热点与试金石:从批判到伦理的空间实践

IF 1.1 0 ARCHITECTURE

Architecture and Culture Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/20507828.2020.1792107

J. Rendell

{"title":"热点与试金石:从批判到伦理的空间实践","authors":"J. Rendell","doi":"10.1080/20507828.2020.1792107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay starts with an event – what I have come to call “an ethical hotspot” – a moment in which my value systems were challenged and I found myself unable to continue to act as before, until I undertook some critical reflection. Marilys Guillemin and Lynn Gillam (2004) describe what they call “ethically important moments,” 1 which for them mark the “ethical dimension” of decision-making around the day to day dilemmas of research practice. For Guillemin and Gillam negotiating these dilemmas and their relation to institutional ethical procedures requires a degree of reflexivity on the part of the researcher. In this essay, I start by describing the ethical hot-spot that occurred in my life and then discuss how, by reflecting on these issues and the practices that I developed out of them, it might be possible to develop modes of ethical practice that I call – following Foucault – basanic.","PeriodicalId":42146,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Culture","volume":"8 1","pages":"407 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20507828.2020.1792107","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hotspots and Touchstones: From Critical to Ethical Spatial Practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Rendell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20507828.2020.1792107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This essay starts with an event – what I have come to call “an ethical hotspot” – a moment in which my value systems were challenged and I found myself unable to continue to act as before, until I undertook some critical reflection. Marilys Guillemin and Lynn Gillam (2004) describe what they call “ethically important moments,” 1 which for them mark the “ethical dimension” of decision-making around the day to day dilemmas of research practice. For Guillemin and Gillam negotiating these dilemmas and their relation to institutional ethical procedures requires a degree of reflexivity on the part of the researcher. In this essay, I start by describing the ethical hot-spot that occurred in my life and then discuss how, by reflecting on these issues and the practices that I developed out of them, it might be possible to develop modes of ethical practice that I call – following Foucault – basanic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture and Culture\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"407 - 419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20507828.2020.1792107\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1792107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1792107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文从一个事件开始——我称之为“道德热点”——在这个时刻，我的价值体系受到了挑战，我发现自己无法继续像以前一样行事，直到我进行了一些批判性反思。Marilys Guillemin和Lynn Gillam（2004）描述了他们所说的“道德上的重要时刻”，1对他们来说，这标志着围绕研究实践的日常困境进行决策的“道德层面”。对于Guillemin和Gillam来说，谈判这些困境及其与制度伦理程序的关系需要研究人员一定程度的反思。在这篇文章中，我首先描述了我生活中发生的伦理热点，然后讨论了通过反思这些问题和我从中发展出来的实践，如何有可能发展出我称之为——追随福柯——巴萨尼的伦理实践模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hotspots and Touchstones: From Critical to Ethical Spatial Practice

Abstract This essay starts with an event – what I have come to call “an ethical hotspot” – a moment in which my value systems were challenged and I found myself unable to continue to act as before, until I undertook some critical reflection. Marilys Guillemin and Lynn Gillam (2004) describe what they call “ethically important moments,” 1 which for them mark the “ethical dimension” of decision-making around the day to day dilemmas of research practice. For Guillemin and Gillam negotiating these dilemmas and their relation to institutional ethical procedures requires a degree of reflexivity on the part of the researcher. In this essay, I start by describing the ethical hot-spot that occurred in my life and then discuss how, by reflecting on these issues and the practices that I developed out of them, it might be possible to develop modes of ethical practice that I call – following Foucault – basanic.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Architecture and Culture ARCHITECTURE-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Architecture and Culture, the international award winning, peer-reviewed journal of the Architectural Humanities Research Association, investigates the relationship between architecture and the culture that shapes and is shaped by it. Whether culture is understood extensively, as shared experience of everyday life, or in terms of the rules and habits of different disciplinary practices, Architecture and Culture asks how architecture participates in and engages with it – and how both culture and architecture might be reciprocally transformed. Architecture and Culture publishes exploratory research that is purposively imaginative, rigorously speculative, visually and verbally stimulating. From architects, artists and urban designers, film-makers, animators and poets, from historians of culture and architecture, from geographers, anthropologists and other social scientists, from thinkers and writers of all kinds, established and new, it solicits essays, critical reviews, interviews, fictional narratives in both images and words, art and building projects, and design hypotheses. Architecture and Culture aims to promote a conversation between all those who are curious about what architecture might be and what it can do.