糖尿病神经病变的早期诊断及糖尿病足的预防

Q2 Medicine
Bárbara Peres Lapetina Gonçalves Saraiva, Juliana Daud Ribeiro, Bárbara De Araújo Casa, Renato Hideki Osugi, Gustavo Sawazaki Nakagome, Orlando Vitorino de Castro Neto, Manuela de Almeida Roediger, João Antônio Corrêa
{"title":"糖尿病神经病变的早期诊断及糖尿病足的预防","authors":"Bárbara Peres Lapetina Gonçalves Saraiva, Juliana Daud Ribeiro, Bárbara De Araújo Casa, Renato Hideki Osugi, Gustavo Sawazaki Nakagome, Orlando Vitorino de Castro Neto, Manuela de Almeida Roediger, João Antônio Corrêa","doi":"10.36311/jhgd.v33.14252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the diabetic foot is one of the most serious complications of diabetes mellitus. About 50% of non-traumatic amputations occur in these patients. In addition, it is an important public health problem and constitutes a chronic and complex metabolic disorder that is characterized by impaired metabolism of glucose and other complications in essential organs for the maintenance of life.\nObjective: to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of diabetic neuropathy using the Michigan self-assessment and physical examination in type 1 and type 2 diabetics.\nMethods: this is a cross-sectional study. The “Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instruments” classification was used to assess the degree of peripheral neuropathy, in which participants answered the questionnaire and were evaluated for the presence of foot lesions. All participants were stratified by the risk of developing foot ulcers according to the IWGDF protocol.\nResults: the sample had 200 participants. Regarding the IWGDF classification, 23 patients were classified as moderate risk (11.50%) and 61 as high risk for developing foot ulcers (30.50%). Using a cutoff of 2.5 on the physical examination score to diagnose neuropathy, a sensitivity of 97.62% and a specificity of 47.41% were obtained. Using a score greater than or equal to 6 in the self-assessment for the diagnosis of neuropathy, a sensitivity of 50.00% and a specificity of 94.83% were found.\nConclusion: the association of the Michigan physical examination (high sensitivity) with self-assessment (high specificity) increases the accuracy for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy.","PeriodicalId":35218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Growth and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy and prophylaxis of diabetic foot\",\"authors\":\"Bárbara Peres Lapetina Gonçalves Saraiva, Juliana Daud Ribeiro, Bárbara De Araújo Casa, Renato Hideki Osugi, Gustavo Sawazaki Nakagome, Orlando Vitorino de Castro Neto, Manuela de Almeida Roediger, João Antônio Corrêa\",\"doi\":\"10.36311/jhgd.v33.14252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: the diabetic foot is one of the most serious complications of diabetes mellitus. About 50% of non-traumatic amputations occur in these patients. In addition, it is an important public health problem and constitutes a chronic and complex metabolic disorder that is characterized by impaired metabolism of glucose and other complications in essential organs for the maintenance of life.\\nObjective: to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of diabetic neuropathy using the Michigan self-assessment and physical examination in type 1 and type 2 diabetics.\\nMethods: this is a cross-sectional study. The “Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instruments” classification was used to assess the degree of peripheral neuropathy, in which participants answered the questionnaire and were evaluated for the presence of foot lesions. All participants were stratified by the risk of developing foot ulcers according to the IWGDF protocol.\\nResults: the sample had 200 participants. Regarding the IWGDF classification, 23 patients were classified as moderate risk (11.50%) and 61 as high risk for developing foot ulcers (30.50%). Using a cutoff of 2.5 on the physical examination score to diagnose neuropathy, a sensitivity of 97.62% and a specificity of 47.41% were obtained. Using a score greater than or equal to 6 in the self-assessment for the diagnosis of neuropathy, a sensitivity of 50.00% and a specificity of 94.83% were found.\\nConclusion: the association of the Michigan physical examination (high sensitivity) with self-assessment (high specificity) increases the accuracy for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Growth and Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Growth and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v33.14252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Growth and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v33.14252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导读:糖尿病足是糖尿病最严重的并发症之一。约50%的非创伤性截肢发生在这些患者身上。此外,糖尿病是一个重要的公共卫生问题,是一种慢性和复杂的代谢紊乱,其特征是维持生命的重要器官的葡萄糖代谢受损和其他并发症。目的:评价密歇根自我评估和体格检查在1型和2型糖尿病患者中诊断糖尿病神经病变的敏感性和特异性。方法:这是一个横断面研究。使用“密歇根神经病变筛查工具”分类来评估周围神经病变的程度,参与者回答问卷并评估足部病变的存在。根据IWGDF方案,根据发生足部溃疡的风险对所有参与者进行分层。结果:样本有200名参与者。根据IWGDF分级,23例患者为中度风险(11.50%),61例为高风险(30.50%)。采用体格检查评分2.5的临界值诊断神经病变,敏感性为97.62%,特异性为47.41%。采用大于或等于6分的自评评分诊断神经病变,灵敏度为50.00%,特异性为94.83%。结论:密歇根体格检查(高敏感性)与自我评估(高特异性)相结合可提高糖尿病性神经病变的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy and prophylaxis of diabetic foot
Introduction: the diabetic foot is one of the most serious complications of diabetes mellitus. About 50% of non-traumatic amputations occur in these patients. In addition, it is an important public health problem and constitutes a chronic and complex metabolic disorder that is characterized by impaired metabolism of glucose and other complications in essential organs for the maintenance of life. Objective: to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of diabetic neuropathy using the Michigan self-assessment and physical examination in type 1 and type 2 diabetics. Methods: this is a cross-sectional study. The “Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instruments” classification was used to assess the degree of peripheral neuropathy, in which participants answered the questionnaire and were evaluated for the presence of foot lesions. All participants were stratified by the risk of developing foot ulcers according to the IWGDF protocol. Results: the sample had 200 participants. Regarding the IWGDF classification, 23 patients were classified as moderate risk (11.50%) and 61 as high risk for developing foot ulcers (30.50%). Using a cutoff of 2.5 on the physical examination score to diagnose neuropathy, a sensitivity of 97.62% and a specificity of 47.41% were obtained. Using a score greater than or equal to 6 in the self-assessment for the diagnosis of neuropathy, a sensitivity of 50.00% and a specificity of 94.83% were found. Conclusion: the association of the Michigan physical examination (high sensitivity) with self-assessment (high specificity) increases the accuracy for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Growth and Development
Journal of Human Growth and Development Social Sciences-Life-span and Life-course Studies
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信