IF 0.7 3区哲学 0 RELIGION

Dead Sea Discoveries Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1163/15685179-02903008

Marijn van Putten

{"title":"当读者打破规则","authors":"Marijn van Putten","doi":"10.1163/15685179-02903008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Quranic text today is recited in ten canonical reading traditions with two distinct canonical transmissions each. These reading traditions are distinct in their phonological and morphological details, as well as the interpretation of the ambiguous consonantal text. However, they all have in common that they adhere to the consonantal skeleton of the standard Quran text. Despite this adherence, on rare occasions readers do deviate from this standard text. This paper examines those cases, and explores the reasons why the canonical readers felt licensed to do so. Especially ʾAbū ʿAmr was prone to deviate from the consonantal text in cases of perceived grammatical issues. Moreover, the readers occasionally deviated from their regional consonantal text when other regional codices had another form. Finally, readers deviated from the consonantal text, in cases where the text came in conflict with the pausal spelling principle.","PeriodicalId":42669,"journal":{"name":"Dead Sea Discoveries","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When the Readers Break the Rules\",\"authors\":\"Marijn van Putten\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685179-02903008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Quranic text today is recited in ten canonical reading traditions with two distinct canonical transmissions each. These reading traditions are distinct in their phonological and morphological details, as well as the interpretation of the ambiguous consonantal text. However, they all have in common that they adhere to the consonantal skeleton of the standard Quran text. Despite this adherence, on rare occasions readers do deviate from this standard text. This paper examines those cases, and explores the reasons why the canonical readers felt licensed to do so. Especially ʾAbū ʿAmr was prone to deviate from the consonantal text in cases of perceived grammatical issues. Moreover, the readers occasionally deviated from their regional consonantal text when other regional codices had another form. Finally, readers deviated from the consonantal text, in cases where the text came in conflict with the pausal spelling principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dead Sea Discoveries\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dead Sea Discoveries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-02903008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dead Sea Discoveries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-02903008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

今天的古兰经文本有十种经典阅读传统，每种都有两种不同的经典传播。这些阅读传统在语音和形态细节以及对歧义辅音文本的解释方面都是不同的。然而，它们都有一个共同点，那就是它们遵循《古兰经》标准文本的辅音骨架。尽管如此，在极少数情况下，读者确实偏离了标准文本。本文考察了这些情况，并探讨了规范读者认为有权这样做的原因。特别是在感知到语法问题的情况下，ʾAbúʿAmr容易偏离辅音文本。此外，当其他地区法典有另一种形式时，读者偶尔会偏离他们的地区辅音文本。最后，当文本与拼写错误原则相冲突时，读者会偏离辅音文本。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

When the Readers Break the Rules

The Quranic text today is recited in ten canonical reading traditions with two distinct canonical transmissions each. These reading traditions are distinct in their phonological and morphological details, as well as the interpretation of the ambiguous consonantal text. However, they all have in common that they adhere to the consonantal skeleton of the standard Quran text. Despite this adherence, on rare occasions readers do deviate from this standard text. This paper examines those cases, and explores the reasons why the canonical readers felt licensed to do so. Especially ʾAbū ʿAmr was prone to deviate from the consonantal text in cases of perceived grammatical issues. Moreover, the readers occasionally deviated from their regional consonantal text when other regional codices had another form. Finally, readers deviated from the consonantal text, in cases where the text came in conflict with the pausal spelling principle.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dead Sea Discoveries RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dead Sea Discoveries is an international journal dedicated to the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and associated literature. The journal is primarily devoted to the discussion of the significance of the finds in the Judean Desert for Biblical Studies, and the study of early Jewish and Christian history. Dead Sea Discoveries has established itself as an invaluable resource for the subject both in the private collections of professors and scholars as well as in the major research libraries of the world. ● Discussions on new discoveries from a wide variety of perspectives. ● Exchange of ideas among scholars from various disciplines. ● Thematic issues dedicated to particular texts or topics.