{"title":"日常生活中挥之不去的战争建筑:摄影与军器的双重时间","authors":"Agnė Narušytė","doi":"10.1080/17540763.2021.1903532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Time is a problem that war photography has to solve. Photojournalists have to be ‘in the right place and at the right time’ if they want to capture military action. Yet the speed and the surprise built into the core of such events means that war is mostly documented post factum. Instead of picturing dramatic action, most photographs show how effectively time deletes the damage to war, how quickly the drama disperses in everyday life. The temporal parallax inherent in the medium is explored by photographers focusing on substantial traces of war left in architecture built to last in time. The essay discusses how the elided trauma characteristic of Lithuania, an Eastern European country, can be detected from the architecture of war presented in photographs. It focuses on the following series by three photographers: (1944–1991) by Indrė Šerpytytė (2009), Surveillance (2015–2018) by Valentyn Odnoviun and Back to Shul (2018) by Richard Schofield.","PeriodicalId":39970,"journal":{"name":"Photographies","volume":"14 1","pages":"241 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17540763.2021.1903532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The architecture of lingering war in everyday life: photography and the double time of military apparatus\",\"authors\":\"Agnė Narušytė\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17540763.2021.1903532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Time is a problem that war photography has to solve. Photojournalists have to be ‘in the right place and at the right time’ if they want to capture military action. Yet the speed and the surprise built into the core of such events means that war is mostly documented post factum. Instead of picturing dramatic action, most photographs show how effectively time deletes the damage to war, how quickly the drama disperses in everyday life. The temporal parallax inherent in the medium is explored by photographers focusing on substantial traces of war left in architecture built to last in time. The essay discusses how the elided trauma characteristic of Lithuania, an Eastern European country, can be detected from the architecture of war presented in photographs. It focuses on the following series by three photographers: (1944–1991) by Indrė Šerpytytė (2009), Surveillance (2015–2018) by Valentyn Odnoviun and Back to Shul (2018) by Richard Schofield.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photographies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17540763.2021.1903532\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photographies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2021.1903532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2021.1903532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
时间是战争摄影必须解决的问题。摄影记者如果想要捕捉军事行动,就必须“在正确的地点和正确的时间”。然而,这类事件的发生速度之快和令人惊讶之处,意味着战争大多是事后记录下来的。大多数照片不是描绘戏剧性的行动,而是展示时间如何有效地消除战争的破坏,戏剧如何迅速地分散在日常生活中。摄影师通过关注建筑中留下的大量战争痕迹,探索了这种媒介固有的时间视差。本文讨论了如何从照片中呈现的战争建筑中发现立陶宛这个东欧国家被忽略的创伤特征。它重点介绍了三位摄影师的以下系列:indrvilŠerpytytė(2009)的(1944-1991),Valentyn Odnoviun的Surveillance(2015-2018)和Richard Schofield的Back to Shul(2018)。
The architecture of lingering war in everyday life: photography and the double time of military apparatus
Time is a problem that war photography has to solve. Photojournalists have to be ‘in the right place and at the right time’ if they want to capture military action. Yet the speed and the surprise built into the core of such events means that war is mostly documented post factum. Instead of picturing dramatic action, most photographs show how effectively time deletes the damage to war, how quickly the drama disperses in everyday life. The temporal parallax inherent in the medium is explored by photographers focusing on substantial traces of war left in architecture built to last in time. The essay discusses how the elided trauma characteristic of Lithuania, an Eastern European country, can be detected from the architecture of war presented in photographs. It focuses on the following series by three photographers: (1944–1991) by Indrė Šerpytytė (2009), Surveillance (2015–2018) by Valentyn Odnoviun and Back to Shul (2018) by Richard Schofield.