在对零售数字化的恐惧与渴望之间:理解购物者矛盾反应的初步概念化

Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1177/20515707221107351
Fabien Rogeon, Aurélia Michaud-Trévinal, Isabelle Collin-Lachaud
{"title":"在对零售数字化的恐惧与渴望之间:理解购物者矛盾反应的初步概念化","authors":"Fabien Rogeon, Aurélia Michaud-Trévinal, Isabelle Collin-Lachaud","doi":"10.1177/20515707221107351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitalization has resulted in deep changes to the retail landscape, which have been the subject of extensive research. Most studies have only seen this growing phenomenon as a source of benefits for shoppers. However, this technological optimism runs into problems when the technologies offered by retailers are ignored or abandoned by shoppers. To address this gap, our research investigates how shoppers react to the digitalization of retailing through the prism of ambivalence. A systematic literature review identified a dataset of 108 papers in major journals published between 2005 and 2020. Our critical analysis revealed positive and negative reactions to digitalization among shoppers. Grouping these into pairs of two opposites, we propose an initial conceptualization of shopper ambivalence divided into eight distinct components. We also highlight the components of shopper ambivalence that merit further attention and offer a research agenda accordingly. Finally, our conceptualization may help managers to make sense of the heterogeneous reactions of shoppers to the technologies they offer.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between fear of and desire for the digitalization of retailing: An initial conceptualization to understand the ambivalent reactions of shoppers\",\"authors\":\"Fabien Rogeon, Aurélia Michaud-Trévinal, Isabelle Collin-Lachaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20515707221107351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digitalization has resulted in deep changes to the retail landscape, which have been the subject of extensive research. Most studies have only seen this growing phenomenon as a source of benefits for shoppers. However, this technological optimism runs into problems when the technologies offered by retailers are ignored or abandoned by shoppers. To address this gap, our research investigates how shoppers react to the digitalization of retailing through the prism of ambivalence. A systematic literature review identified a dataset of 108 papers in major journals published between 2005 and 2020. Our critical analysis revealed positive and negative reactions to digitalization among shoppers. Grouping these into pairs of two opposites, we propose an initial conceptualization of shopper ambivalence divided into eight distinct components. We also highlight the components of shopper ambivalence that merit further attention and offer a research agenda accordingly. Finally, our conceptualization may help managers to make sense of the heterogeneous reactions of shoppers to the technologies they offer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707221107351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707221107351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字化导致了零售业格局的深刻变化,这一直是广泛研究的主题。大多数研究只将这种日益增长的现象视为购物者的一种利益来源。然而,当零售商提供的技术被购物者忽视或放弃时,这种技术乐观主义就会遇到问题。为了解决这一差距,我们的研究通过矛盾心理的棱镜调查了购物者对零售业数字化的反应。一项系统的文献综述确定了2005年至2020年间发表在主要期刊上的108篇论文的数据集。我们的批判性分析揭示了购物者对数字化的积极和消极反应。我们将这些因素分为两对对立的因素,提出了购物者矛盾心理的初步概念,分为八个不同的组成部分。我们还强调了值得进一步关注的购物者矛盾心理的组成部分,并提供了相应的研究议程。最后,我们的概念化可能有助于管理者理解购物者对他们提供的技术的不同反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Between fear of and desire for the digitalization of retailing: An initial conceptualization to understand the ambivalent reactions of shoppers
Digitalization has resulted in deep changes to the retail landscape, which have been the subject of extensive research. Most studies have only seen this growing phenomenon as a source of benefits for shoppers. However, this technological optimism runs into problems when the technologies offered by retailers are ignored or abandoned by shoppers. To address this gap, our research investigates how shoppers react to the digitalization of retailing through the prism of ambivalence. A systematic literature review identified a dataset of 108 papers in major journals published between 2005 and 2020. Our critical analysis revealed positive and negative reactions to digitalization among shoppers. Grouping these into pairs of two opposites, we propose an initial conceptualization of shopper ambivalence divided into eight distinct components. We also highlight the components of shopper ambivalence that merit further attention and offer a research agenda accordingly. Finally, our conceptualization may help managers to make sense of the heterogeneous reactions of shoppers to the technologies they offer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信